 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
4 g- C/ h0 f4 }5 A
6 T: S; y) b" R3 ?: K
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
# |4 e0 d3 }2 E阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。! p8 ]7 Q" n, z# `) }
1 ^; E" k1 K: ]: ?) n+ phttps://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse# m3 q! C0 @% L s) t* L
, h X. L- B; l2 m. {Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse U; |( U& P% w S% q
3 ]' x' y; C' ~. y hOh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.
# n) X; `4 X9 P4 r
3 n; n' Q; A: r; P' F9 R' k: d( PThat’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
* n6 f5 P2 T- h. M4 z) M0 X, w5 M$ K A/ h1 P9 x1 b) U: w; d
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.1 G- r* K0 B: X5 N3 Z& Q( J# z* |
6 h! F1 P$ ?1 S J3 d; ^
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”- l/ I% H7 \9 t1 E- y# X- }+ p
2 j W5 v& x; {1 r/ u; M, \: G1 ~6 AActually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.- L% a5 z3 L9 N# R! z
! r' A' I: x E+ R# G# `, Q' t% N
But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.' Y$ I) r# I. d: c
6 J1 i! }6 p. Q B; Y+ R# Y
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
; _, o2 X% N2 j* t; M4 A
: O- L: s5 d4 M/ I9 j xPremier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”- t! o* P' E+ P
9 d2 y. r! V' I- _
 & j$ ^2 T8 i2 a
) O5 O) E7 e7 s3 VThe job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
+ |. b) }6 j& P8 j, e3 M/ W+ a& t: K/ [, e7 q% L
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.
8 e6 S6 ]/ x! C# B5 Z, @# q7 p
- ~8 j- ~2 T6 R5 {) ANow it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.1 b) a1 }2 N5 g6 X8 Z, s! |7 C
) T4 K& r; w5 X; t( o# [
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.0 s( l0 {7 s; a
0 B X% u* T! T9 N$ j2 ?4 LBut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
4 A: d0 X, I, x+ w
/ R# Q; j- E, c. m8 E* WTrudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.; W' p a. ^6 _" s) x3 ]. m
7 k$ K, Q3 P( ]1 e9 uActually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
6 M3 N- G" o/ D; B* m7 C4 w0 K: [* J( a7 _8 R
“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
. V& _+ E! }: \8 L+ J" z! v2 |, b. i" \5 E
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting./ t! x b( I2 b* I
) C% D" c0 I) S* i) z% g# O“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”
1 t9 Q' s( s- {1 C+ O; V s4 ^% Q7 C
|
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 ! J7 m7 I' \8 f. \' V9 E/ z
