请问各位这个房子如何

粽子

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDe ... p;PidKey=-829276348

# _$ o; P2 j' O+ @值这个价钱吗

ram

我认为房子不错。

skybird

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDetails.aspx?propertyId=10659596&PidKey=-829276348
) {7 p* V8 |5 f: S1 N- f
+ N' N+ S' i! @! ]值这个价钱吗
粽子 发表于 2011-5-12 16:04

" m7 b' ^- \$ X去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。

ram

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。
skybird 发表于 2011-5-12 17:37

眼见为实。

健康营养站

good.worth.

icing

not bad, I like it. And the price is much lower than gov. assess value.
Tax Roll: 9982751
Assessed Value: $497,000
$ k8 }/ k& j$ Z* w100% Taxable: Yes
- ?5 P6 {- X! t/ w: B2 k  _100% Complete: Yes
. D. Q* K  a; }4 \0 x  kNeighbourhood: Richford
6 t6 }3 F0 I8 J+ `7 @* B# v2 tProperty Type: Residential
Land Use: 100% Single Family Dwelling
2 T( J& V& a' Z& ?. U3 YLot Size: 467.092 M2 / 5027.9 FT2 / .115 AC
Building Count: 1
- r* J7 @! k! [. @* F6 F3 o2 PYear Built, Building Class: 2000, 2 Storey With Basement
Approx Living Area: 201.4 M2 / 2167.9 FT2
(Does not include basement area or 3rd level of split level)
/ W% g& k; B$ w/ dBasement Development: No
Garage: Yes
7 M' W9 _6 I, e& dFireplace: Yes
Walkout Basement: No
Air Conditioning: No

uil

the position is something need to concern.

Stethoscope

it looks ok.
7 R" O* u/ n' g4 ?; y/ f
: E) ^, C& ?! E2 O$ {5 U8 p  Y% dyou better get there and have a look on ur own, then you can get something different from the pictures.