 鲜花( 5)  鸡蛋( 6)
|
本帖最后由 bigsnail 于 2012-6-7 11:17 编辑
9 s( |3 m% {* I$ ~# u, b+ Q% _$ k
) v8 K7 w8 Q' w- aopen your mouth and wash it with detergent
7 K1 e6 r: {7 {9 ]+ i. P! c8 t# O+ }2 V' a% C, P
sure there is no rigorous statistical evidence because there is no way to manipulate in the experiment so as to fully justify the causality.
5 i; x) G8 \( U- }; r
! h! ` i$ i5 b8 c9 L# uAnd remember: 2 K% c! F# G4 d. y# r5 y
"there is no evidence that A holds"
2 R7 \( r6 h' I* tdoes NOT mean
* G3 {8 B: j# Q: l) z"there is evident that A does not hold".
7 C: N* l# J9 \/ TIn fact, A could hold. , I8 Z4 O, K1 R2 C2 {0 G7 c
It's a matter like observability vs objective existence.6 S2 F: ^, u3 ?8 h
So what you say doesn't constitute a refutation.- h6 A+ }9 m( u/ j$ l) m) G* y1 d
2 t% T2 i/ A1 }$ Y, S
It's mainly by argumentation. See for example:- Z9 O' ~! I# [4 ^! C# @
3 l, s7 i) N; M9 j
"Does the death penalty cost less than life in prison without parole?"
, F: i6 \, d) \. u+ nin7 E& i- [/ Y& t5 h1 `8 l4 E2 i
http://deathpenalty.procon.org/view.answers.php?questionID=001000
+ Q4 N' S3 m8 S& k* e8 s/ C4 j- E n7 x; U+ M1 V7 K0 {- m" O
Remember, things are more complicated than what you think.4 ?9 `+ c2 r) p! ^
|
|
楼主: weidsun
狗仔卡
发表于 2012-6-6 21:15
显身卡
楼主
发表于 2012-6-7 14:59
