 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑
* P0 O# J' D F% F/ Z1 e# l) k9 u. j+ ]) s- ^- l" y
! w3 ^8 X( ]7 A: v/ Y0 i/ V你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:6 `% k/ ]& z4 k2 G1 v$ C& ]
Ralph Klein7 U2 f }% C9 B' p; S! [
* ^4 E3 N/ u5 a4 f9 k我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!
6 X4 C+ ^% i# z! ?" q3 [- l
% W/ L* r9 @! X所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。
2 |; y6 [5 A0 {! i! M5 [: X4 ]1 \; ]4 o6 U
* V" b# {0 c4 M" x; `# X- Q3 o5 @8 p
http://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades
( k# a2 A! e5 B3 X7 v- Z* }9 R5 kHistoric Alberta budget balances:6 m! Y6 @" D r# x# }% A
9 ?$ r v/ S: M* k+ S1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus
# b! Y% f( X7 c8 o1 X
0 a" K1 w. \" C1982-83: $796 million deficit
" |5 Z! y3 Q2 b) A" Y1 U y( Z' K# S5 C1 m
1983-84: $129 million surplus
# a. S- ?* Q; v( v8 }' n$ M' O
+ H& i* H! ?0 k; y- L# ~$ H1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus
) s7 |- K$ W: g" F3 o! a5 T# h _6 E( K! v6 `
1985-86: $761 million deficit
3 m! P* F- ]/ [' y! B1 m* _* l+ w
" s0 G) K' ^, g; N7 J1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit
6 ?' B; g% T, ^/ H8 S( m1 E5 O2 c7 a
1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit
7 x/ S a, O- ~. l8 B
0 j* z* B4 h* ~" P1 b9 z9 A- J1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit5 R5 D. d. u% n
! H$ e7 Z" W5 E9 C1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit
3 t0 m% s F1 z* J) a
+ s1 C7 e2 F# G" T4 d l9 i1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit
" d- \* c6 X$ }! d% X6 e- X E+ ?( D) w5 a0 m$ D: u$ g) V0 V
1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit6 K+ q. x6 l: l2 P4 v
2 @$ k6 Y: G/ G: v1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit
@" |* u0 Y% I5 Z1 X* }2 `, M# c/ X0 x! r* M6 i9 a
1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit R. b' f( F/ C3 u! ^, l
/ c, z, c s7 ^3 B, m
1994-95: $938 million surplus$ F( [( Y" ?) x0 v
& @- C& \( ]. V, l1 J- o& F1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus
# |7 z: O, f# ~9 S
( f% t* [: Z4 ^) \" i( x1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus: I+ I' n* p& e2 f+ i$ c5 z
9 j; K j7 S) R( _8 f. a8 Q. y7 w0 ^1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus* V6 W: u9 t' H% t, a+ f* k+ y
! ~1 {! R' R! Z8 ] I# Y8 [, @1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus* W. v! L2 s& f: n
5 X+ {% }* M" y
1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus
: _8 ~7 N- b) X! u# C/ i0 t7 G2 {9 r4 X& S$ z6 p% @3 L& _2 n
2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus
. e r6 v5 A- {4 z. i
; `' B0 C9 f0 a5 o+ l& t2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus
$ t4 m0 F& }* ]3 _# H1 q
* j r2 q9 F* a& Z( h: p2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus
' B# h2 e% ]% O+ z; M+ u* ~
: n% u" |- o, d4 M" ]5 `2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus, m. `% L/ q3 o5 C9 x6 {0 f1 d
7 ~. C) v1 ]- e
2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus
9 @ ?2 V4 i1 w3 z; o) a l6 j& e& s3 l# q3 Q
2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus
R$ O2 A: p% e' i+ `9 `6 p9 J( @* j, I e/ ^" |3 t
2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus \) V3 e% g) h
8 \; J, K9 m* r- s" R$ G8 Q
2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus
& K: U5 C+ J6 k3 d0 R/ ?) O9 M4 @# {" \: v0 c0 e
2008-09: $852 million deficit
6 V% S$ w% V8 j# }, w+ ?" ]5 o
) z# |! q* W% o0 u2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit
/ C/ |, Q9 }( k1 G' x4 F4 R( M
/ g# Z' X' R6 j2 V* n1 \' E& }2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit3 P- Z3 f0 N+ ^# \/ n2 x
o# [$ P, v% Y( K1 L+ f$ \
2011-12: $23 million deficit U m0 W; t0 K9 ~! X" Y( F0 o
; I; K: |* c# k" @
2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit# \* S% Y/ ~; b, x: v W
1 |$ D2 v: A: C( k# e
2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|