 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
+ V' k& U2 ?; K _$ Z% z& @8 H! i3 d6 K- h m% k
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
. Q6 j! @/ O5 N阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
4 [+ x" m A' b2 l) z
' k( i. y; k7 x( L7 ]! _; H& {https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse, T" d4 z5 c( K& V$ J% ^; W1 r9 d" v
+ e& e Z6 P' {+ m3 kBraid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
( N. L' h. P( J, \6 p) {2 D0 Z& Z" T- I
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.
# F0 H5 P. g8 i! t8 P: |* d, [4 l3 _1 M0 s
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals., X0 U( m- u O: w% f
3 N7 K# b0 e5 L; _
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.
6 T/ W! }0 a& L+ e: f4 @
9 P: ]- E% y* f/ Y) y2 BAt one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
# k+ l3 ]( _* N; G% g7 h ^. V0 y& D6 J" Z) i! q u
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.! ?8 }% c( n, i, w' S; B( e5 E
2 o& M1 J- `$ h; c5 {4 ^& t' dBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems." N/ t" g9 K0 L/ |
8 f9 U8 s4 A! w* c( l6 T“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
# I3 i3 g1 o# s9 r6 S0 Y5 _/ f
9 l4 t6 h4 K& D4 D# s* vPremier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”# }6 }4 [! N, M& s% _$ z( E
! o+ a E& m6 r( C1 @* ?' E/ { + O" e$ F# ~- o7 |1 C( m
) y0 I/ F, q2 o2 \3 P% @
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.) @& ^ d u1 a. p
, I% t! Z# D; v/ X% b0 x* `It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.( G9 k: {7 S9 ~: w0 v; L
5 A* i' B& A, g/ u* `Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.5 v5 l( l' a: E( C. ]5 h- G, _
9 ?* v/ s# Q6 C0 s3 P, XGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.% |2 a' n: c9 [' q: K! i5 D
- _1 W( G% W! Q d1 OBut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.; h2 U( `6 q, O3 p) \3 \' X' }
7 R1 B8 ^4 _. V8 _3 b* rTrudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
& [3 h- B' k1 K: m8 s# e( n+ u
5 _8 A3 e5 ?8 F# l OActually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.6 u' f2 W" W3 B8 _* g+ `/ L
3 k; T9 |+ |6 l# q- d' U" \
“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.8 L* d$ R, B9 ]( v
7 h. l+ [/ a2 a2 H& P- G% v0 a“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.( r: W4 m" \, ]) Y
* y* j$ r3 z- j6 v; u4 ]“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”5 M2 s8 O) D) }/ J- |& p4 G
) k& n1 k; a2 }" {0 h! m+ D
|
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 ; S' g* A E- y: f) g- ?& l
