 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
! D8 P: {* t" U( T; K& I5 h+ q" c9 X
0 _2 B# k! a+ D! m( G
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。6 v' N' B" X' k5 e+ T @
阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。+ t5 E% G, j2 A* t( y
2 \& Z2 u0 E- D8 L% Yhttps://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse$ _& R2 ^! ~! t( {
* J9 H# x [( [( p' IBraid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse) A! E1 ]; X5 i
+ T/ Q) M) ]1 j8 f+ Y8 KOh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.
& ^. D5 q9 P2 g. [$ J3 y! u) D" r3 K0 B
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
9 Q. p1 U% M6 {2 h Y$ w' I$ ?8 |! p: n+ j( g% [% F
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns." B" ?' S8 {8 X6 X; W
" r& l$ k: y( Y5 K/ W
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
6 r5 ^ b8 E0 I. `! x2 @# Z9 k: }4 n/ z! m1 z- j
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
# o+ u$ g: V# o
# Z7 W3 z" C7 r: L& B# aBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.. U8 h8 ?& i6 U& y
e, M7 y8 R5 H
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
u+ D5 s7 P* Y. P) @7 T; v5 n7 u, R! _% ?+ `
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
5 g- B7 p& M' a/ u8 O
4 m6 {% e; H, v% B( K
8 P: V7 {% T4 @5 \& s* Q# P2 a4 A9 T% ?; b
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down., R! @# v# P% x H
+ M W, s/ f7 P, T0 D6 E! @7 ?
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.
0 g- d2 @0 ~0 P* y8 p |; ~( O0 p; o6 |5 }* I
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
N& {: l3 n2 z: ?& T/ Z
) U5 Q( g7 g c* e& bGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
1 J. W! v( ~2 u( v6 D/ l' k' v: y! Z% }' x! X) m0 W; B O, W2 y
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
3 F1 h O6 p+ r( Q' U% a& H+ @% Y! k; Y# h7 K0 m& g+ I
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
0 z" k4 L- P, T% G+ t) _7 r1 I* |/ N G$ s7 \
Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.- L( [2 z% a0 K
; P* Z- S6 m) l7 A# c7 o$ q( p; u“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
3 ] G2 l/ j0 ?: |/ W1 w
6 p# o8 Y3 D4 X“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.
) d1 u( n$ `$ t Z3 [7 U0 N5 `+ p# {! P9 h
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”
7 A- {' k$ S% _3 h* n& M8 J# g' l& `# k5 f0 k0 g: A
|
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 + r) c) p a$ X S# k
