 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
# D6 }, n$ D& L. W% b" E, t" y+ [$ N: v8 B( j. a; L, P, V% S
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
$ S4 @9 k# v9 U" c. g7 q; C
! P- [" O. G( M9 c" W**********************************
3 u: T- B* ?% B& v. SAnyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
# d) Y3 c" E$ C: J2 A. Q1 w9 Q1 L& V, o) Q$ z7 \
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.( h0 t( ^- C* x. D" A& e
. ?+ D* o; X& T, x0 W2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
2 n5 d$ O7 U j' Y, L3 T! w- N. y
9 W- O# y/ j' a) T% ]! y" v3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
: k9 r3 D# A# G! u& U$ ]1 b/ v P7 ?
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
3 Z6 a6 c* e& ]# U! K% y' J/ X0 t' ]3 n
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|