原则上讲已经没什么回旋余地了,但知道以前类似的情况,有这样两个不是理由的理由:6 N; \$ s4 a8 _6 f) f6 n: _
1.在高速上超速,被逮了个正着,后来他上法庭狡辩说因为小便实在太急了,不快不行. + n1 i4 A. P7 H& A2.还有个人闯红灯,也是没什么好争的,但他又不想付那么多罚款,他就说他是学生,如果付了罚款的话就没钱过日子了. 9 m5 e# z: F) _# F& g. b * U- B+ {& r* H1 |+ O上述两位仁兄都获得了减免.虽是下策,但如果抱着尝试的态度那也不要紧. - n" l/ N+ C' f7 ]5 H ^, m0 ~; }7 D. d
[ Last edited by 社员都是向阳花 on 2005-2-14 at 10:03 AM ]
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005 8 X" N8 w% Z/ l6 B- v' k% E% d, tThe title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb" $ o \: }: ]5 e5 i% X+ b7 H# [8 M% r; V; \+ r6 x9 Q) o
"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in 2004 and now range from $115 to $575, depending on the circumstances." 6 [! G. d5 v2 f. Y. f, I' L/ ^! v' p4 `: C2 p! ?
You should have a chance to ask some discount.
到哪里查看到这个报告? 请告知。 这也许是个突破口。十分感谢。老实说,靠着托时间我很没谱儿。 不过,当时我确实没有让那个行人受任何惊扰。 是他看到我在前面,先停了下来。那眼神然我觉得他让我先走。 5 c& _) D- Q. U' J& w# l' p* w4 H8 f3 \+ G; T f S9 X" Q" O3 I5 H5 f
4 l! D$ W8 p/ `! I6 c
Originally posted by yuexu at 2005-2-17 09:39 PM: / F, b( O/ d' E* \0 f4 u) bHere is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005$ x) l1 `4 c( Y8 E# K) \
The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb"/ p. O$ m$ w" F) @( \: w
" `! v1 c) d0 d3 F- G"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in ...
Hi, friend:; _+ b8 L) `) }8 E
w# B( v% g3 c+ J
Do you have a witness ? Did you see the man give you expression that you just pass it first? Did you wave to him after you passed? Think about it and make a decison.