 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 - B3 m" i( @5 G' x3 E: {. y
Edmontonian18 发表于 2015-11-29 03:14
! I; |0 V: X x7 A& G3 v* n2 `! ^One party 2%, the other party 2%, total 4%. Still a little bit less than tranditional 7% of the 1st ...
6 |; X" p6 \* W% \4 c* v
( w u: t6 y4 N% D: @) o1 iIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. , ^7 ?: M5 a9 W f9 K+ r4 E7 I2 A, u
! |" z( z4 Y# e" e }Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.039 g, M5 j3 {& T8 S3 ^+ n, e
, E2 k9 M# G/ M8 y; V Ncomparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..& b1 l7 {0 r4 w' b' X4 I$ D
3 R9 p3 n' B O6 r$ E% O: d
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) , i0 o: t2 |7 f2 j
|
|