原则上讲已经没什么回旋余地了,但知道以前类似的情况,有这样两个不是理由的理由: 3 U, H5 U/ u: S+ t$ q, R8 E1.在高速上超速,被逮了个正着,后来他上法庭狡辩说因为小便实在太急了,不快不行. ! S: Y: I8 v3 a; |0 U2.还有个人闯红灯,也是没什么好争的,但他又不想付那么多罚款,他就说他是学生,如果付了罚款的话就没钱过日子了. % X! E a3 v' D$ G7 a6 a+ m. }' @1 } \0 h! W/ L, r
上述两位仁兄都获得了减免.虽是下策,但如果抱着尝试的态度那也不要紧. + L9 C' n4 ]' X: I( l3 f& H$ h. z7 `! I, g0 o4 D
[ Last edited by 社员都是向阳花 on 2005-2-14 at 10:03 AM ]
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005 9 n4 ]; T. B' lThe title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb"- n9 Z( @5 u2 q* o" I4 V
& c9 z' ?- N' o4 z. y3 m
"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in 2004 and now range from $115 to $575, depending on the circumstances.") g1 M+ g7 R; U% ]( r% P
/ ^( g; s) V A: X) O* O; |8 g! |0 X. A: V
You should have a chance to ask some discount.
到哪里查看到这个报告? 请告知。 这也许是个突破口。十分感谢。老实说,靠着托时间我很没谱儿。 不过,当时我确实没有让那个行人受任何惊扰。 是他看到我在前面,先停了下来。那眼神然我觉得他让我先走。 7 k1 g/ h) t. z- G& B& Y" L 5 v, d6 U- E0 Z4 t5 R1 ?% G. L6 f; `" d% H+ ?, c0 M
Originally posted by yuexu at 2005-2-17 09:39 PM: $ f$ e! h# e3 H1 \; q) z5 H( tHere is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005 : p$ _- o! V0 \" X9 _& H/ w( _4 IThe title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb"% L' P+ @' t3 l7 |: S
- s1 v/ o. d* o
"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in ...
Hi, friend: * U& B' I: s5 k) f2 s ?& W; f# Y- K; {2 |Do you have a witness ? Did you see the man give you expression that you just pass it first? Did you wave to him after you passed? Think about it and make a decison.