原则上讲已经没什么回旋余地了,但知道以前类似的情况,有这样两个不是理由的理由: " N0 E& u) Z/ g* g4 L( Y5 g1.在高速上超速,被逮了个正着,后来他上法庭狡辩说因为小便实在太急了,不快不行. 6 R8 S n9 l v a) P' Z2 s1 k4 k2.还有个人闯红灯,也是没什么好争的,但他又不想付那么多罚款,他就说他是学生,如果付了罚款的话就没钱过日子了. " a4 @6 M+ `2 D4 i% K9 ~9 J. o4 L; |/ n8 C" k* z$ S# u1 i w
上述两位仁兄都获得了减免.虽是下策,但如果抱着尝试的态度那也不要紧. 4 I7 {. a9 h. h% C6 j+ F" N$ @8 \! ?2 y( V
[ Last edited by 社员都是向阳花 on 2005-2-14 at 10:03 AM ]
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,20059 B, u- x( }8 C- F7 t9 K
The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb" ) f% {- f# [& l% P7 o 9 J5 b2 v \$ h3 N% I ?"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in 2004 and now range from $115 to $575, depending on the circumstances."$ ?( `. X" d" t, M- _: @
5 I R! Y; v/ o' b% S2 AYou should have a chance to ask some discount.
Originally posted by yuexu at 2005-2-17 09:39 PM:) ?" V( |7 x3 x& L+ U
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,20052 h$ e7 `- P+ B2 h
The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb"0 G U& C# R% L( J% m$ \) T
: K" ?" Z8 V9 b1 [7 t; N3 q+ _
"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in ...
Hi, friend: $ X. \+ o* ^/ f# q 5 M; r* q0 b9 r, v1 Q- Q. Z8 u" @Do you have a witness ? Did you see the man give you expression that you just pass it first? Did you wave to him after you passed? Think about it and make a decison.