 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
4 B) x E7 J* F楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!' ]! a7 X a! T3 v8 |; I3 ~
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... ; r& s& k- ]6 I6 `) `, _+ _
; G ^& D# r( d T7 Q( J+ r" o
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
( M; A( Q5 Y+ r1 R5 G6 x7 A7 e' s2 P9 Q+ x" S
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.* O; g' H2 b6 p& C" H6 Y( d
# B. ]* W3 ~7 x5 D2 Y+ B不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?# \) t" f) H' R+ n
r2 J& h1 {1 J另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。/ B3 A% r- L4 L5 f7 z* L" O
* a7 L4 `* \" C8 J: j$ y关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
2 B$ W0 ? g# `- eYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
) s4 _7 k9 I% i* G+ j) r# }5 _* c5 y/ X; g: q
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car"." I' @ u7 a, [4 E; }1 r. b
8 `1 F" a1 d6 v$ i1 a+ XBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
+ ~/ S7 Q& N6 Q$ A. ^ w' ~4 ?8 e0 K
0 p6 w9 n1 X1 z# x; x[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|