Not all 鸟 live in 林子 6 l* ^/ _# b* s" ]9 r/ h0 K/ h# P, ?% R
The biggest bird in the world is this guy and looking for his/her 林子& D) n m( q- [5 p
7 j* V5 x. s0 A+ ?) M! C
# m1 N. y7 L! F6 _# S. y% d4 h) r# f( _$ G1 r, k- _& h9 N ^0 T# l
What about these guys work together voting for an asian face or a minor face? 5 `( G, \8 ~; N$ c6 l2 [# t. \. O0 o* C0 S! D
老马主张的医疗私有化跟咱们江前主席倡导的医疗产业化是一样的,有了重病没有钱看就只好等死 ...0 ^' Y J6 Q ?. C, T
jsun 发表于 2011-10-5 10:55
9 p3 ]2 Y* S2 I9 c( L' _! d2 |4 a
; c9 x# i& |4 @* x: P5 bAre you sure you understand his policy right? In the USA, 医疗is私有化. Do Americans 有了重病没有钱看就只好等死 ...?
Not all 鸟 live in 林子: \ K6 o3 T! h% E$ d. W/ m0 r
' k% `4 [& H. x( w) U1 |
The biggest bird in the world is this guy and looking for his/her 林子 C+ r; d6 O4 w 6 Y8 ~, f, i5 K% }& h; \ `122447 - \- T z6 Y0 F5 S2 _- S# k( ?FrankSoccer 发表于 2011-10-5 13:48
What about these guys work together voting for an asian face or a minor face? $ i9 F( b, L0 I0 q ( U2 I8 \5 n* d I奥巴马的例子就能说明问题。如果是白人只选白人,黑人只选黑人。他怎么也赢不了啊!/ w5 j0 ?/ l' J; w0 S
6 n5 k/ L) D1 V$ f
Are you sure you understand his policy right? In the USA, 医疗is私有化. Do Americans 有了重病没有钱看就只好等死 ... : I; c) n2 i3 x( \# m" r% ]3 l" M- {FrankSoccer 发表于 2011-10-5 13:53
1 p/ n K% c/ M/ V9 n. \ . d+ \; Y8 J0 [! F) y我没在美国生活过,sure不了。只是听说,从前的美国是这样的,大部分人没有医疗保险,得了重病只能等死。克林顿上台后,美国经济风调雨顺,他没事可做,除了泡妞,就搞了一个全民医疗保障制度。实际上就是向加拿大模式靠近了一步。
Yes, it was about THE big bird, i.e., his/her habitat: ' Y5 c* `6 c9 [
7 ]# A# a0 Z' l# V' T' _ i" Y
There is no danger and ostrich can have a quick sleep when wind is too strong.
我没在美国生活过,sure不了。只是听说,从前的美国是这样的,大部分人没有医疗保险,得了重病只能等死。克林顿上台后,美国经济风调雨顺,他没事可做,除了泡妞,就搞了一个全民医疗保障制度。实际上就是向加拿 ... [; e, Z- ]. T5 V+ k
jsun 发表于 2011-10-5 14:42
% O3 U) W' W3 e; _- T3 h
6 N! R# J. D4 xMe neither. But nobody attacks the US letting 得了重病等死. At least I never heard this before. Any literature on this, please? 6 ?( A7 }' O6 q% z# Y; b% U1 s4 D 6 o' z9 q% x% ^, J% A4 zAs for Big O, if half of Aferican Americans did not vote for him, he probably could not win against Mrs Clinton. Agree?
' r: c- j2 v* z4 M3 t $ e0 @( o! z! R2 Q; I* gThis is a bad argument. period. ' f Y5 l, n3 c0 Z5 J: P4 k6 f' C+ l7 c2 Z
However, Prof. Huang sometime has a very poor logic. Don't follow him when it just sounds right.