 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
" N9 n4 @$ p6 W, h- s4 B5 T2 w9 ^3 h+ |; }. j6 {
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。' f* O: H- l' w
阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
2 g8 ?' f6 T! H$ i- F; D" [
, F4 ]3 B! V6 y# p, [( _https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse
) P: w2 B/ |' G2 ~+ m# J" N% s# Z6 s6 E# B5 Z9 D w
Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse4 q& e) O1 N _9 P
- w0 g" Q6 N& d0 ]7 ~
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is./ c+ T. @* f0 X3 E5 v0 w
: I0 F% g' j. r v9 ?
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.9 f' R6 |1 A5 E l, W
; u( c) P$ X4 L& W
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.9 U# `' r( p* L; Q
) e% X8 j1 R, C) }' Z) ?' @At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
% n9 q6 T4 w' G4 K' [6 h$ Y7 T) a' F% w0 c% Y( d. y! i2 r
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.+ O& |% |! c2 G. c% K) e
" H% L2 P& _ j( N i
But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.6 D3 `% U6 A* ~# G! c4 E5 Q A
2 q1 r, [4 V) R) J7 h5 H2 c“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
9 G, Y9 S: F3 C5 ?/ u6 \1 F& d- ~ g" M9 \$ r& i/ [4 D& P
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”& a( D6 O2 z: r0 _# L( h7 D
) p; S: _ W) O2 _% r2 e
 " W% s* Z' l o: a! Y2 ^0 Y& R
2 r3 b* b$ t* k8 X' f* {' Q
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.' j. ?. M+ n) F3 B
) {/ v7 Z8 B+ D7 e: SIt had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.
- I3 E c+ Y% ~# u, ~) u; w: J7 p5 \0 t1 P3 B4 L0 a
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
- @# E# n; z k4 H. F9 k. s7 F' s" Y; |% B4 ? ~0 H9 p
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.$ H n; C u/ O6 q# ^2 j. W( S n
+ O4 M7 f: b0 o) @4 J8 R1 M8 jBut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.8 [% A9 i. O/ A
: E, g, j5 K" R% T' `2 f4 |Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.+ r, Z6 x* n7 z. q
: w) E4 R7 \8 p% X
Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy. d) p2 s$ _% x/ G! ?
+ m+ _0 B `% f5 j0 ]2 H. b
“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email." c8 @" j7 ~0 `& d& E& O, Z
- d* K+ X$ ?" w( W
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.
+ ?) Y ~' e! R% |( c
$ b \: e# y: d! m5 x“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”& i, B& Z) Z) E# K# o) A7 H
1 n: g8 c3 C4 s+ F; \4 I7 ` |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 8 T. T7 ?9 J) x
