 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 5 n4 s* }% R& P
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!6 ~4 s* B0 c" C* O
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
+ V8 o% v: B3 l, l
9 ]; X5 V2 w) S0 W" @5 A# v您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
4 _; o7 C- {6 `3 H/ ~1 B
& U+ r) Z# Q9 U( ?: x+ t4 y安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
5 B0 [. Q$ n' Z2 I
. o5 S* u: T. H不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
% D: j2 T5 j! P) x
- `) `' B2 `5 P: g0 ]/ l) p+ G另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
* m7 R6 z* B, C/ [' b8 A, P+ S& b- V0 N0 d1 S
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):# E8 v. g7 ?2 F }5 F# Y( U/ ]
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.. f; W' e0 x# F' [9 v+ A. `
8 a+ F, F! q; C& ]3 i E8 V" sOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".( d( V; C* X! i8 Z3 T: [" x
1 o" x' a9 q7 a0 q2 C [
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
) @5 x7 s" y5 c/ c; ?5 N2 U- a4 }" B, h9 @4 I! x
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|