 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
) `9 x8 i/ p" c4 w( \; i' b3 w
' a. O% Z( W% |5 J
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
# `; _& j! Q3 [1 r阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗?请看文章红字部分。% R) v2 J; @) {
3 i, V$ Z3 m2 x/ `3 Nhttps://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse
/ \8 h3 z- |# ~( X7 ]9 ?5 k1 X; K+ i) O, Y
Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
# }- C; Q) g. K1 X! X( H l% {# b2 F: r" a6 f
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.
! I0 g$ Y |- s9 l! ?7 g+ V% H
3 l' U) B" M i9 i" {That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals." f( c+ R" M( y" B* G* P
. J: e6 ?! M5 C! x
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.) [, P, W5 P$ }9 J
5 q) b% `! t* E2 pAt one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
1 z' z/ C, X$ W0 B
2 R8 p k- d* D: B3 b U/ _ ?: UActually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
, X. t: J9 z" C0 ^. b8 i
, K# F8 M' @% p% `9 nBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.: y; R; N) ~$ M+ R' P
$ h3 X& h3 Z& A G0 W2 @3 [- }& U“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”* W' ^5 v5 e5 e2 d
. ]0 Q/ ?1 z* o* T$ T1 d+ m9 q
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”4 y) g7 H& g2 q3 O
, y* Q& f0 \. w0 a: `
5 f j" k, [) H2 A' y1 D* k, @
6 c# [4 x+ O% ?( P; v% g" gThe job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
! S" o) a7 P6 X, U7 J; u- R* J* Y( D9 M+ I4 |- ~
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.$ ]7 u( Y, M% E, h9 s4 w1 k
: J% F. Y1 ?8 C% @Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.9 L" F* i' d- i! g" i7 P
. S& d; j/ [4 F+ lGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.% x. S( Q- g. _3 a! y
- W1 e4 p3 J+ ABut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
" j. T, y- q: a3 h Z. h w* X( o+ p& `6 R P
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
1 [5 F( d2 k Q# C9 E0 [2 u( E& T/ o* k% P
Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.. Z, o5 X; j6 Q
4 ~2 ]$ l+ F; ]4 g“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
% }- G7 k; J, V% b& ?7 x- \' v9 M
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting./ v5 L* N& n' K6 w% P$ `' l
8 c; l/ C2 @6 ~9 Q/ J0 {8 p- H“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”
: Z; U0 q* ]8 l7 S
# B1 c# `' O& O$ G( N |
|