 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:1 ^7 ~ }* N# G
4 x0 k. W, Q1 U: \
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
+ Y: d- p9 V1 T% E
?, t F$ a |- O5 l**********************************
. O6 Z, i. [# k+ N/ i8 cAnyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
+ b+ O+ e$ H' a6 r( y. l# X. e/ j m5 i3 W4 U# R# k
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.
+ F9 u3 s* \& u0 ?. }9 w% X2 b4 k- ^, C, L6 ^5 v
2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.: a" d& e* z# n2 p$ v( p0 U
% G1 F: {" }! u+ S) g3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.0 I/ {' R% k" T
3 j' n" h' L: G; Y4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
. ]; I" ^$ [% F9 P7 F% Y8 h9 D$ B$ F7 U, E2 _
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|