 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
& Z1 v: Z" y+ T
9 f" {7 c+ E# B诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
6 s! y) q) q+ |! y1 d9 }. k" a; S5 y阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。. w$ ?) G2 p9 c- ~( G* T$ S# d1 B% z
# s0 j, W% F: ?" _# O
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse5 O g$ n) F8 j; K1 I9 N
& K _6 p9 c" m+ K( WBraid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse- x4 |4 ~, T. K
0 t; d5 }; }& Y# w
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.: T/ M: T* k }" ]4 v
4 r& M/ i7 ]" Y2 T4 }That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
5 I+ U v% ~ L( p* w" X4 A/ R8 V7 J! @5 x P/ g
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.1 ]! | r/ S" H8 z( f
( Z1 m! B' t$ }8 r0 a% V/ g0 _
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
( X6 U" U: Q* ~0 Q
" h' W# B& r3 Y: F; p. @' VActually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.+ N9 L7 @& M) f( w. P4 P: L
- r; ~5 ?# T* i8 S
But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
+ r8 M$ r/ w+ R# p) W: {; t
" b& k' k, k- P7 o/ m3 F/ ~“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
, x2 L* \+ ]. j! W- k* u
% c7 U, N5 w* v: n, iPremier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”' E( I8 e ^2 M' n. T. F
) |; P5 J- Y! m8 }# q8 n 8 l8 Z: _# @3 i% s# e: z' c6 @
5 k. O: |* l/ q) }0 }3 q. d
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
u& n8 s; i! v; n7 g: c) O4 ]4 _3 O2 _" G
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.
6 u+ {; F1 F+ V* Q \3 [
" u4 P0 g) b: ]Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.) s" Q2 G' f d0 B6 C: Q
6 m# ^4 R: N) e' ]6 uGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.6 m- Z8 |* ]0 f8 x/ ]
" W9 Q+ l, u2 n) k0 D) T
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
! Z. \9 S5 T" s5 w' i; k2 |' d/ K+ h$ D1 r V4 a$ ?
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
: ^, T) y8 W7 q$ K7 w0 f
6 v8 Q4 V& z# BActually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.1 A- c1 n* j+ ~" s, x
, q4 v' U2 M% a/ h
“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
- w) n5 P( c, {1 C$ k0 Y# h% |, A! j( n3 i2 k' `
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.+ H: P: @& G. q# d1 D7 S* B6 v
- S0 s/ C0 b3 f' [
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”
1 ?3 s1 Q8 L3 [" G
$ a9 P% `( X' f8 N5 v |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 4 |/ j6 ~0 n. J) L, r1 k
