埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2750|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
* d7 {  q+ I4 u: a# v* S( n# }; n3 m! P/ J9 ]& J4 r6 P
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -$ [: t3 P6 `9 J) w+ C

4 M1 s+ j# {' S7 X    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market, _8 k4 H- ~) |- _$ C$ b
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
. B, b4 q$ ~5 i3 R% v$ l: T: jquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic: ^% z" C& f% M; K  @! d2 ?
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
! k( J, c, q2 J1 d+ ~& C$ uprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and$ X0 Y! y& W7 ^2 X8 E
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
: q" S$ E5 }" vQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal* F, w. f& a9 }) }
LePage Real Estate Services.
( e% z' \: R7 v0 q. T5 ?# r+ Q8 d+ ~1 i
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters9 y+ v0 J/ U" D1 x
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic; g* E9 R5 e; c& r8 E
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
; C" m+ ?7 K2 Ysound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
9 B' L; y1 S+ F& B3 oresidential real estate sector., z) H0 X; |9 [% S1 s& y( e
! I2 m+ I$ ?9 V1 }+ s
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation& }- W  s5 t0 l
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)% t6 `: v: _5 D/ G+ j
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
) Z" n# q, D# B- @( J(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380( m( f& T+ V! o9 @
(+13.2%).9 ^2 f- G- _$ u" x
  q' Y  K& F& o- Z3 K
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth) R4 a9 q* x- D/ @3 D) ?, `
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the0 l, M7 A% u6 ~% \. P2 m0 l
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
& c+ t; @1 }* W9 |2 npoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,3 b& `2 _; i% p% C6 W/ \/ A
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.4 f$ J) V% E# o( g! _! @7 V
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
- G$ F! G, I0 owelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy, X5 h+ W. N/ Z, x
balanced market."9 i' x8 @* c( ~5 h4 D& W7 q
# g( `; l' |0 H' |0 }) s6 C
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices," F3 \# D5 [/ {4 E7 k
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
4 I! z" k. d- M8 b1 _2 f7 i& w7 Jto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
) ~7 t/ C5 z# B' T; l6 ?! {throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
3 \2 H  Q; N2 H9 q4 a( n, r# benergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
. b# i" E; j8 u$ j. \. ]# s" ?2 \manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record; q/ ?& ?3 @; R( h) ~  d9 S
breaking price appreciations.
* _( `& h, F$ \' `* m$ U7 |( o4 w6 p: F' T
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding- N/ e6 O5 q9 ?4 m7 A4 y
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the! e/ D# H( j) K; t" i" j
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
, M% x2 h4 ], E8 Y4 p# b
' ?% o/ C- y+ N6 k2 r& o6 L    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
; X4 C5 W: ?9 }# \& a1 oeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer) H! ?! ~, F" r. {& l- k3 s) `( E
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
& ?4 Y9 q  P; E3 Dslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
8 \" ^- B7 s5 kIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers, K: j2 w' y$ z/ W+ M& u9 M
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of. ?& g* S3 t, @  O, u
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
8 h2 ^: E. o( I# N9 l& a1 t
2 n' u1 H- L0 c  [" c    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing+ i8 i& y  @- ~, W4 D. B
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and; ?- G1 ~- |9 }) X1 L: e* V
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
+ K2 q; i1 C& S" i; B* F" c) Uare markedly different than those found in the United States.! B; D% D7 X: l2 S  A6 F5 L

* Z1 c0 B% Y3 u9 {2 h3 L$ {9 r    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the, J6 I3 x" Q, F
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
: V- p; ^& T1 ?2 o8 A/ [( d2 Sfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
+ [2 S# S* l: Trelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
, g. I! X& q3 V8 j; _0 c+ H+ T( `affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
  f! w: Q; E2 R8 rdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
/ E9 U; a9 m/ m7 u, N" E( Paggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
' G, t7 S4 p# Tmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
+ U0 X" l- |+ k/ X) ?0 }
0 N1 F; R2 W3 Y/ \/ g; T; Q0 o* P    <<
1 `  C' D% k- T* ?8 C2 X" L                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
4 ?( f8 V: J4 @7 P- Z1 r% g, O; v    >>
. q% ]  n. h9 C* k- l1 ?5 T# H. d  W- \& {; d
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
6 \/ L" q* j, b( @! S# NHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate2 e# @8 b4 H0 P2 e/ a: W, C
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
% @# a: b: o5 z/ ~" i/ L5 K3 klooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
: P. G( r2 v4 ~$ I: |1 Crenovations.
9 L9 ]" I+ G* A" |
1 B3 S) C: y' L    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
9 A) o% I* ~6 xincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
& m6 W9 e$ c$ E1 }0 hcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and- g* [7 n& Z8 `7 N: d
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.2 E: a- Q3 j: G1 M, N

6 H1 e! e# s" B" o    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
& ?* B" P9 p# c: t) k& yslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the6 s1 F7 [# c# H# \+ X4 }! A
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new& m+ y3 w" |7 ]! @, w( c9 W+ z
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
+ P6 {) Z0 f) `' Y0 |; nto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
; Y2 b/ w) O  Uand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.- I: A! F& x7 p8 c. r2 U

( O, l7 A% m1 R    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced  l" ]$ m. b# K8 U0 s
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their3 O3 u) e% P0 }5 @( j
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers4 q% h8 ~' k* H0 ^1 u
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
1 V) h- ?; f# X& wdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
, k  {( `4 h% ]% Z1 ubuyers with more options when looking for a home.
8 [# o- \# r+ p% _
' J2 j- x: u) Y$ v* k( L* t  i2 T    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly# V7 C8 y3 Y6 q6 }3 O" W% I: b& `
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
8 W/ E  n7 m" @priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
/ g8 O0 l0 X/ d* ]as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last) m3 M$ M+ V4 x- ^0 t7 M9 I8 j
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.& ~  P  u7 [( o

# m/ e8 S% [8 X8 _  `    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
6 t0 b# O% J; ]7 m' X3 [# cprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
& O) Y' A0 q/ h& v' ?% \6 zlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting) O$ v7 h; Z! \. ~, c) F; @% v
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,/ N* ?' h' d# E% b- ~
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the9 \6 }3 d/ q/ O# R8 d
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
1 ^0 V2 O2 l) b/ j- Tmaking a purchase.  i2 u, U, d3 F( l; d; ^
# y4 o/ O: R, K: Y+ h  t
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
/ Z# Z/ C! J$ Z+ n6 gmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong; d  s5 B9 z8 P6 r1 y
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
" d2 j9 N% O" V4 q, Rcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting: B5 g# ^, r# _: P8 s0 {" _+ @
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
  T1 u$ p0 k% }9 f* damenities.
( X% T3 _; R$ [# c
/ Y7 ?' Y2 p8 s$ M  Y% i$ n    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels( m4 |. A  @, K# M) J
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
! i& w* i. y# s3 o! O5 p- Eacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has3 \0 K) N9 W4 v+ |4 [1 g
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been5 t- ^! C/ k3 {' F0 o( Y; a
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle* \+ l$ R' }% n" Q  {  }. b
residence, rather than for investment.) w1 q& G9 l. V4 x+ Y9 z

1 {" o# q" M1 C. Q" M! I    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
5 X: v0 v0 }) l" Thouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted1 s7 d8 M1 e# P8 x
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
$ }9 k, u. Q6 C8 }1 b# Z5 q! econfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
" q+ y% W# Q5 vrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
+ [9 g0 ]' T) O% M8 J4 dthe market.
3 e2 ?9 ^" r0 F7 e( g1 G
. |! |; w1 X/ e* U4 D& }4 j' }. [) B    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through* c  j  ]- d, s  }
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
8 D. j. o) E) D0 HAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring' W, `: @7 C1 A+ z! x
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
/ a+ N1 o- G7 J1 C8 Z0 N# V. P# pto the shortage of available inventory.
7 L5 \4 R' C8 I0 g
! K8 u$ C. y0 d0 _/ a( q! G    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
" A2 R1 N0 T2 Xmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains# r) {; [# F$ V8 Z* Z9 t6 s
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
) c5 M1 A; ^9 M8 \) B6 fstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
: B* s" [3 K  v8 h2 X" O7 S+ A. n$ i  V6 `" I/ l" p8 y" G
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases6 Y" S6 e  y2 C) f* O
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low/ I: h( N) }$ I0 t$ M$ ?
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that+ E' Q+ f( w8 H1 \' R
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
# a  M, R, f0 z' h* P5 a( {prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
1 k1 o' w) j. lseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as) K) s; [. c' _
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

* a  y7 a" l) t9 N7 z
* J3 `2 g7 c2 ?: V. M' D( }    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter4 v% [0 ?2 H6 d5 S0 Q. C& I
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton* r1 K9 K& Y6 S
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,7 `. h# `: c: e; B: N1 D/ o8 j
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
, r$ {0 G2 }8 z+ ~6 h$ bincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
$ j. v" f% B6 C, l- y- N. kin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly. m( K- `) b5 h9 o* N& |5 b$ d) \$ Y
towards the end of 2006.
    ! d4 P- P# W& y9 B

: F, k" X$ H9 W, ^) a8 M/ H& _While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
! {. ^- }9 ?9 c9 c( C/ Q) [inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable+ p. b% u) D& O4 M
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
9 G1 N; k1 @3 @% agroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to" I$ c) e' P: Q# {4 ^7 C
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
# E5 N1 n& O, k( w. ?pressure on tight inventory levels.* N) U2 ^" C% Q; t

5 w# ^) g* K8 s4 t' f    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic" B5 W: [- w" u! L7 ~
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people9 x/ D1 k: I1 y8 f
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;/ l) w( j6 I- s0 T3 M8 x" U/ s2 e
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching3 A& U" b& b6 c2 ]- L
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.) p+ [+ @8 D" q

2 z* R) c8 H4 l8 m. ~8 B    <<; H) j4 }( N3 _/ C
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
6 j3 f+ p3 e+ {- e( `0 U1 Y( |" f
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; M( k! h4 F( J0 H
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey! c7 P* ~* W* G" |  c9 `" C
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  }9 X3 ^! n/ x) Y                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3. N3 n3 S$ ?+ i- O+ v! `
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
, A0 c6 j# f# h& H) g2 y. c8 F    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: ^  h, \/ T, ~% y) e) ^    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,0002 w2 t7 n: l5 R. H. W8 x! [! u
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 ?5 D4 M2 P0 Q" U
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
, X4 ?- |) j! C" s2 Q" ]. f    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; |& j3 O' E3 q6 `- z    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
8 ]+ |) v. ~* @! O: e  ]$ P    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& X8 L# U! w9 v
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -7 g  y3 {! S- @& [1 V4 P! L2 Q+ |
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) m3 c9 r$ [& q, y0 i; r( M) T
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
0 U8 d. a: v) U, z# M0 I3 o    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 v; }! F- i% b    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,5832 ~/ Q3 v) G; O
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ |! p8 X  Q/ E0 N    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,1859 [8 }( n7 g. f! S0 s  L
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 o' B. S1 J! j0 w4 S& ~/ ~
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
3 N5 C- l1 B1 n    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ {# t3 ~4 n$ }9 H, S4 V    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
' O" _2 y0 ?$ M# h0 X' u8 w    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% E4 q* E+ ^2 {  I) i    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
  s1 x' K, ^8 ]( O: v    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) d2 ^9 n0 e) _2 y' V
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500: N0 \' w+ `% h, m5 f
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 @% h0 X5 J  L& Z6 ]
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
. T, R; B- B, w/ R& i4 p! A3 f    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' o5 v' W* p) ~* U. R    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714( X% U: c0 K; K' Z2 I- \
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% h. ]# @5 _/ Z- F/ ^5 b+ [2 p3 g
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
7 Z. F0 e: d2 }: p& a4 x% b/ R    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( O. p) R% g. O6 F0 j* J    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
3 ]: k' S% j" [. j! f8 D  b    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ g" w$ Q9 S5 O* R) ]
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
$ d  y) ~  s: j    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; i1 m, x' C: ]3 v6 B
9 P* i/ T# p% h8 r    -------------------------------------------------------------: x  l; Z4 A' |) x& |" Q
                               Standard Condominium
# a1 R( m$ A! q4 ~4 j    -------------------------------------------------------------, Q$ [5 r  _7 x3 C" m, F+ o: k: \
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
" |( o; j$ x* T! q- |% M1 ?& I4 z    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
2 a; U" c6 ^4 J! i$ z/ G$ P3 N# Z    -------------------------------------------------------------& K) x- O' |7 j1 I
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
  A4 {  q  t" U0 L3 s$ D) ?5 ~    -------------------------------------------------------------) M: A! [6 m5 K8 z* j: @
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
3 v4 ?* y$ Y6 [# u+ X    -------------------------------------------------------------
* L: z- a3 ^. W( z) e  m2 H1 I% \    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
: l! c8 s8 Q2 u+ W' a    -------------------------------------------------------------1 W5 f1 F- C7 q6 s8 s1 ~+ K/ E; r
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
. x- d$ W) J  g% L! w% W+ @    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 }7 w' V* R  j2 Q$ t# u    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%) v+ L: P6 D1 p: I
    -------------------------------------------------------------8 d4 {/ W1 q  B9 I
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%5 K: _  q, L3 l$ A
    -------------------------------------------------------------3 P4 Z7 g" r& U( }
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
" H' r1 Y1 k8 j0 ]    -------------------------------------------------------------4 s2 y" ?4 P* `
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%& I9 A* r& W+ s7 q& T
    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 x& p0 H* z  r! M    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
: o# g3 T) k+ M: _3 e    -------------------------------------------------------------, b) `9 x, c9 E+ _  I
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%1 c5 K" r7 v9 [3 x2 e! ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 r8 h( Y) o& F( h+ v0 p7 C) W8 M    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
& z! G9 j; o$ P% t$ s    -------------------------------------------------------------7 L3 Q8 I1 s2 r  M5 Z! V% G9 Q
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
: F' l7 [2 n6 y- [8 B9 x+ S    -------------------------------------------------------------9 Z- w8 \/ Z/ o  x
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%, B% d8 P1 U9 m1 z+ H6 `8 O
    -------------------------------------------------------------- v/ ^3 L  |0 H7 ?' p/ i
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%, h4 g/ y! ~: u3 E5 s, A
    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 V7 l8 `( n! _, ~    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
/ ]; a: t: @" p- |! Z    -------------------------------------------------------------/ Y- M. w4 t5 V3 o, C( Q3 a
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%) l9 e; ]! o2 c- C+ I6 P9 N" b
    -------------------------------------------------------------
, s$ ^4 T8 h; G- Z: e+ j    >>6 O8 d; W/ e& N7 W4 @" L: q
/ a  O5 K1 y' \
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
7 s, y( W5 E& `' y4 ?, C4 Kin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint2 a% H0 q# K, K. b  C7 q3 c
John and Victoria.
5 k  v9 P/ s6 Y1 V5 k. B, u/ I$ r% H  ?7 j
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most" |6 f. X5 ]. _+ }1 `
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of$ S/ s6 f3 R+ e1 {& r
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
# {. i3 }. j/ ^9 K* Q& mreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price3 U: \4 s3 M) K2 z- U( _) ?
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities" z6 X$ t0 D' a4 q
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
; }8 S2 e% I; s$ K+ v% w8 ], gavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current7 f0 ~) U9 C: L- P4 m$ a! ~/ {# S
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable* Q" }; [# {" [; }. U5 j, ^
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on6 C# [  w% I% T" @
November 15, 2006.' g, y7 L0 f- w5 s) J5 Q
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
( Z9 w, U' g- }  C0 [fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
0 X. E9 Y, k9 i% Y* }$ H7 Wprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
. O5 O. ^; M, R2 ^( M, Yavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-10-6 16:44 , Processed in 0.077152 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表