 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 # ]" G; t/ ^+ i# n
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!/ T5 u$ J( R$ I9 N; h6 \/ s
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
/ }! m2 W) B5 E D3 O& Y+ Z0 l2 T/ J/ I- ]% ~$ \; u9 P
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。1 ^0 f$ ~) P% q5 j" B0 i, ~; `
, f# M) Z* `0 E; F- d6 r( @1 j安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.. B6 U3 A+ a: P
2 U0 p8 a* e$ Y2 h" R& h, M
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?! ~7 r8 _, \1 e% {$ f$ Z
% g! j+ z3 M3 ~! \9 j' S
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
g" n3 k4 n& j5 A5 H
9 P7 [4 W/ \: \. v+ Z* K2 i关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
4 r! ^* b" M2 ~Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
, e7 |: x" O8 j* C% B' A
5 L( u8 H! e8 c$ g' V, aOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car"., K8 n% q1 b8 g0 r6 l
, A9 l7 U1 y2 t$ V7 X" r8 d8 VBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.4 A8 X/ M, ?7 R: a: X$ V- A
/ E& y" y3 s7 J2 E* N4 E[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|