请问各位这个房子如何

粽子

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDe ... p;PidKey=-829276348
) h. k; z  {; J/ _+ w5 `+ k
值这个价钱吗

ram

我认为房子不错。

skybird

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDetails.aspx?propertyId=10659596&PidKey=-829276348

值这个价钱吗
; Y( [. w( T- O: K: f/ ~2 _粽子 发表于 2011-5-12 16:04

9 b- g- P1 y" N2 F! q' ]) v3 @; b去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。

ram

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。
' w, ~! {1 W7 F3 f1 p* cskybird 发表于 2011-5-12 17:37

眼见为实。

健康营养站

good.worth.

icing

not bad, I like it. And the price is much lower than gov. assess value.
Tax Roll: 9982751
Assessed Value: $497,000
100% Taxable: Yes
' b$ t5 H2 q: @5 O% }100% Complete: Yes
" F! ^; r% p9 v4 GNeighbourhood: Richford
Property Type: Residential
Land Use: 100% Single Family Dwelling
Lot Size: 467.092 M2 / 5027.9 FT2 / .115 AC
) j% o/ S4 r5 W4 Z) i- WBuilding Count: 1
Year Built, Building Class: 2000, 2 Storey With Basement
! D+ L( R! r  S: X: _Approx Living Area: 201.4 M2 / 2167.9 FT2
. O$ d! g9 Y. Q2 j4 C  ]3 o(Does not include basement area or 3rd level of split level)
, Z7 s1 [9 c+ H" KBasement Development: No
Garage: Yes
0 @! }# e  Y( Z1 ?) rFireplace: Yes
0 ?) M' Y7 \6 {9 WWalkout Basement: No
. v, o: {+ G' h* e) m) yAir Conditioning: No

uil

the position is something need to concern.

Stethoscope

it looks ok.
* t$ y# w3 k, T1 D) Y
you better get there and have a look on ur own, then you can get something different from the pictures.