 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
% D# o: c0 T5 q2 @$ a4 C
$ Y$ F- E# |. z* c, R诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
: ?9 |4 W: ?4 r8 O2 U7 ?; t阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
" ]2 x2 K+ C+ ^+ b6 E1 Y6 {1 _: H" B' Z2 | |
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse
& [+ q% h% A9 d6 q! t: ~3 j# c7 v2 G8 ^
Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse# H! `1 E, j5 r, n
- v X; Y$ {! b- r$ LOh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.$ h6 d. N* K' |/ K6 R: b
% y9 l3 ]+ ?- [# i0 S& ]. QThat’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
+ p, E2 b% w' w+ |8 G0 A9 D0 G4 J0 E+ N8 h
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.
* z5 l4 Z5 a! N9 I. C3 p: r8 a( J% M( A1 H# Y! \" O" j! E' w4 _- w
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
) ]# g* }" i& {1 ^6 ]; E% n% W% C; S. E: A% r( d: G- H$ K
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.0 f9 O- @9 Z5 r5 N; a
6 z/ |1 B& y5 ^! }/ ^0 _7 @
But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.8 j2 ^, F0 l \9 N) g, r
; b3 U3 X o7 \0 w/ V1 i3 m“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
5 j) c/ n! s" k& H8 [
3 i7 y+ }8 F; X/ u; u5 OPremier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
( V$ l' K. V! _
9 C, U$ L* N7 g |! v4 ~" Q
! p: J- E! ^& d% ?, k% h9 C# b' j5 E* S1 e- n2 @6 d" ]
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
5 P) M* e2 H, d( H$ F1 F: t: d
+ W1 f- I9 B3 y1 d8 m" H `It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.% ]! |3 Q P' b) `8 \4 I0 z2 p
C( @; E, W: B% n" l
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.7 Z+ ~. X1 Q: C! E9 t# {* C& E
" m3 }$ N+ g; D9 K, T7 U6 kGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.% f- ^) ^0 o) W" [
! E( J2 u9 m1 ?0 P& K4 iBut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
. X6 n0 \# [1 S4 c% t; J) l6 g; N1 ~1 V. O1 ~
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.* B% a2 w3 B' Z5 t6 `8 h9 D& G
3 y% f7 Y7 B# PActually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
0 u: h1 s1 v2 g3 K; L* d8 m" ~# U
6 K& R9 c3 x: o# j2 f' \/ q1 R& j8 i“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
! \- b- Z) t0 u7 Y5 y
1 _$ U1 n. q# T- v* G4 x“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.- I: q+ X; g# F% |
2 E7 O* e& z+ e7 k9 f- g
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”
B6 f1 C& i. q9 Y+ i+ N5 q7 ~" p+ O
|
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 
