6#cactus_2009 + N, y8 v' l' O* [$ J; [% M 6 {+ `0 ]# s* X# EThis may be a rare case but when rabbithill road was finished through all the way to 23rd ave., Whitemud Oak subdivision emerged as a mid-level residentials, so it is not the best of riverbend area. If 1-5 ranking with 5 the best is used, it probably will be 3 only.
6# cactus_2009 + _4 U, _" ~4 [: M5 Q7 }
- U1 \! X5 m4 u; z
This may be a rare case but when rabbithill road was finished through all the way to 23rd ave., Whitemud Oak subdivision emerged as a mid-level residentials, so it is not the best ...3 |' q! e, C2 v
ceramistpalace 发表于 2010-1-17 21:29
/ R0 v3 r, \' N/ r3 H 3 Y2 m+ l3 G3 r2 I' D: @. PSo which area in riverbend is considered as 5 then?
So which area in riverbend is considered as 5 then? ( ?- f3 s+ L* P& Z6 M6 O% c- Q特北京 发表于 2010-1-18 09:32
! {8 ^: b/ {. B l& h, Z* ?+ i
I would think, for older areas, eagleridge, whitemud creek, newer areas like magrath summit, terwillegar gardens etc. are the 5s. But what the 1-5 ranking I suggested is only a rough classification, for some particular areas within the 5s, one may consider them as 5 plus which are even better.