 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
+ z: U0 W$ }! R- i! }# i, d楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!2 K" ?1 c: Q$ m4 E1 g; o
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
: @. ]6 }9 J" D; _! e1 s, z0 g& P$ Q& m3 T# f2 @. S
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。$ z* B6 _4 O4 _) w) \3 V
1 e: s( d6 ~6 d3 z5 ^& A9 ~
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless. C* x( W, p5 w" i
* Y; S; L/ Q# u* G) T; g- m3 _不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
" z) {, z" b4 ?9 L# H/ T6 O S4 L$ J8 A$ P
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。* j! O7 k5 `. `+ u# T- u
0 v) r6 n% H, `; D
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
! E$ X4 J( g; o" O/ u' VYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.$ _; B# l5 S4 l1 B3 G
, B: y. _& o/ Q2 m' EOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
. O, f& W) S$ }% I- ]! d5 s% O7 V: U( m+ H' W( P, b
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.! P; K+ L. m3 H% G( @
) f8 @% r# |9 r! O0 m
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|