Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
7 X3 v+ o  E: w' j  a; |2 {$ r6 K
% Z9 U, H# K  T1 ^" p* A1 W' Y+ eNot everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
: A" s* G  g1 m# _7 F6 j
  m1 J7 t5 }, N" H3 {Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:

5 N9 J1 c  a, D8 k
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
4 O, o' O% \- G8 }, p+ USan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
% M# m4 _  R5 A; z2 D4 ZNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
9 E4 `2 N; [! L* e* b- \. \) j0 f
0 p, s+ l% o4 C+ O3 ]3 LIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
% s9 D% p% @- x' ], K
7 Q" o% L0 P: j( m: R Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
' ]* g/ X4 A7 L# O7 u. N0 {4 \+ a Avg. 1988-2000 2001
5 M+ {- G6 H) e# W% fBoston  20.5 30.2
' `0 s' q" D% R6 VSan Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
" Q( P) n9 N8 F9 @1 \Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
4 `$ m8 C' k, s% v! ^5 k# QDenver  17.7 23.7
1 ?* w$ Q' [; s) T8 fNew York  21.2 22.5
! l+ j0 M4 @, P, ?/ @; I' NChicago  17.2 20.8
4 o& l. [9 G5 Q# JWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
0 g  w4 Q; z; W5 z7 z. G& S! h


It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.

+ v1 u0 e5 H0 Z( _
From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

* U/ ]1 q5 F8 Vit would be a good reference.

" h- e4 g. z% {8 }0 Q  |( M" Z' E) Uthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
* @& R9 A* b8 ^% K2 Y" o
[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]