 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 " d3 o# x9 w" ]( c) W/ e
! e, C0 ^/ ^0 m) j% L0 K8 t; |/ w, a& A+ P0 b. |5 Z7 d- B v
If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. 9 D; Y$ _" [+ p
$ @" u( |1 l, l5 V! j) S% j
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03: j' h% }" J8 }& y, i
" k0 p \. L$ f$ s- d
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
: @, E( V: Y' N, U
5 d1 n, R0 j5 [5 y9 `' ONote: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
" K7 {% i8 @6 s |
|