 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
) P2 `" W9 P7 n" m( d' l) z6 A
; W% ]' W1 [& s" `' S诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。0 t& q, g t, y
阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
, j' V5 a8 i4 l& i" T# b5 F, X& A0 U0 [4 c" f% b% O
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse3 M9 r# N2 u- p, }$ [5 G
4 u! a- C' O5 h2 l- P8 P+ Y* e
Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
: a) U. N, p6 l- Y: S+ U1 {0 j9 ~/ Q8 J1 s9 X1 J$ \
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.$ u3 h k: d% f ?
) Z1 n4 T" g, i9 I" B5 e
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.6 a7 E- M3 C, F7 l# l
- ]/ N7 }: D1 ^0 I' T
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.
. g, C# i& K5 @, d& z9 o! o$ a$ w" {0 K2 a8 s
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”6 a; z8 b! `/ W; A
6 v# U; V& p* k# g! FActually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.+ }% A8 p3 U# D3 e3 r
) c. E/ g; M5 u& ]. C* @
But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
$ R( n) L5 L: [3 Z
) e: x* q8 e( V( z( O$ ]“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
" l! a m l1 H4 H# ~
3 d+ a- }$ n/ o2 p# o' DPremier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”: @* M' }$ a& d1 Q
3 c: m, S9 t( K: T9 z
2 n2 X5 s1 g8 D: L+ N3 n: v; m* ?! Y U9 e" e
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
% D" x4 t' J/ n! x7 {2 [
- J- B4 n, p+ i2 \( @$ F1 B8 q3 ZIt had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.
6 b. X& g# D0 C& f/ o, d# D6 r0 B% B. A% w; M5 @2 E
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
2 y: G# I6 f: p* C3 ~( w, v, b7 ^. Z" E% R* z
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.! J9 L l9 G: D# L, l h3 t
& {; r# p9 M/ g; N. mBut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
; S5 x5 Q! b# \+ {1 I/ T1 O# ?$ b( k" `) H: A6 r
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.7 [# d' c! r" H) U, X4 a
% l/ M% m1 m" E: X5 V+ aActually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.' I; P4 T1 V2 e& {! H
- G4 g3 u" l. _& J. {
“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
# @2 S2 s5 Z7 O# k
3 g2 T6 S2 F4 W: D' X“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.) e' T; J8 K2 Q6 I+ g: h6 |
" Q1 U& `1 R. F3 |' M7 _; W- v
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”
6 y6 m) G1 s9 Y# p
1 Q5 @8 Y( `6 w. \6 R* q |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 
