 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
/ p- ]5 Q8 |% |7 `" S _2 E
5 l9 Z5 W/ b0 V6 z$ S诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。. R! x8 Y8 F( k. g' q
阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
7 I* W% K9 ~3 P) u5 Z, C
# f0 \9 `# S' Vhttps://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse& G' n0 N0 l o
8 E9 H7 p5 t9 }& z# t) z! G8 Q
Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
+ B; I0 M5 J+ p/ m& m& z/ Y3 E- S: D" `
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.: f4 F, ^2 S2 z5 q* p
9 Q7 v& E V2 N* D j0 RThat’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
u9 w) C9 s# S. n
2 V2 f6 D) z; R& C7 G2 l8 D- yHe said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.6 d; A6 M9 C1 Y
* t, ^" F* Z- K1 e3 q7 i UAt one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
8 `% l! t2 f v
0 e6 ^2 S" l6 G$ v+ yActually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
( J y. \: y. r4 x% a- N7 l* A+ f' H$ Q4 t
But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
6 M& a, G0 _8 g0 ?9 N) d: J
: r2 y6 e9 `; [ [: O! T. I/ E9 c“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”* {# B) g& [+ H
8 [0 e# ?2 _ Q$ ~
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”( b, J$ i) _6 f) V& I+ ~1 y* u4 B8 n
* C5 D( L8 ]1 }2 y9 s) x
7 n9 a! O4 r. s+ D/ }' u) k! H- b# c' d" Q3 }6 O% w" e
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
% Z' q% @: [' I) @% M
! A9 M! i2 |! g1 A" @. TIt had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.
3 ?1 V: A( G, X' o$ v; [) t7 }8 o! e. g/ _3 O; r6 o. d' z
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.! u/ t7 Z" K L" R7 `; `
8 c+ @: t! O' _) n* g
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.% |7 H* N) y4 p" ]
5 }% X) x* \" t0 Q* k% T, _: E' KBut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
2 i) {* I1 v6 j( I! A9 ?3 {" y
/ d5 y0 Q8 S& c9 C7 n5 X+ YTrudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
9 q2 i' x6 s3 _4 s( ^ \0 R( i( R9 }$ V- [( V J
Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
' N3 L( ?( [& l+ ]: a
5 B& y* J& H9 W3 C6 P" }, U$ R“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.2 i5 x8 N" ]! F9 u! g) e
2 L+ h# b; S1 h0 F' u/ y“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting./ K5 n) u/ e, `; S: C
) P8 Z, w. M! U' r: t; W
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”
) H" x5 @% S* f- q* e8 [
" t$ {) k ]! Y- |9 ] |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 ) W9 q$ q3 _1 G" ~$ M
