 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
9 } t. l9 r3 K# L
+ [" [4 M6 T+ V* @) D
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
5 ^0 |! G. e( m) @1 [ X阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。, I3 X+ }8 i2 {% u h5 V
5 c% O4 J8 R H5 I
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse$ ^4 X, T) Q9 i5 F. y
. O& c& `) L0 m, b+ tBraid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse4 E; X: y: G! e) g7 j
. q( K& z* D, A' C, f. }
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.0 h% \" M/ Y% _$ v. Q
& s: o' l3 ], y1 V4 B; Q# nThat’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.. K" A3 L! J+ ^
. h: m0 W$ ^# A7 b9 z4 G. G) D
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns." B+ E& }' @% B# O! O+ I
4 f/ [/ X& h) r
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”* l; V+ v9 }' s- u! M
" B1 }) u( f5 q5 G. r m1 f
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.( m$ K f4 ~5 e( c6 _) T
( q# B7 Z. c% c/ i& w2 MBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems." z: j$ r: `7 g' n6 ?
& I2 I: V. ]+ P1 G0 w) _+ C
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
3 C) y4 f/ y/ ?. v# L
, y1 a" T! ^- F7 `. B; W# T1 IPremier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”; o5 @9 [ {7 `( o
/ e/ ?; H( l; j9 k
' N% e' v: u" g" }5 b+ `/ h, t# g6 b5 c& h D6 Z) C+ a' z
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.' c2 p+ ?9 p0 G1 N* x2 f/ g
7 V/ z Y$ C1 b" D* Q- o4 w' `
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.
; r" }0 k: Z6 X2 g( H4 h/ I/ m' |" o+ E) X2 @6 E$ L, B
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.$ I: [5 j7 Y2 B! p4 }3 w. P8 { P% F1 e
( Y* y8 k) k% P5 _1 g0 i; [- a& M
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
s, F6 ^" b5 a! @6 \( k2 B: _* b: D \) f( U) V) N m! \
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
# d* V( H0 l/ `. Y4 N/ N; W0 @8 R
' B1 l( L7 }0 |, f8 XTrudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.8 ~. \9 w3 b$ _% j8 u& W) n
+ x7 m' f6 R- j9 Z/ F' g0 e: S7 K4 @
Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
. i9 A4 c) y( b2 p
( k, ~: q8 k1 |& [“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
0 }4 h8 _9 G, z# t; s; l) \: _3 o% s# e( H
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.
/ d" ~6 k* J0 Z, v b
. m. g! q. a! }0 s, o9 b- R“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”' V0 x* ~4 E5 Q8 c
6 C& K* A+ C" F$ C
|
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 # k6 N7 `4 x# k" c# K9 y
