 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
& E3 Y6 J( h( D
& H1 k t9 K2 I' b) z
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
+ {& p8 n' _" m/ t% T) Z$ E阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
! _' v! v c# L0 q: l% \0 P% {, o! P5 f/ |/ n$ j! {
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse
0 ^- k8 N4 K; n& t; `4 x3 t. E) ?# u# Y" }2 H/ z' y8 G0 ? l
Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse% k! ?) I' {+ b9 h% }
( ?9 D5 V* C. }Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.- B5 |9 @6 Z! c% A. M9 U8 D
2 g1 D: P4 ~. i; e, l7 i; WThat’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals., x9 y& J% [% H% B" G8 e
3 E# ?# H( ^1 v. X$ mHe said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.
, Q! k1 i9 C$ {6 s5 I7 O- d' o4 P* n( a; i/ b8 ^
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”: h8 e' y2 z2 I
+ k9 z9 y" X+ o9 G1 R- |* _3 YActually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
+ o- T9 O5 ]; J! X9 D4 M& ^) {* _9 @" ?) E( O
But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
% y( U4 e" v0 A$ v1 e( Q3 z8 l5 c5 H: Z5 h: O- i# y5 F
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”; g) S6 }8 u% Q! W* Q; D
% A7 }, ~7 G" P$ n- F
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
& n0 \) k2 a& a5 V/ v& ^5 G7 Q) Q6 I1 M3 }3 O; M
 1 i; G& k: Q% {' B& ?
( X% S; g# u7 R" B+ H. C! r8 wThe job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
2 U8 F7 n3 K# U; b/ h0 O( s; X" c! C- E7 Z* q G; V
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.
: h+ C4 ]7 }1 N# O7 q) i' X: {' g% S9 B# }& E+ v
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.& M' x/ P" j- j2 `; ^: h
# b: ^7 F- Y T! I2 I3 n9 u9 SGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
; G) i/ L8 k1 H2 X" `# j
/ X) s& z _' \4 u8 v2 K& d0 OBut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.# h2 L# m& H/ M$ P8 T
9 k+ t5 l1 T9 c6 W. oTrudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
6 J' ?6 ?$ e' {7 O* V0 }) ]; g7 U# }: w2 K. a, M# b1 T' q
Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.( t/ @, h8 X. H( ?( a* p% M
$ W: W# L7 Y# n% k& z7 K
“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
% M6 [9 p& Y5 o0 w7 F
/ e$ m2 Y8 e4 P( E+ }6 D: m, c) L“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.- T: L/ K) e" l2 R
1 ~- n, y* i7 ~6 c* k/ R
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”
/ v$ s' i) O0 H! i2 W7 U6 z/ Y) J
, ^) a, Y! t8 y9 o* P; [+ H( s |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 * A1 U) V/ F* I& ^
