 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 8 \7 w: d8 n* c% T6 l/ f% m
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!* \ C( D2 k$ ?, p$ `5 b7 {
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
8 I: D5 i& |4 \$ \7 O/ D
! ?6 p3 p, a% u' {3 f5 ]您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。! Q" {7 h& Z2 Q3 D# y
p, T" S# O5 L( g安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.- c' Z" Y# R/ S( y% q
S ]! s, r; ?& \/ k) W5 u
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
3 u2 J" y( P! p- p+ L; F9 d' T4 W$ q
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。8 J' S, s+ ^0 B
* j+ u }. r1 `
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
& s$ l% _: O: ^0 Y: wYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers. n& U6 | v5 V# n& {
. N7 `6 G5 R' V" k3 C' cOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car"." V) Q. R/ m( @" |1 B
; X4 U& ~$ Q! c7 {0 y6 K: H! p
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe./ q0 x- Q# o+ G. R+ z) _
" i2 J* B6 Q7 a' c
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|