 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 6 [6 F! g2 w1 I3 G2 H' Q- ]
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!1 v1 L1 K. ` W. ?' Q. u
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... ( _! V+ D( q. C
- y: }& u) }, G6 R+ y
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。4 D5 ^8 R0 ]9 ^
8 W5 J9 j6 N; L. O: o
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
/ g, i" B, R2 m1 }4 t; l1 X0 O4 w) ]
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
. m' }: c F7 q( t; P% {( B" p0 P& K0 n, q
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
- W" e3 F- o/ g: A
: p# {0 ~! j" }- P5 c: _关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):: G, \( K. N; |6 k$ d
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.2 ~. R" i& d! ~
, y. }4 c' v: Y' h, I4 R
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".- o- W; L. V+ J1 N
) g0 E+ O6 K) X( k
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
0 t# p- U4 S' Y( D+ j$ T& T) J
, Y* T* f+ ?8 b$ n[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|