Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
. j3 h# X+ `: C' G( Q% [
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
2 n/ s1 Z) r- S* E
Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
5 {. g+ m+ f6 s, I
& ?. {" x( w4 K% jTo calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:


) @4 @7 I0 Q7 C6 BIn Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
6 D4 F, N; ]  Q( j4 n  r3 @" Z
3 Y* F# F, K/ H2 k1 Z& BSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
. c# @4 r5 b6 i5 s  WYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
5 t- q  z) |! q9 z: `" N
If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

6 e2 M9 z5 I+ U$ ?1 cIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
* w# y4 m! H+ w9 O, |, z9 s Avg. 1988-2000 2001
* t) _* ?9 `' r* z9 o1 h6 dBoston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
+ z. R. K. k3 q: `Seattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
+ x- X$ H+ T) k$ b3 y# QChicago  17.2 20.8
+ S" ]$ Y, y6 K2 P9 i! TWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4

* Q; b  Y; Y* ?; l* |9 Z8 l

It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
' R$ I" x, e7 ^  V' g8 g9 Q

3 O. V8 U1 `. z1 K" J1 bFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
* X- S7 i& E9 M3 F5 ~$ {- y
1 b( X1 I+ q% C" j8 w4 o6 S1 O7 yit would be a good reference.

thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

4 q7 Z; ]) @! l1 o. V6 O[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]