 鲜花( 79)  鸡蛋( 4)
|
本帖最后由 youngguncn 于 2016-3-1 00:45 编辑 ( G- s. @% o+ A3 `9 z. U
OneBear 发表于 2016-2-29 20:49+ z4 E' C9 D' @/ }8 C8 w/ f0 `' H% J% w
你对第二个的解释没错,梁sir被判的第二个就是你说的gross negligence manslaughter,这个是英国名字, ... 2 q4 b! M0 V( |+ g: {( d% i
}- N3 J$ t6 \+ S8 k7 \' x
第二个罪是criminal negligent homicide,是 class E不是manslaghter,class B,你就是把manslaughter和homocide搞混了。
' [/ M. d1 e% N% m7 ?$ x6 L8 L纽约没有criminally neugligent manslaughter,如果有犯罪行为的manslaughter,是顶级重罪,像你所说的仅次于谋杀的重罪。这个在纽约叫一级误杀。梁Sir没有被charge这个。梁 Sir如果被charge这个罪名而且成立,至少刑期是4年,而不是说得0到15年。
/ t4 c- D7 J5 l梁 sir被convict的五个罪名是以严重性排列的,第一个是C级重罪,0到15年,第二个是E级重罪,0到4年。
: I$ o) Z f+ Q梁 sir没有,同时也没有DA起诉梁 sir有任何犯罪意图和行为,梁 sir也没有,同时也没有DA起诉梁 sir有主观意愿去误杀小黑。
! U' {( V+ t. S梁 sir的第一个罪我已经贴出来了。
8 A. b# X/ f8 o' @' h8 j9 [) U6 {4 h5 u5 }- g) e
梁 sir被判的第二个罪是这个- s2 l! o- N* _
S 125.10 Criminally negligent homicide.
, d+ P6 w/ {. c& l4 | A person is guilty of criminally negligent homicide when, with
r/ |( T1 ?* E) o p6 Scriminal negligence, he causes the death of another person.4 R9 c6 F; h3 c. U
Criminally negligent homicide is a class E felony.% l$ }. V% a8 ~4 J9 i% i+ s
criminally negligent的有多严重呢。NYC是这么排的。
; S/ i5 [& Y: I. k. `+ c8 G% I最严重是intentionally,然后是knowingly,然后是reckless,最轻的是这个criminally negligent。比不小心还轻,因为太轻了,但是还确实怪你,没办法了,来了个这个表述。就像你在TNT买东西,但是你还是食物中毒了。1.大统华把保质期擦了重打,这肯定是故意的。2.大统华知道这批货过期了,没换,3.大统华太忙了,想换没来得及就被你买了。4.criminally neglegent,大统华正在换货,你也不知道,顺手拿起来换下来的货买了,这个根犯罪一点关系都没有。' } Q9 X; q. a( b: s2 a
% j% e9 K& E8 V. a1 L, G; z7 E, H如果这个你还不理解,那我干脆都贴上来吧。# n$ G6 j+ w5 s$ G
你说的那个manslaughter在NYC是下面这个。梁 sir要是这个,整个NYPD估计可能都要上街的。都轮不到华人。1 ^9 x7 U3 D0 t
' j, G8 Y/ ]$ l0 x5 W& nS 125.20 Manslaughter in the first degree.
( s- q* N/ f: V) C6 F A person is guilty of manslaughter in the first degree when:
$ x- X+ n& F" j* Z4 K: l 1. With intent to cause serious physical injury to another person, he' O: t0 Q* R9 N* G" r
causes the death of such person or of a third person; or
5 i0 l* [+ t1 ~; V 2. With intent to cause the death of another person, he causes the. b% I" w r; Q& } i: D9 }5 y
death of such person or of a third person under circumstances which do
2 @1 E" H9 N$ ?2 U9 rnot constitute murder because he acts under the influence of extreme6 _ \* e- e( `
emotional disturbance, as defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision one of5 ^) _9 f0 [9 N( M" V6 j( @
section 125.25. The fact that homicide was committed under the influence
" A7 p% n4 _( G8 l: Gof extreme emotional disturbance constitutes a mitigating circumstance
) N' o. Z" N9 F+ U0 C, \4 F' D% Treducing murder to manslaughter in the first degree and need not be/ ~# d& V) V" O* n' g
proved in any prosecution initiated under this subdivision; or
0 ]3 v* S" t6 D. G( `# c 3. He commits upon a female pregnant for more than twenty-four weeks3 N: @ E- S. T. T7 ]% {0 Z7 T
an abortional act which causes her death, unless such abortional act is0 B* t) H' L# Q. W) q [
justifiable pursuant to subdivision three of section 125.05; or4 Z5 U. q2 d. h) h
4. Being eighteen years old or more and with intent to cause physical; o* K, e" u1 U' ?
injury to a person less than eleven years old, the defendant recklessly
1 ^/ g Y8 ]6 l3 B5 lengages in conduct which creates a grave risk of serious physical injury5 F A4 f' a2 U) |' U
to such person and thereby causes the death of such person.# S O' a; Q8 b# W# W; B3 z
Manslaughter in the first degree is a class B felony.& y6 N$ E6 w! {, l
|
|