 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
& m5 K6 B N$ n$ E' c, n, H- u
( F, i: E0 A# |; S* P* vF4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
0 M. f3 y& l$ N3 @2 V0 L" h% t3 I( x
**********************************
3 B; J* K$ {4 H4 xAnyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:, U+ I% k# ~$ d' } V0 |- t
# M* R0 a. o' _* ` m/ {9 c) S1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4." a2 w! P7 e+ _% ?% G( J9 m
8 \ k9 \( u8 J, C: `& Q ^
2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
3 H. k, d& a7 R. T: x. o: y: }& r5 ?) ^1 n
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
5 g6 n, B+ ~5 X+ |: H) I8 J. ~8 G2 X+ U4 r8 j2 r
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
, i$ P+ a- H/ | q& i- T. M$ x: g8 J) J0 k
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|