 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 a; ~6 |, D1 @$ @
Edmontonian18 发表于 2015-11-29 03:14
6 o6 Z, B5 M/ p) C* q9 E+ D, E! LOne party 2%, the other party 2%, total 4%. Still a little bit less than tranditional 7% of the 1st ... + d% ]8 A3 c0 S( z
: o+ Q$ n$ ~( ~* k$ C. f- n
If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. # P) e; `4 Q6 w9 H# c! }8 E
s5 z" y3 T8 G9 KLet's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03! p. q3 B: p+ K
2 [. e- i# u$ H) h
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
) ^' V# F% r; E0 L: j2 s0 y5 Z8 w4 k
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
/ A8 F, R$ V; V9 }6 a |
|