- R% B8 g" l* Z1 u5 M' Q1 R 0 Y( }9 q0 o) O; USorry, I don’t see a correlation between my statement and yours, so to make myself clear:; c8 Q) a5 E' U1 a4 q4 x
9 X* y/ U" w0 K* aIf you’re spared from tedious household chores merely because you are the main income earner, it’s only a privilege.5 D! I$ E+ `$ r: _! ~% B
; k7 L0 b+ V7 _2 uHowever it becomes a right (more or less) if you can earn enough to spare BOTH from those. + {) k; G% l8 }5 U( [3 F
本帖最后由 SheJing 于 2013-8-21 11:02 编辑 5 f. T& C/ u- C6 e
小黄 发表于 2013-8-21 09:13 0 i0 ]+ v' S8 q! G; ~ H. _' m6 N: ]
想钱想疯了?某些族裔的一生就10个8个的生。按照您的逻辑,她们的劳动相当于100万了? ) x9 Y) W4 w- S5 T \) |" Y& T # l. [" H6 R& j我觉得一个女人 ...
6 I) Q& Q w! |2 a4 [7 d5 }- u
; r" u" x W; u/ N
You can’t value homemaker production by her implied opportunity cost alone. Not from the perspective of society as a whole, anyway. # d1 y" @) d, X$ m$ Q7 z: \( U' {- X
2 l' G6 J, x) e; U$ B
P.S. when did you piss off Sumash? lol.