 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
5 {2 w& N% P0 Z# V, ^; D楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
! A" m5 A) h, k6 P0 _/ Z/ Mcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
! L6 Q4 Z1 \4 H; ^+ b7 Z# }% C5 F. e- M) b
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。) D6 d" `0 n7 ]; u8 r T8 p
/ `& e( y1 I- x. _1 b
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
* j4 T; }) Q7 {: w- h0 {+ X
! X, I0 }5 G) t) \1 k不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
5 A, W# \* z$ q* b
" Q* o b1 m+ j% [/ y# w( X _另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。8 S& m; b- z$ n9 k( x. h
$ B. L$ O) V! B& v, ?- z( N( z* U& @关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):1 }% B: v( z d; y4 ]. k7 R1 A
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
' ~* k. \) G5 }. w. n
0 ^9 Q, w' F+ Z3 n9 zOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".& @) v. \/ t( s8 Y$ O) ^
/ g1 Z8 Y2 ~ Z+ f, i% ?& I
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe." `5 B, X8 u- @2 x9 i/ n
: |" O& u1 ?4 }" b$ q# |
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|