 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
, p# x' c4 \' E+ E* F& w
% {4 U* o; i" A7 I, y8 C3 @' p- ] g/ e* o4 L. }1 X) e$ P- c6 `
If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. ( D+ X3 P" f a( ?0 \9 y8 ~) }* h
! E% G* i2 U, s: ], lLet's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.038 c# N H: s" u; d$ O! S L
- s: N# ^; Z7 m: Lcomparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
0 C$ l- D6 [: ]: W* ? E& f$ G
8 G8 ?4 n( ?. RNote: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
4 Q/ G0 a5 K0 \( t9 X* ~8 h |
|