Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
' r3 O5 Y7 [8 dLeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
6 l# C9 A0 T0 z; [. G) K
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

  H$ `' U# M' M4 L$ t% _8 TLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:

- F# ?( q9 F* E+ V+ K
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
4 m4 N& e- N, [$ V9 l1 }! @; G9 l- `
7 a" L2 r( ]+ m* h8 R  Z8 q# HSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
2 m. B6 k/ I8 `5 rYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
9 L7 }3 A' m2 F/ g  A# z. x9 i( `
) R2 y) X, |" \0 }4 \5 r& OIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
; F+ Z8 l+ i; e' j9 D+ z
If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
& L  }" Y3 T- W5 D Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
! S$ j8 i( u8 E6 q+ R9 vSan Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
% o% g8 q5 P/ B5 ]8 f2 kLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
: M" b0 a) V# n0 X3 m/ m9 P; WNew York  21.2 22.5
$ ~* d8 i$ ]+ P0 v# rChicago  17.2 20.8
) y; r! g* e$ z# n. ^Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4



It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
% |) N! ~8 P& @

' a% N" g; |' ^  ]/ @9 vFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

it would be a good reference.

% u9 {$ [! \/ A7 [! \thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
9 P; d' s. A. W$ z+ M
[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]