 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
/ h4 C$ G: P3 |" B9 H
/ p# H* J6 `. y; u7 t诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
0 n. ^5 y7 |9 k" t* k3 d' i阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
" Q" G6 \) y T, p
; }7 `' `" |! i, Y" |7 Vhttps://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse5 E; j4 @1 }. \! |4 A8 J7 }
! \/ h: E& `0 d/ S
Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse% l& q V; _/ T: c$ p3 Y8 u
; v3 O4 r6 G. G, u( q5 ?& gOh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.
; a" V9 d( h9 x- r2 g" L
* X; b) R' [0 E* Y$ G ]* OThat’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
* ?4 Z) U; k: i7 m6 |/ o6 @
: p$ w6 u/ t6 Z1 e; \; mHe said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.* l5 x9 X9 G; t. C! I& A+ J
: K9 {8 T F- J7 I. L6 fAt one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
! _( a5 c. M/ K5 W1 V/ C& w6 b# `! q6 T$ u9 X7 `
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work." |* Z3 i# ]9 J1 Q" v2 v) ~
6 A, t$ w6 n: G8 q) w
But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
' p, I# d" N7 p3 Q- z! n) w+ ]5 r7 @/ N9 `+ C
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”! A1 ^3 a5 ], S! u& v
/ o' A2 c# I" d) @( h( Q& o! k4 i
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
, H @- B! s+ P6 ^: v
. t" L1 \5 b Y* @* V/ o& v7 u+ W2 o 1 H2 f! c- R: a
% y! C4 c# Y' V6 g# ?" |The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
& E$ X; l# s" i6 I+ u! k' P
7 Q( d4 f; z. j0 J q" |8 L! u yIt had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.
* O: _0 T# U1 J0 p
+ u: b- X* k( ]) P) dNow it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
( I3 {( P7 t* T' i- \7 P+ q" g3 P' x3 ~, a" K
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.. N9 q6 H3 B c0 p0 D N5 j
/ p- s) w1 u* d# m. P _0 h0 cBut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.! V, n+ F8 j; I; b" f) Q W& a& h
0 Y( L5 n+ ]$ CTrudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
, P" i6 n3 D8 X3 m
9 C( P5 V: o6 F5 Q' eActually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.+ P$ D* A. l7 b2 d
/ b! A. _. q2 G0 u“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
- N+ D" M) g, B) V6 x: D3 W% b5 k! _& C! D* I, s
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.3 M: l" j/ L5 W6 w' p; ]: c, l( e
" ?- B9 F9 \' ?; S6 W“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”7 N0 Z+ g: }+ N. A
% p1 c5 n7 [+ E
|
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 : a: \% S E5 S$ T9 Q! M
