Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
3 P  h- D" X. T9 ]
* \( E( ]) z# uNot everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
) H  {5 }( b0 K+ |5 l6 m6 w- c3 B
% v$ l& Q  Q  yTo calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
6 u# v; [2 G1 I7 k* u  A

  G1 c8 Q, Z1 CIn Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
! U/ @! ?& m8 z) n: u7 H' k/ U
& @$ n3 i9 g$ R. |( bSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
2 B+ _% B9 ?. t1 B! CSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
5 m7 l6 d( i( z" PNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

4 q9 m: C6 H& @) T; d# k+ fIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
8 P: S- x7 e7 p3 [, I
Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
9 ?$ l! d( L3 D& INew York  21.2 22.5
& ]5 }8 m& f2 m4 Z+ ^! c! zChicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4

% ^' V/ {' s+ o" m
3 Y8 p* ^5 p3 ?! n6 w, Z
+ t* Y7 m/ T" H& tIt's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
- Y) [$ N+ t6 b& a. q
% y% F: N0 z2 _+ z  r; C
From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

it would be a good reference.
/ A! G6 ^" v, [. K8 |5 w$ c* O
5 Q: K2 s2 m/ Zthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]