 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:4 i& h* N/ ^7 S
# u% p1 }9 D; Y, BF4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。3 E) w1 V& f+ D" x: B
3 ~5 A p/ R0 r% N; w; d( F" x( {**********************************
% N' }: E' ~8 P7 pAnyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
8 e* L: J9 Q- `+ `/ |
, A% H; p6 q! M5 i( e5 ~) u$ [1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.
0 m$ q, S8 E: T1 M6 X; N6 y( e9 `1 [5 B# v9 m' n: s' k c0 u
2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
5 L2 P6 y* \& T) G) H/ p% l9 k. d* R( I. S* d) C E
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
, U) m. r3 ~8 ~' w7 Q9 i) r- O ^1 P; p3 G- j* s0 `5 W
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.! o) i2 R- |7 d7 Z
( m! y& ~& u9 j' e5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|