 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 6 x4 j1 k6 ?, r3 B( N& P0 Y2 `
6 ?+ G) Y4 k2 y( K& c
& Y3 e( [& p$ S9 uIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. 4 w- ]( r/ T( s" k( ~
. P) x; _( v, j% O
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03& y+ P0 U6 k- f0 t' b- K2 h
: h( x$ j) [( f' g5 M+ O& H3 Scomparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..1 @* b1 ~2 p+ f5 w2 j* T5 }
/ G1 v( y$ S! p1 n0 v/ l) P' H
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) ' f5 m0 l- s1 |6 W% j
|
|