Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

6 {9 Q! z7 z2 Y  ^- d) oNot everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
, V: h. }2 K; I$ k4 x, I# o
% B2 }5 g2 X. u% w( t- j- z  pLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
! U& ~) y# G; |
5 b8 z! T/ I" C) q4 [- vTo calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
1 J8 K3 O9 K1 \  H* L1 y

; r# N8 G! [6 l3 }5 Y7 w0 GIn Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
% Y7 N3 o$ K$ z& {5 }
San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
: `2 j3 N& V6 L5 QSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
% h, i+ c9 ~, iYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
1 n. I9 Y  F7 z# L% C0 U
If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
8 E- y& v0 l& O0 W/ G" f
If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
# _4 `  M  G* L. @1 N1 a6 _8 vDenver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
5 z8 s4 J# C+ ]9 j5 P( H0 tChicago  17.2 20.8
1 K. N1 e: M7 c" D  ^8 UWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
. C' B5 U" l; O( A

" e+ P& w/ z( s% W6 V
It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
0 q6 }* m" J7 R$ |% }' z3 ]3 k
/ i9 |% O8 X" L/ M
From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

& R# f. ~5 Q5 O/ r% ]3 ^it would be a good reference.

thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

: ]: W# O  R+ i+ {7 U[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]