 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|
楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
7 @# \& c2 w! ?# i楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!/ B" V ?; P0 S W5 `; j' R: p
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
( N% E9 V: {( m' h- Y
) L) |( `; n+ S, L您说的对呀，我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理， 所以听您这一说：我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了， 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
1 q1 e& O: c2 x- ]+ j7 n) k6 h! r7 o0 Q- A6 ]
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有：可靠性高（故障率低，ｏｒ ｈｉｇｈ ｒｅｌｉａｂｉｌｉｔｙ）, 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.- [% Z+ V9 I M
0 Z$ `/ a' \ q" H8 r9 j不过，你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择，Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗？5 o z0 Q$ c' h3 a
) m5 ], S ]+ a' A/ X) X6 O5 E1 ]: v- z
另外，“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息，偶要查他个水落石出，好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。, D- j/ q3 ^) l$ U9 ]9 q2 V1 Y
( c. w! B$ X2 y+ I关于安全，我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 （SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了）：' \& F) n' U3 _$ d- d' {
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.* c9 c8 V4 d1 o
- j( D* i: t8 h zOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
! A" X' d, L- h, }8 o! b; p
6 [7 O2 a; U6 {But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe." N$ } j0 v; j
0 r. k/ V% P7 q6 Q0 q
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|
狗仔卡
发表于 2007-12-9 21:44
提升卡
置顶卡
沉默卡
喧嚣卡
变色卡
显身卡
