 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
. G4 o. ^! P9 j8 i4 M
% j6 L1 y7 K. z5 d诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。0 V# G& M& u3 m
阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。; v4 p4 G4 n! b2 W% G1 D
2 N; C" E( K9 W5 Z1 A% Uhttps://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse) n. t8 \" M H
- _. E. H& n5 P* O+ O3 X9 u
Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse/ V* G- \* I& N9 T1 `( {
; k1 ~) _; g, T bOh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.% ~; |) ~3 d8 I3 J
/ U3 S& g1 e! q$ h3 i; V cThat’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals., {, n$ {. ^$ ?2 y+ V4 J! }- s
) W% _1 D; S; E& E( }
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.5 F8 F2 v2 T# P1 v( E- ]
; U; Z9 k& X# d$ g/ sAt one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
! g! z# \0 F5 @# I8 N7 C; J; c/ _& l! D1 S E" ?' n2 d9 p
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
" {5 ~; q, \+ P3 n
) S* b7 ]/ J: P; S! t4 EBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.# m5 P1 M2 p6 j0 K" }) I
5 h' z; A+ p/ K& q; a( F“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”: x1 [9 A% X6 \ z
/ j) \8 z/ f) O w' U5 g! c4 M0 P
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
3 X* }1 k0 U: k5 {( m/ X9 ?% q$ M, ]2 C |4 w: S8 h. w
 / U$ X6 w: n o' [ z. g
+ H' _9 x$ N7 ]* n8 r3 _! o
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.% U; c' L3 A4 p
4 l& x% a) e! b7 q7 O, i
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.5 [, L+ K$ Q; }( V: ]- h% ? ~
; U, Y% i, G$ z/ b% {+ G% t
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
4 V+ W# M0 r. r' l6 |
`' {" s( ?$ D; V# W% ]0 `0 {( t n, IGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.+ G8 h5 Z: L/ ~" K! U
1 z- Z$ W- t W4 r+ S
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.; c# S7 M0 w7 n! ^, l: S) Z; k5 y
5 ^' M1 x! h0 ^9 F+ [8 o" O
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.7 c4 Y9 F( O: _! b+ x9 S& z( M. o
2 d9 B& ~. m2 LActually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.+ {; K/ H7 I7 w+ h9 h) V P
: }! h; u$ `1 [“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
7 ~+ ] l) [, x; M2 y
1 I& o6 B3 q$ ?% d0 H* K& M“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.0 J8 G' z. L# y9 ~1 Y
+ a( y. M! X7 p) B& ~( K“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”8 |; f% o: I) K# @/ z
6 E) u2 d- f6 l7 f, K& F# s |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 : O% J! G# \7 H( e) F) |: [
