 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
3 p4 X3 z# h4 S/ ]5 n: K8 B- Z$ ^4 `/ l/ G! p8 `7 w# a
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。4 T0 p) k) R) u+ u
阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。1 l9 s! g3 d. g# i0 m1 h1 h8 T
6 Q: e3 h2 o6 S" a& J8 ^/ W
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse1 n9 B% _, Z' w
* V/ Z4 j* ?5 bBraid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
( R, K' s3 M2 H1 X- I! k* f- m! F' X* U
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.! u P2 R' l# U. W& G- p
" y; B- C: q6 O2 wThat’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.- H0 x7 U- T5 S
* G9 M- o( R5 ?* q# g' C- r* Q
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.* }/ M2 d/ O ~& w& q( R$ m
( Y% A) D* T& Y4 A1 o$ KAt one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”; ^( Q. o. s" B* O% y
! B) u; ]7 p) m2 `3 c4 W
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
* ~' s% M, b& X5 q8 i
' B( w+ m) G* k$ b9 NBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
1 \# h O" g4 ~% h o: V9 \" a2 b+ M1 l) e" v; }6 t* g
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
) \ n F1 n4 \1 U$ d$ h, c& p) M% |& M( }% x. Y
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”2 z+ V, e7 V0 f0 b: g1 P0 ^6 k
: t @; m, I7 C/ E0 A5 a ~
7 t; y5 b1 A1 A3 D- z: K6 D
! Z& u0 }; b0 t/ `4 ]. GThe job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
. m( |! T( U, n* T5 A) v9 u8 `# B) S7 w
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.( ~- k% h3 d' ~5 J8 G$ o
" y; [4 q: M9 a/ I9 [/ A' ^! V' ANow it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
+ D( S; S8 I4 X. K$ ]
( O } f8 _6 G2 x% P( sGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
4 i6 G* j g9 ]4 b) p5 N% }
}1 Q' _" K6 V+ u4 L SBut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation./ S: _( u: J0 T! b" p4 X6 ?9 h" a
0 C! f) f/ q5 c, c
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
_% o" a2 N( I3 d' x# w
+ {) j) m$ @+ L3 ?Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
/ c' X$ V0 e6 w1 I( b6 a* T! D9 R' R) H5 g1 ~, h
“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
$ |/ g9 }7 I1 r; f* Y6 Q% }7 p7 @" `+ _. O3 A1 Z5 U& l
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.9 l% F* K2 E: M! v# F: Q
$ k0 v$ E8 @7 W- h+ A3 @2 z/ w
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”+ H* g1 D: ?' m' h5 ]
' `' {/ s' d) c: u% X
|
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 $ e3 W& y0 Q2 w7 b& Z
