 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 8 R& j0 J& \$ Y3 U8 E4 _1 N
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
2 R0 m8 F* X$ b# b6 [corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... + D V! ^+ ?6 w$ |$ N
' ?- o# T2 l3 H6 ?9 _1 J8 G. ^& w
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
5 T9 H! U+ o7 U, F
0 e0 b5 m2 O5 @7 a# n安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless., V1 o$ U# r1 q9 A
4 }) b6 k7 ~( |; K0 Y3 q不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?7 [% v, R, k1 O3 S+ {# D- R
6 k, Q9 R. N, g0 t. i4 P
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。0 s9 h9 \, P6 i6 e: w% M
! D6 b" L3 n E关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):- ?' y: I2 r5 C1 d( J
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.6 E% k' s4 n( x5 @5 ^& n* ~
& x! D1 ?' F2 I' b. v
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
& \" ^1 b" s% s/ f3 [9 ^) P! I+ X% R6 t" k3 V" ?
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.& N# \9 f2 n! r& ~# g" X( o
$ L; N/ N+ X% O/ z. A9 Y[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|