 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
- ]! s4 H1 A! h; h1 N/ D- y6 E$ A
! R- O" _ I8 A% Z" Z- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
" L. Z; k3 g* {# g9 T
l5 H* G) J, w6 A TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
7 C9 i/ } x" p! O; s/ Vexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
6 W. H$ e( F* B6 o Jquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic+ y% t$ r' W* Q6 W! c! t" {) F
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
/ `! i( x0 O9 I0 d6 l3 _price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and3 [: S9 {0 d: D: ?
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,! M7 r$ b2 r- M$ f. O
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
; O7 n% r; e, q1 r9 @LePage Real Estate Services.' D. k+ x, F, ]5 n% g8 M# x5 }$ s7 r
1 V$ H2 ^1 a. c% {0 _% g# L
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters& h1 X7 S: C9 u8 G! z
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
: @' _% y& h3 \5 A4 X" Z. E' C4 {conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
. d9 n# j! T+ p% `! Ssound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
2 ~1 O# `4 ?" e! n" ?residential real estate sector.
$ E6 K) m# x' R, \) x
2 V V, ~. y8 I& K Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
. h! @% M6 y# L7 Ooccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)% J4 G& T) a! Q, m
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5620 S; c0 g+ M+ O& r/ k0 `
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
6 `2 ^4 a- M4 t6 U) P2 s# D(+13.2%).! o* J# B; F+ Z. ~
! H: O) M; D4 ]) w" s5 ?6 i; K" w "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth3 j/ G( z1 I/ x, J4 v2 A r3 c
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
0 F: N' U' O' ^7 Pfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
: @$ j3 R; k' D' ?* Y! Ypoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
: H5 G" M/ V% A- Dpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
* e7 k( n4 l7 }: b"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
- Z8 Y' c) R" P) o9 ?# ]welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
8 m$ `& |2 E, g3 |5 @" k# ?) G( i Gbalanced market."
8 K8 y8 X& i9 w" P( i% R0 m
7 k3 [- ^! o8 D: n9 w Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
2 u$ R+ V! B" x: I, M( ^( nconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
; s# B6 m, z) ?% Sto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued. z1 M& S6 E Y8 V+ }9 ~' Z
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
: p& D' [% O, E* @! |energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
; H, P3 q; t6 v8 Pmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record5 c! o/ G2 u+ {& Y& X. L
breaking price appreciations. z) W5 L8 V8 v% O% z. ^
5 t* H; z4 \$ } L: Q ]# s Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
1 R3 W, O$ Y: f5 k3 deconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
% s/ I4 \* `) J. T0 C- A7 R) U5 Wlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.1 Y5 H3 Y4 U; g1 G2 G
: o } \% ?. f$ |' Z R: @! e
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
. i3 D% P3 u3 I2 j, [. u2 Neconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
# V" P, S: [. u! n2 {3 Dconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
1 @0 c: A4 ~ [9 m Z$ L: v: l# nslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth. t2 Z" |6 {/ X# s$ k
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
2 p8 s. n$ a9 cgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of' i. J/ t1 Z8 F# H: V: Z @
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
+ L: y: E' \1 P: ^+ r& Y# m+ P: p8 l
' D+ M- K$ e$ n0 X, O) U While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
) X! V- B. b& Z7 wmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
2 w0 h1 { k `; e! ]3 ]* l" Dfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
5 ] t6 L9 L! Oare markedly different than those found in the United States.
, W$ D$ `7 R7 A6 O2 Y1 s0 R# q/ i0 i
- C8 M$ ~( P$ y; J( J Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
! W8 x* y$ V# B+ @* q& n. _( |American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's# O* b4 a4 R; O% ^# L. t s
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the$ _; I$ K& j- j' T2 w g
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
8 u6 s/ |( o" ^, c# Taffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
% E& [* h0 @7 xdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
8 z- i2 G; K( Q/ K" daggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
+ N7 }+ G2 k5 P9 A8 fmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."( K$ Z* V" z" M( E+ t3 L0 D/ i
2 o% ?' F. b6 S* `/ N1 s
<<9 [0 ?3 J4 E" v1 { d
REGIONAL SUMMARIES) n7 n, j- V! \
>>
( d* U* e$ ?* ?0 q
' Y$ Y% ]2 y; j/ s Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
9 \+ X- b+ ^ B* KHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate. t" O& y* O& \% J6 p
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time5 @" h3 i/ ^: O
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
" ~( U7 Y, G W* Erenovations.) t* ^9 ?4 D1 k' D& h
, y. V. z8 p) c2 t' Y8 [: V The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
( D" o8 b/ v, M4 d; l: K1 s& Pincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
) T% ?0 b+ [) _compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
- v6 B* m. w2 G4 J/ y! A" k4 ESeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
4 N0 Y: b; l* y9 U$ [" R8 ~/ b- V3 p) ?+ W! N
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer9 ~6 b) D3 S3 p4 q5 h7 N1 G
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
) R/ ]4 O$ h* a( X& _$ tquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
3 [- h k$ _2 T4 H600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
! Z& ~0 L' \: @: i9 dto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes4 a4 n/ i* f) {9 w% I0 @
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.* t! P. |: R8 u" {2 T4 a
T. ?+ V0 Z% d! \2 N+ t0 L) A In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
' R+ s% I3 ~, H% n' D" vconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their7 \$ F% q5 p6 J6 y2 u" C9 q
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
7 H; q* p, F( a" o7 j) Q$ Fwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
3 f- v6 O/ I" j" w5 A( W+ |dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing. b7 I! m/ [ m4 j* ^4 y
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
- E0 v4 j* z% i
* z; A. w; N0 w0 L- y Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly7 r E F% G1 |7 c
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes/ ?5 M( D: _7 Y9 V5 L! G& i( X& E
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
" N& k5 [+ Q Qas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
6 m3 j( G! L+ s" u5 efew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.* I% Z2 j J4 {- G/ v8 V2 a) S8 o
, C+ X9 t% C/ S/ B5 w) n/ G k
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house$ N7 o, k+ k7 }3 \/ u" V& @
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
- \& Y& P! |, Q9 A' E! Y4 W! x" \: tlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
; c( O0 V9 T0 p' _7 i) V3 ]first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
% e& I6 b! }& [3 f/ ]) y bwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the K( N+ m' L" E* S) Q
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
4 ?% e* G. D1 c/ Bmaking a purchase.
1 o" @. P5 ?8 F3 S8 o" i
1 ?. z7 c# a4 e" m Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing b; q/ W) E# F' Y3 A+ C
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong& c7 i ~" g9 J' O
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
! o- Q M4 T& Y0 bcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting6 ?5 E7 J7 {. ^0 d5 l3 Q: q5 o
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown: u: O B L- Q, U/ k4 c, d% k
amenities.
, L7 @' m7 S# ?& r0 M- W$ a) n6 h# W" o s3 q
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels( T9 o& R; _/ W! t/ y6 K
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
( D$ G. E) s3 T$ i' Z) Y: ?across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
) L4 M, @5 l& G$ r4 G3 O' Ncontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
/ X! F$ A2 a3 kdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle1 S( _8 G. @" u5 b! w* o
residence, rather than for investment.8 I2 h. q0 N. F9 b7 p3 j4 N
" I' p( c8 M' N9 M. e2 x& k1 f
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
& c! E! b: |( b* N- {1 }* }& Shouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
6 Y) ]9 m4 u0 {) L; Zin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer' M- b; F% Y% s9 J2 p
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization* n7 D+ E: c" {% k
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
2 N" g' S8 P: {7 n0 athe market.
" c+ }6 }7 W# e$ A' t" t9 l. J/ V. M8 T4 Q, O
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through0 [* e; R/ c# h$ t; u* `+ f
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
) @- b8 h9 w/ T; r5 y4 J" SAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring9 [8 A6 k; m; P$ S4 R) {) h: Z/ q2 y
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
% k5 B1 Z4 |- J( h; Zto the shortage of available inventory.9 l. _( W8 v7 r1 \% Q
- Y- ]* t* s0 J5 I
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
* X/ e$ Y9 o! ^, s" z4 \( Zmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
4 m" U) a: g6 x3 U, D( m% zvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses, q! v, |+ d/ i
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
/ P1 k( F6 _' r X3 T0 m+ u4 O/ X5 V
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
& f( l3 Q! W4 n& C9 }1 i8 tin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low. m9 e5 g" m* X
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
0 F3 y5 n: P3 V( w5 `/ L% ^" r' Npressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring) ~, H; O# v5 X, ~+ x; ?8 d
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer7 i7 @$ R: S* S& b5 f* p
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as/ h/ l& R( D: Q: [' a+ p0 I
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.7 E0 \! e7 y+ y- D
9 c, `1 S6 _8 @7 ]/ v( X; F& J% T
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
9 J1 n: `7 T. u# h3 |) ]8 }8 Jas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton- V G" H& o5 a ]* g9 \7 p
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
4 U3 X! V0 U" Rmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
* @: \; N4 k) B" oincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve2 [ y& w# x; T/ J' T* \
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
2 s/ \- n& O6 Z( }+ vtowards the end of 2006. 8 I9 o& f5 Q' N7 @* J) D& d( X D/ T
v) M4 y% g/ L1 X9 M2 P) u
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of0 v; M7 w$ r! D3 ~, o, B( c! h
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable/ X. p& y; {( _2 j
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
0 w) o7 v3 T/ z* X+ W7 Ygroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
1 b0 K( u/ b' ~0 D8 ~foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
, N+ L+ W/ [+ x; h8 \- L$ hpressure on tight inventory levels.1 T2 z8 I1 E; N
6 N# c9 g6 g7 Y4 O Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic A0 F+ _6 e' U$ l4 Q* y
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
, T: L7 G n; x! ^2 M% r! z4 m7 ~5 yinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
% _- O5 Z! b$ ~4 [9 Rwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching4 e4 v6 _/ Z" I& w5 H
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.8 r" V' ~: j9 v i6 N3 _
) G: X: T$ x0 A R- ~" H1 R8 y <<' ]( y) _$ b7 G
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
. y! k) k) D) H- ~, c" `; O
# a* D. ?9 { G: \% z: b0 [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 T' B5 T W6 K2 L2 M5 O Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey$ x0 f7 N1 ^9 b2 a1 }+ f
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 V s; _1 A0 ^4 m* X( a9 k( Y- k( T 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
9 v' ?# g+ D. G/ ~% W Market Average Average % Change Average Average
4 z/ L8 }5 h) a2 b4 E6 i" c -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 p; R- t+ B8 n# [$ c) s" F Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
7 a9 ?- C7 i3 y9 _, B# c -------------------------------------------------------------------------, I9 p$ Z/ S5 g4 m
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000( y$ k7 F! R/ m1 @- f7 Q# O
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 K- e" w4 O! O9 n' D$ a. W Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
4 s# z( S g& \8 M; j0 E) a; F q" T -------------------------------------------------------------------------: m w# h7 X5 {
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
& a/ V! ~* x8 P. E -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# [0 w3 E# c5 I) u1 K St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
% ^0 ?0 n1 u. n, F5 i$ s' h -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& j% r1 s" O" h' J2 z. H! m Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583+ |2 V1 O1 N6 J$ D. J2 h
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, _3 s6 |) @6 @- b' t9 y7 ~ Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
9 D+ \) E" @5 K& X% b5 L% {# D -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 `0 e4 L! V1 B. G
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
0 b6 X! z! y6 X3 |, j -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* D" M1 d/ N+ Z8 A, x Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,7661 A. u5 Q# h9 J7 A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ _& W" r7 v2 J+ e
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707! }. d$ }* P l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------9 T. t* A4 q1 _4 K! O. K
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500! L4 U- o' \( B7 v$ b$ X" v4 z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 E" Z% ]" u" b% |- O: J9 U+ y. q Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,3894 ?4 f6 S% V& X1 D' M3 r
-------------------------------------------------------------------------3 V/ m* h1 U7 |+ F' z
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714- N' h3 V2 v% G+ e2 L. d$ l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 g+ L" m8 B# s4 R: |
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5008 T/ V2 P$ P: @ P4 ?7 ^- z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! I0 a: W0 z; f! D1 B0 L
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
, a r* U; I/ h; K' I6 L* f" t -------------------------------------------------------------------------! g: h4 F& w) L( M7 |
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
5 m. a, S. t* O- c9 M -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ X/ L. Q) Z2 p" `" {& t1 i9 }) o
* | k/ o1 v) l" V
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 b- f5 c: ]7 ~6 y5 h9 j, c Standard Condominium" ?5 P1 w" T1 {2 l/ C! U6 w
-------------------------------------------------------------1 O% j2 u( N* f" m* ?
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
9 E' y* S2 [ ]& T3 Y. L Market % Change Average Average % Change
' f/ K" w; q1 n+ f# E$ E1 @ -------------------------------------------------------------% U" q( G- x9 b6 h
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
4 {1 ]* f8 {+ [' w -------------------------------------------------------------5 ?/ T: G$ x( ~- }2 k0 I# i: p
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%# e3 y! M7 R6 a0 \
-------------------------------------------------------------' Q& C1 w" Q& D o& M" v6 h
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A7 \* S& r; W$ X- j+ N: S
-------------------------------------------------------------
0 h" c9 A( T( u; m! E( E6 S! s Saint John N/A - - N/A
" x) i1 L# ]* ]5 S# J; D& d, C' } -------------------------------------------------------------
& w" H. Q' X* V! X @8 G4 c St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
6 e' M, `2 o% z -------------------------------------------------------------$ X' L2 ?( k: }3 U& e
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%$ v2 N! z" V& x
-------------------------------------------------------------
: G Y+ N2 P* X0 D2 @ Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
" }- k0 p$ j5 }0 N! H* a, E _" N -------------------------------------------------------------
+ L+ D$ y0 O( j, N4 Z( ~; A Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%# U& i# w9 D& \3 r( `: D& [
-------------------------------------------------------------% u: T3 a( o4 S S4 v
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
% M% P8 R$ ~9 [6 l1 d6 k( N' Q% E- u# m -------------------------------------------------------------
9 k. k, Y$ |% d) Z! D# A" s q+ O Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%; y* M$ O5 B2 [% Q& z7 p& e
-------------------------------------------------------------% V/ t+ f4 ~0 k
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2% X: {/ Y1 o7 l0 J* Q1 Q
-------------------------------------------------------------
: @& w, x# n& |6 V Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%( f: Z" a. K) E% e% Q: W+ ]
-------------------------------------------------------------1 {( z9 {: W+ g+ F' a( r
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
& B( o! k8 @3 G -------------------------------------------------------------
# l' h5 W. w* A/ y, Y% P3 a Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
K0 ^# `! U: D5 X/ x* w( c0 v -------------------------------------------------------------
% a% [7 d& e- H" C2 b Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%% O- \% b$ o& M# l
-------------------------------------------------------------
0 i$ L( Y0 U6 y6 u( @: J National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2% t! f8 o1 y; R9 e
-------------------------------------------------------------% y; n' e8 r; R% ^" S
>>1 g N H5 P C# J# y- X/ t5 ?7 a8 I
+ v% R. }# @' g( n Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined: R0 e4 [7 n+ A# o+ }
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint2 O! o) b& Q# Q4 v3 T5 R
John and Victoria., K. G. e+ T6 S9 F9 |
0 v+ u- S! ]" I9 m5 H
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most* Q7 J# f$ m5 _9 H7 U; k
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
+ {8 j5 u! C8 K# i, B' T; _housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
# J* Y* D) A8 _7 _8 o6 E2 \references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price% W( i7 v" f) O# ~6 o* D
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
* F/ H/ J- t. Xacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
9 n; G( o; Z+ j) q8 favailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
0 D2 z+ [6 R9 r0 ?, |, N- u2 ofigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
- g. c( h1 q6 {; ~, r2 [& R6 pversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
4 v+ O" ?, d, i3 ^0 t' ONovember 15, 2006.
7 H, X9 E( H+ _4 e% t; R Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
. @- ~- J* w1 J2 Qfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
- q% ^2 b0 s4 Y) r! q/ Oprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
1 @3 E o* Y& i3 e6 u+ g4 ~& yavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|