 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
' l" @$ G8 [( V. v6 v
: j2 b7 Y ]; [# l( a) O: YF4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。6 t. C" T* N7 O1 W8 h6 {3 t
* N/ |6 ?5 g: v" {+ k
**********************************: |: B% u- x: P7 N7 S
Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
! ^, S2 g0 o) ^ ~5 T- `6 @( ], e0 Z6 V* S
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.! w7 N, P' b9 D+ v) c9 R6 L
1 K3 u: C2 \) z, _$ {' i
2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
; V6 {# K; o8 g3 a! D2 j3 x; e7 U5 p m4 U E1 z
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
R& h& z) s1 m& r6 i* X2 w. J
4 }5 C& N# `5 d* M! K2 F4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.2 ? _2 @2 B. E; m
" c. a7 s2 n* U' F5 \' |2 z& E0 ]
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|