 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
5 A9 |) J7 H- W6 q; e& v+ ]& g
, }6 C' a- g3 k; [
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
8 d4 r3 E" w+ [& W阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。4 q5 X% Y" ~) A$ T( f1 L
) ^! V* n1 G9 ?0 D0 a% B
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse( A/ W) U4 ?3 k: P7 ~. Z
9 c& N' v# P" U( Z. w" J# R
Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse* V, y! p1 Q4 t- H
1 ^, y- e( y, T7 n+ B) [
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.4 ~6 F. z3 k3 `& I
8 ?* @; _! b% a
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
# @" f: n7 j3 n+ y! x) a+ U6 }! Z( I( K: a3 T+ }" J8 f
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.
. W/ l3 n7 T/ G7 `( X5 H e/ G/ W& q! Q6 p! _* s
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
' p h2 s& I" O7 k$ M5 F! e* @7 I
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
8 r8 O4 N2 q d2 s8 o1 ~ X6 b" x5 c
% Z9 n, y0 L" [9 F" u7 {& E& x( CBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.& F0 }+ B4 Q/ |$ N( h0 V+ R" {
, X: ~. N8 M5 E
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
2 H1 {5 @' k. w5 |2 S; M. @
6 P, b& J; ?( P: I; h3 K1 vPremier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”" R( d8 E9 ?1 X7 o5 C4 w) h
) `. Z; {2 V. C9 ?$ o4 v9 @
0 i6 s. s/ H1 S% K0 o7 U* d: o' f& E
/ C0 D9 U8 g) L. f- E9 H* KThe job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
! n+ `$ _) z7 [: a
7 @( T0 f! j% [) J3 VIt had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.
" b8 s2 k8 `9 T$ }# n7 c6 ~ `
8 R: n* c9 j4 F( A o: qNow it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
5 T: A+ g) Z7 h: \* |8 r* I. H+ s; J/ u, A" P
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
9 C- [+ @1 J$ @: u$ N1 g2 `3 F$ U1 N
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.3 u. e* D. G6 I
2 l) [8 N) n$ ITrudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.. Z" f9 h6 W& }$ V9 r3 i
: w, a6 E$ }8 ?3 z" I. ~7 i6 _Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.1 n+ D. R1 K3 Y& f8 f
% q( X' Z* s! ~# I7 w0 N: M
“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
1 c0 t% R# e# Q% H# W
: Q- h' G+ n& i1 d7 ?7 \3 U! S+ D$ s“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.
: }$ t! O |# \8 O6 H; t* F: O9 G- s. n- k, ~8 J8 R. z" a0 a& i
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”, `* @8 L* l0 ]( Y; G: A
* Q- a* [4 X- E8 W
|
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 , I. |* F7 P4 g
