 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
; g! }5 }' n6 |
9 B* ?) _; O2 [, K* u8 U% I0 i诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。6 R, E I) @' M# [ w3 S( j" ^
阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
' R4 f8 R. a2 U( I' Q
/ P$ E( R5 ?* M% z2 j0 Ahttps://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse
/ n! i. G1 T3 G1 F
% c$ O3 `7 _5 {+ pBraid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
% q7 s2 R6 \8 E* R3 V5 I! t! r7 y/ u9 y) H8 v
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.
7 r$ Q$ l: c/ Q! q# N( O6 n2 J4 {9 J7 R' f" u9 ]
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.' {7 D! W+ s% X f6 u
' @/ x/ b" a4 v' EHe said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns." s8 [" ^! C3 A% g4 l* l
+ ?5 x& a. }" s7 O* MAt one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”6 D5 P. R/ _" @0 _: t# |
8 B1 G- w8 g& XActually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
G" k F& r6 W- y
3 a! J4 }2 z9 Y7 W3 ZBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
3 x& d/ H+ R+ j; a# A: n) Q- M# F; a( B7 ? @" C6 V+ h0 m
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”' B% s4 u' ?; X f- G1 @
% x9 S$ y" p% b; F" ~ l8 I' qPremier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
2 c: e, D+ w4 I) A6 z2 O9 r0 Y" D. F, ^; e% C
. j) C: N9 r/ t) `
4 f' o, r1 V2 p0 i. Y6 Z2 J% o! DThe job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.& ?. a7 ~: c, L" |6 V
% I1 H' k1 A( B9 s& s
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.! G0 d9 ?& a* Y/ a
( A; Q6 K" n( H1 U- k. R: k
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
6 r; @3 m1 U( G9 V' j! j" O7 a3 `: y- l: Z2 ~
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.5 D8 N, R- E: Q1 T {- v
2 ^) R9 D* \- l) g y* T* oBut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.% b9 f5 A7 a* x( N; x: Q
2 G. O4 [3 g+ BTrudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.6 H2 |8 b+ @3 p6 v
. E( A/ B2 K3 q: j+ f. LActually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.& x% f$ O9 \1 e
( [4 E% l6 W9 x8 y, a* `0 _- L“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.4 ~3 }, z K& { P' U3 [& Z% `2 \% P
3 _' O8 n( V) A7 f* Z6 \, F
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.
+ @* m% L( Q/ x( o4 Y Y
$ _/ W7 a4 q- e: V; ?2 D; B“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”" ^3 B1 w& M4 l4 v8 \" M9 H
7 Q8 x% y1 |3 |1 b! w; |, H( y) M |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 6 ~& D+ C0 J+ y% K. u6 Z
