 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
1 e+ f7 B7 f# F3 V& b/ K8 D! }& _4 M8 M) K. }$ Z2 X5 ^0 w0 l
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
, ^+ g* L0 ]$ D; u( @1 J
1 F% k# n, \& P. A$ Q**********************************: ?" b9 g- l. H4 X/ [2 w
Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
8 U0 k2 o) s: J2 Y9 j+ z5 O& }) k
7 j* l1 C! _7 }- }$ Y7 E) b1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.. z e+ y' [/ a, c( z/ o
. G* |2 H, a- \' }2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
, r6 Y6 r# D. N5 R7 Z; N) j2 O* I# o* R/ @
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
6 ~1 {* t( w9 u3 E3 B, g; s$ N5 O* e9 Z3 k. Z" G3 I. I8 @% W2 C
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8. L+ n2 ~( q a$ r2 A: h$ Q
) ?0 E/ J6 e' G0 g3 k# M9 N2 N
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|