 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
/ J, `1 ^ S2 G+ m/ \1 [/ H0 `
8 i8 [! h' j0 ?8 m+ B; d6 \9 G# a) @/ ^- M# P1 q$ D+ m
If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
7 P5 k; t; y0 }6 o8 r- G. E% \- m$ j5 D8 V
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03& H: ?+ ]% d( {$ I/ j5 y" L9 Q
# Z' m, y+ [$ l1 F# @# `
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..& f3 [, X7 `0 ^ X- r8 g
' E% t1 P7 F' ^" }
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
) ~$ E1 N% P2 _) } |
|