 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:/ U4 q' C z. V, ]2 Z* A2 I5 b
6 Z, r! y& S) P" f# bF4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。, Y4 H! C) W) O& b' v7 }+ X. P
4 ^9 a8 _" v% a
**********************************1 v& U# {, S/ `* N8 [! |
Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:: w! n- D$ P( X/ B g+ u
4 V0 H. A8 w+ R
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.
( a" w' C1 t( ^. d* P6 I) G" i& Z$ n% [) \
2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
c$ ]9 L2 b! G! l8 |2 R1 C" K; l8 Q# _6 A2 h
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.6 o% `+ L1 z; I. Q1 K
, _" F3 f" W* y2 x- p/ c0 b
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
# X* d8 J4 T2 w& G! i; A. \- f" V, a% @
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|