 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
/ c$ v! z7 R3 d3 {3 q/ x楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
3 V& e7 P9 ?# ~$ c6 t" Ocorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
4 c% e+ v9 ^8 V7 W* }/ h7 ?5 r8 J6 M
2 g( G4 {7 d+ |您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
: ^# W) e% u& e- |; ^& U* J3 \; M2 ^" \4 s( \( c% X. d
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.+ J. f9 g0 o8 ?
# e4 S* Z6 ?1 C
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗? R) u% i- N' ?: l0 |
/ {3 c) c$ p6 G! r5 }" ?
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
. V) C+ `6 a5 m
9 z; `7 O6 R% F2 ~9 e" g3 b关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):9 e, L0 I7 Z. C! x5 f' @$ b+ `) a
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.* z1 g+ k" N1 b
" }+ U% P9 ?# L( N$ H# _9 r" K& COr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".5 Z! Z1 Q( w# [- ^7 x( l
# U! r" e/ m+ j( m9 x0 LBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
" G$ _1 S+ Y2 J, X4 Z3 U/ t
) z- `3 t8 l) O[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|