 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
7 j! N8 n4 u# S; u1 \8 q; A楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
: @* o5 u( \! M8 acorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
# G# N, y) J2 v( H2 m9 {. M, |
6 g& w- G) m: t, J/ _您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
1 U5 N, ? g9 f# K/ m4 T) [! v
7 u' k7 j8 n+ B3 z* y* s; P1 z安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
8 z# x; S ^! V1 G) y, F# Z8 G' U2 Q& y4 z: k: _' ]
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
! a1 p3 r ~! @7 u8 [0 E8 [+ r' B8 U# k8 K5 x6 R$ K! N w' n
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
7 f- f" T' z8 y0 W0 o' b6 J7 ~3 W& }8 W' Z$ \( B7 B; U
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
1 i3 |- I$ M" z/ QYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers." b" T. ~; X- E; y
6 V U% ~/ j, l- ^
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
9 I' [- J6 t) F* x& w1 z0 W1 k$ ?/ h) O( x! ^- d0 H
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.4 ^4 h; ~$ y9 i. Z
9 G* v2 i( l% t7 v
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|