 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
$ v; e. I* y9 o N- J& m( V4 o. F. F9 [
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
- j' _6 B9 @! v6 [1 c, g* t阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。5 {! i J, z* Q8 q
* w. ~; |- ^, V+ m. N
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse
! ?( i% j! D1 X+ _- ~) E: d8 g G0 i7 y9 k+ n4 q- q% D7 s" S
Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
9 {/ R& N7 X. o2 X$ r0 ]
, o$ k' ]% U) ?. o' ROh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.8 v0 i( [9 `" [9 C5 N4 \3 L9 ?
5 {+ G( z: R8 s/ O
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
! `9 s* O" G3 v8 H/ _8 o) C1 Z
& {, S/ s) K5 z9 N! p$ XHe said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.
+ i4 T. M% w2 E& F7 [: b8 O% c8 X% K8 m: `# b4 g: B4 m
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”+ k! c& f5 U3 I; y# r ~
6 K8 y: q: N) H' O5 y. z+ qActually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
* C# D: b2 r. e6 A, S1 c1 m
* _$ x, B# e# p* W( I/ XBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
' X4 p- v3 v9 }; {# [/ I0 [+ u$ ^+ ], z% `2 E
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”2 t( Z- q/ o, f2 e1 q
* q/ k, [! g: K. @) j0 k* c
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
1 I# J y3 n8 b/ O/ @! d$ C6 W7 q" a8 y2 r7 J' L) g5 g1 h
 5 n3 G, W: T1 r/ Z r
8 D* w5 q8 k& Y; n0 b! `
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.* v# K) C, {% p& V
# a2 j1 v4 Q1 W; {1 N }
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.
s/ z3 b# G! c9 v6 u- T
, F! R1 y& t: L* c0 KNow it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
1 {' @% n, e( x' c2 W" K: k
5 C* a$ m. e. tGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
6 M1 H( ^6 \5 X& R6 e) D) O2 h4 ]( y- c
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
9 D8 A2 L& M. p" T8 S
* k7 _' ]; A2 \0 C5 dTrudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
/ d5 l4 B) ~" U$ M* ~+ q5 {
$ w, Z* w( Q: n( I) {0 r3 P% G. ?Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
) j/ ], O* {1 h- E% }( {8 S3 Q6 r$ x
“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.% Z6 G* O% [/ ?" A+ i9 V
& {* f4 b' Q+ K) c/ ]“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.6 a4 Q5 h5 ]/ h- [
# b6 |: [4 l$ E! O' K; s“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”. w. z7 f' L1 y! ~/ G9 P7 V
3 O# K9 c, z1 v$ M: x3 n8 C |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 3 N( _ H! w8 a3 |' q! l" \
