 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
& K* S0 O9 |' i0 c( f
2 u7 J' `* O5 [; B/ a
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
0 V# O* y# h, T U K$ d阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。5 ?8 c0 U$ o* U9 P% m( F
& R: n# H; \$ Uhttps://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse8 G. v9 d5 [$ O2 Y9 y0 L9 q
8 k; w! F: J/ c) |; g+ f0 S
Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
, u; f! u( i- j$ F7 }8 a& Z8 x" a8 W% Q! \
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.
3 z+ h6 b; |& G6 T( y) r( ^6 {0 @( \0 I% ^2 Z* M, h: C
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.. ?& S) n* Q. q7 T
2 C% O8 u/ O8 z" S8 lHe said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.$ u* }* N7 X1 i3 P& s! a
5 Q8 E2 F( E' _9 p+ H
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
* k) V/ v1 Y4 g- j; a
5 x% ?, U2 E' W# n. M8 `Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
9 J+ S) T5 _5 A7 g5 L8 T, Z" V, L" \4 K' M6 g [3 E$ Q) u
But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
" e8 o' Y( c+ j3 c; ]6 b" Q. v1 N: x1 j6 I6 i: j W$ G
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
! J7 w; k) f* P- Q, K; b6 ^) I) ]* E) _8 \
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”2 f0 u" M1 I' a
6 o' H- d% l3 ?6 W5 Q / T& Q8 \1 u( w6 k( h. t7 @
k( _9 _- q6 A' Y. d3 p; ^2 m3 Q
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.5 l- k# q$ a+ G, ], y! G: z' f# q1 d
7 Q& K; m( l: v: o: H
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.( r; Q9 ]1 Q: r8 }& P- O# P6 @
$ f4 _+ _6 V! h
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.0 s6 F+ `$ a0 W
, X/ M7 S+ t+ F' H& B) EGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.9 S" T0 }4 k2 _4 |, L
' a4 a) j* n. g2 P8 v( w0 t
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.; [# P. J+ w* V) G _
- e. ^ p3 K" M. e$ I! f1 Q" A
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
# ^/ {% ?0 _9 D& E5 Z, } ^1 D2 a& x7 c
Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.* }$ o; t$ b ? M; m. \
5 c( Y$ n+ a# \( Y4 m1 o% \
“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
( P9 C. f: ?* I6 s* S5 g
- ?3 J( l8 b1 C2 @& ?7 x4 `( [“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.
; E' n1 o- V8 ]9 t, ]: d7 r
) G+ M" g9 S3 c' e“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”
) ]+ c# d$ Z8 U& |( @3 K r# i
0 u6 H# y# ]3 x, { |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 / g0 {6 |$ u# t4 r; Y
