 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 * ?( k- w% F& ?, D k8 @9 w
" t! D- F) E2 h+ Y3 ?
+ H# u' t b4 V: |9 T3 z+ uIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. % q& t2 ?* E& v$ ^0 Z; J( Y
i1 S) b7 r/ h& E6 M
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.038 z; s; E1 |9 n6 n% p- y- T
3 }9 e' J- H: c$ ^comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
2 A- Y- U# e- c0 l) B9 p! v! Q7 U6 Y) c& z0 Y# T0 |
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
# V3 M0 A3 E1 B$ j7 m |
|