 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
& B$ n8 F2 t2 ^$ M7 W! I; q
( }& G. x8 C/ M1 |诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
7 h( R6 t8 T% S( [9 s$ `阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。: T( x8 c+ w0 G3 \2 A) L2 R8 v
! P4 ?4 l) D H' G Thttps://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse
, Q2 c+ k: P D( i6 d6 n
+ M {& a# C& T' ZBraid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse) ~. k' e6 a5 T5 e: N b; Z
: a3 ]! w7 h+ a' p4 Z# Q& A5 q
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.
$ q& D+ Y( Y) M6 W% ~# t! L6 e: h, u
! f$ ?. j, ^( E4 K* S3 h) nThat’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
' }3 f: {% R/ U# p7 p9 M) s
! f2 w+ o: ]' \4 f% m4 fHe said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.
! J4 w1 r2 }4 f- g
. p- T+ H3 i: x3 p4 m! r7 [At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
- n1 S6 F5 d* h' t- B; O' h, f( M w3 {; A4 }6 ^- o |: ^/ Z# l) n
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.: q: g" P8 l( i
% h) b2 H0 j" @% l% q/ ?But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.1 N- t3 C* Y& s
, ^' r0 Q9 x6 A2 M
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”& E8 E d" y1 U7 J/ z
3 W! p0 z9 \# k( `1 a
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
$ u( M/ ^! {5 k y. e3 K
7 z& z$ H2 z0 r t; t" p' ~1 V9 u
9 ?# P5 r7 ^" k7 ?7 t4 \
7 _1 U" M7 f, m, K! N- g) e0 U- ZThe job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.7 e- n3 V6 b/ |( x3 x/ a/ y
, Q7 N" }5 E1 W2 S
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.
" p$ D0 X- U' S. E: n) U
- j2 G! X& w. G8 T xNow it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.9 K6 J% ^* J# T4 j+ |3 M
, t1 J" \; r7 w& i( D8 B
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.5 D& I* |0 e6 g! z: U# f4 O
3 s" e% ^6 e) q+ q
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
* e9 L+ h9 P; t. P( m) @0 K1 u* i7 C( e$ P
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.* L F: X2 x6 [3 g/ n: J- Y
/ q1 n e% [: o# Z% S! P. p5 D8 yActually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.+ I; Q+ L; i3 O2 x! k# v6 A3 H, r# @
* |% S" Y7 e& i
“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.# p9 Z( _# }) Y6 R9 }9 c; ?
N8 G5 z. e. [5 a) K
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting., F4 j B& w9 E" s9 d. \- t
3 n. e% G6 ^, V* v* [“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”5 B* D3 m! r0 P/ D9 m3 b4 l X7 U/ R
1 m- t1 m7 R; V' k4 K' h
|
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 & [ |# Z) E( v5 H6 c. }
