 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
6 ?# e V/ z$ ?4 e- Y7 C; P7 t [0 q& J" x
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -4 W4 h) B! j# k! J" C+ O) e9 O
" P+ b& w" k) o5 A& R' K
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
: }( I! Z/ L [$ Bexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
5 M: u" \5 d! m. U- dquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic) g0 i, M8 ]7 J, d
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
* S: x& W- y4 `( B5 Eprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and$ \4 y* {+ |. _( [% `- }' {4 o; B
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,- F3 _6 V$ O! Y. J
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
% p) t1 |: E; n0 W8 `LePage Real Estate Services.6 r* U _9 _) [6 c7 s+ C P1 |0 q
# N e9 A9 q: e T w Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
8 D- f3 I j* U: Rare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
0 T1 M+ z3 Z5 v% Q8 X, \! V& Bconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and8 A" d1 C J# Y. J; `' h+ a" X# [$ ?5 a8 z
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the- n) k% q3 K& ?( I- S
residential real estate sector./ p3 y! ^; K; U [5 o& _, S
( Z; ?8 K% |9 p) y/ P2 o Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
+ `3 i3 X- L' X% Uoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)/ C0 y$ `& g& L& H
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562" R8 ]3 b* M' v' g+ T6 ^, _* v
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
7 t; G% e2 \7 d7 F, U/ @(+13.2%).
6 V8 @" I! W& U2 w' ` R' H) t( }; \5 a" t0 F* {( Y; Q8 W
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth9 a' t% o; c) L9 `
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the# q4 R4 e" _. l) d7 z' p0 s
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
: u% d. K) r; x5 Z( c7 Zpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
4 `1 J# p: N0 {# o2 j6 Lpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services., Q( a6 `9 X4 z9 H# X2 c3 G& s
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
- w& ]( X: l6 |$ T; Cwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy# s0 ], S6 j4 C
balanced market."4 w- p* t' d# B4 I4 ~* u
! W9 ~% O3 |. I4 E Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
! }5 m& K# x/ `! r9 econsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift% {7 j7 u6 b. C* g" H. _9 ?; c
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued0 j" H9 f- y* E1 c3 K- [
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core+ U2 N* m5 {4 X3 u: m) w: V
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
4 t; S/ _) Y5 f6 ^* Ymanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
" r: K+ [3 Y& B" B" L" Bbreaking price appreciations.
( ?( x% M3 q1 Z% D5 N3 b7 Q0 }0 j
+ t3 b) a/ I8 r' h, R/ n5 M Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding2 j& b4 F$ _! V4 F: V8 A4 f
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the% i! K+ X) Q2 ^" o( w- |( H
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.; A* y2 e# `4 _" X7 ^
& E4 [7 o- }: X: y" `7 t' X
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
% W5 a G x' G- U7 Y0 W; _7 K jeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
) u5 |/ o( k9 ^' Cconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off: q' K2 H! o* M% k4 z$ J+ }# X
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.& ]" t0 j) ] [% B
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers; |, u+ `4 c+ D) ^7 _# c0 A1 r' V
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of( G3 F. ], u Q8 j& t& c
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
d K( q N: e# \
1 m# n0 x: J' g- v2 u While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing8 R% }6 N8 M; _' q
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and+ l4 E Y3 {$ d( ^- F* k/ d% M5 n4 Q0 |
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada8 c9 X' P& N8 e% N+ H! }! J
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
, [$ @: A5 K# e7 Y$ a# y& z% R6 q; x! h0 C$ V: u0 K
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
9 c- g4 J1 c* Q9 V$ r6 g( nAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's0 ]9 J4 K4 S$ k- z( C
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
9 `4 m, y- u$ M; a. Orelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
$ B' M9 R7 a" A/ F2 gaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the7 P& V+ T5 |% d* c
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and8 i( z s7 o( b, R# t
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
4 y8 Y1 H5 g; o( H; s- qmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
7 i6 y6 p3 D+ O
8 a- }, T$ r D3 e0 p7 z <<
- d3 E% w0 ]2 A" Y1 l REGIONAL SUMMARIES
* O7 {0 n, L1 ^! S1 \9 g( H+ h >>
( K. l# @( f1 k: j# s$ F( B# w% {* V V" f$ j
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in1 M+ H% r% T2 N( h1 M
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
1 o/ I7 j, Y! j8 Y# Sof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time% Q7 X x* T% b+ ^
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
7 f) S! |9 n9 ~5 F8 N3 Mrenovations.4 T6 w0 M3 F1 C# ^1 K% J
% {+ P$ v5 C! Z: Q. E8 u9 U The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight% N2 u0 R$ R6 Z4 x9 L1 i4 i' {, ]
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
- J0 y. P) g8 V7 Z6 H- k: [compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and \5 `3 P( q, ]6 w% j
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
$ R, d4 L" z* D% D" C" I7 w8 U: Q1 j+ \9 e5 Y
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
+ m y) `# W/ Y3 [9 @* g4 i: Eslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
4 m$ ~8 u; M; B+ s) gquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
& ^6 e- c- E! p+ j) H% ~ D& @" s N600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
! T# X, C3 v; Kto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes' ~% M; W8 I/ u- D) }8 f
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
: z) q' O' ]3 d
q& I0 G% [6 X- m9 l In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
, b& n/ [$ {$ `( Gconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
9 A, x5 Y' R" F+ j7 c1 Qhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
" V X T, H7 y9 u. v; ^was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
- R& T8 ?1 A! G9 \8 X* odollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
1 ?0 [! s/ t: w2 Dbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
) o" d- H9 o, y! S% S/ E& v q: Q; l: z; Y( v; s
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
/ w o1 @3 ~; I% U# U, vamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes4 _0 @* D: p" _: Z
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
$ c f$ \6 F3 Z9 p- z4 G' xas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last. a( F U2 }- M9 e( _. w, T: m' W3 J
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.6 k! r ]3 z* k% d
( }3 c, ^6 e' O
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house1 Q$ L1 P4 V u/ b
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
, W' E# B8 {; k! alevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting) ^) D! F. Z. Y0 [
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
7 B! Y2 f$ F, m0 Rwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
& D- l, }6 ~& i( ipressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before4 N( X& o2 @2 w
making a purchase.; z9 H! H! @! d* p6 A+ |
. D2 E$ c) b% G2 }( k4 _8 R. j) h# q Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing! m2 n+ r0 {: W" n1 ]
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
, R$ l; J7 F0 y5 @/ H* c& o4 Econfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city7 ^5 h; |# b$ K0 z
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting" r: x2 d! `5 R0 {$ T7 m
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
' a3 N7 i* E# \& l- oamenities., A& j! h+ [! s3 l$ |/ M
# t; n+ Z+ C% B: O5 ]6 B
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels1 B4 U& p" c8 @1 S5 H( Z& t4 W+ @7 `
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand( q4 H% Y5 i5 q5 h
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has2 F; K% S7 U# v2 x& Y6 q- z+ k
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been6 V; d6 A2 A* k; }: k7 p. q$ h; B
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle1 Q3 R; O& g, ?& u+ f/ X; z
residence, rather than for investment.
9 Y" g# f4 r1 B4 B! x% L
I( x* c1 M# U, l/ ? The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
' o* S. X% Q9 O" Y3 mhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
" M' `/ {7 q5 F5 O p, F( |2 }in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
4 R$ u9 w# n/ L) C; m* F2 ^. Q' Dconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
3 v) i2 ^" K: \' s6 ]$ t9 ^rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
, Z6 j8 E+ N+ S# e* S' rthe market.
$ r/ W5 F! M7 x
/ H/ {& d5 y, F+ f' C In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
7 [, ~# z( M; l& Q% ?5 h vJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In7 Z/ D' `; x+ d: G
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
+ t }5 u% [* B# Y2 q/ qmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
/ t. o( \1 X' j) F i: jto the shortage of available inventory.
6 X9 m2 s1 r4 m( _. {1 j$ Z+ }% e# o4 l, s& I5 X
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its" V. y$ O; l: Q) v, {+ A7 Q, `# e
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
1 g& W5 X; Q7 L5 M. w# i; Ovibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses; }/ q! q! ]! t0 \
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.& T i& H7 B- q! `) n6 K& X* e
3 {& y8 f' N# ~% o" G2 m- j" c Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
/ i$ D# K, `5 x! Y" N' V6 ^& y* iin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
8 u1 z: w( V- `/ b/ \3 `unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
7 R5 h; Z2 L" Mpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
2 O: ~0 o' O( jprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer( V* c- T% _ A1 O: \; H
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as- p1 W3 Z/ u8 ?; }6 R
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity./ v, m/ o8 s( i4 }# @( H. ^2 U
! ?4 i. ]$ }4 y0 n
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter# V6 ?8 V* T8 }- T( H2 f
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
! n. q9 E4 n0 ? K% ^remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
- g& H6 ]9 u+ Y6 r! i/ Rmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices. p0 m( p, a2 {! b+ f, r
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
8 S9 j) K+ P7 s1 E [in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
) f1 K2 E6 Z8 ]towards the end of 2006.
, U2 |" M' P* G, ]9 k- h3 J
) ? b( e7 H8 `, w) qWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
i3 @9 ]- V9 }inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable3 t' X; ?4 R( Z; i# {3 V( D
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
+ ?. x' i; k! \/ t D* Y8 O. Hgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to c2 v! W2 k: K& E% w U9 t
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
: k8 _. X2 i. I9 Xpressure on tight inventory levels.
. K" |9 b) U- T5 }4 o( g- P6 I) S3 R# H! t) ~- D
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
5 Q1 k/ X# W' F6 ~fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people3 M3 R i. Q( J' d: ^- q$ d: ?. N
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
9 A4 y! x7 @0 h* |while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching' _( \5 @8 _! n9 C. y) H
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.: ~9 [; W# V. b7 S8 \" \6 M
8 i+ @; b x, ]& }
<<
: c" C6 o8 V/ Z* t2 K/ Z2 h Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006+ D8 [/ [" [9 r+ B( D
7 P) }6 g6 q( {$ A- Z- J -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* z+ e ]; E, g m/ x: ^ Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey$ _; \+ n8 D# \8 n$ d% `1 N8 \ w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ d3 n$ |% F5 D' Q1 t8 `5 j 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
9 ] e: u( U5 T! r8 E. { Market Average Average % Change Average Average
4 d* @/ M1 E0 ?& h -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 L* ^' W9 K; j$ r ] m. o
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0003 ]# m. j+ t: f" y& Z) |5 z; {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------% _2 G7 q8 M& N
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
1 b/ k c$ J2 v) q% @% Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( A7 v% A: ]1 {- O% [ Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000: @1 ]. M y! L' j
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 m M3 z0 i7 x* J2 f Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -3 l9 z, _7 Z9 ], `( S0 [/ [- N
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ T& I- k, y3 w( ^& W
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,3337 b1 M- U" m9 f6 ]& k/ c& }
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* J( |1 [& H& n/ d$ z! N Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
M" W+ h0 L/ X4 d0 q) x! l -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ N; h# d! \+ \* C3 u
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
3 Y3 s$ i, l, b' c& J1 G -------------------------------------------------------------------------) t) P- P. Q9 E- o$ q- Z7 a
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,2503 p5 H! A1 S& r) ~4 h+ P
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ t5 [- W/ {% o5 a+ P
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
) L$ m: c5 }( i1 V& u, ^* C -------------------------------------------------------------------------" d, J- g, f5 z" {7 O o9 w, p0 g
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
: Q; m5 C6 w9 Q( f) q$ s -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: g B1 Q2 J; u1 A1 r- V' v Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
7 G! F! V6 I" d8 v -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 r- w E- O$ O Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
+ S2 Z% W; C8 k: _) a; p( }- }) l -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ ?* l4 I# m, u
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714$ E1 h6 }7 f# ]8 a5 H
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ C5 [+ N, ]0 _" g Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500' W; B. B) Y/ o3 G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 X, d# u$ N1 |! ]$ X6 d Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0009 p1 w: u, a8 o* e7 W: W
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 I) q# w* {8 F4 T+ z National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860; ]* r) n, ]$ W0 n! \: b+ F
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 m4 V- E+ @: T* B W Y$ J) B
% P' I! f. Y8 h) a$ ] | -------------------------------------------------------------) l! }. G* A; C5 e! r
Standard Condominium5 k5 b M$ N& L: |& G0 a9 V$ f0 D
-------------------------------------------------------------
3 Q0 k, P2 G8 c* X) _9 ` 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
* Z3 b" l8 K2 Z/ t/ A Market % Change Average Average % Change
3 r0 a' q8 S8 Y; u3 ]( \2 ^ -------------------------------------------------------------
% A( ]2 S# c9 U5 O' N: K2 x# l Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
: L+ }, s3 r$ ^1 r' F+ C% C -------------------------------------------------------------5 t" x+ @2 s1 ]& _! P% x
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
5 v7 w" q) D2 g5 y0 V -------------------------------------------------------------' B" C, z1 d* l* H9 E0 m6 _
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
! H: C+ ^1 C5 M -------------------------------------------------------------8 O$ W S0 O* d8 f+ k8 ]6 R
Saint John N/A - - N/A& j2 f( z% n( x) f' K- Y; U$ \- M
-------------------------------------------------------------
& a. O" z1 K- I, q St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
4 |4 `' K1 u6 O; P -------------------------------------------------------------, B: \# r5 ]+ a2 [+ s* b$ g \" J
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%/ I- T& J% R i1 r& n
-------------------------------------------------------------/ H: m- R& k5 U- g% O- L4 C5 E
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
# U! m! r* u. z9 b# _5 M6 F -------------------------------------------------------------
& u$ A& ^6 O9 D; A Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
# r3 E# I* w+ I* a4 G5 j -------------------------------------------------------------) T6 E0 r1 S) Y; ]; E
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
. Z" X# K+ [, d8 o -------------------------------------------------------------
# h' W' m- V1 ` Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0% C1 `/ R4 y9 |( V2 x
-------------------------------------------------------------6 o- L7 a+ @( |4 Q
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
4 B. o) E- G+ H( I/ c* e -------------------------------------------------------------' Z; }; j& v; H, U% `, Q8 o
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%3 _5 R; a1 ^' [
-------------------------------------------------------------
4 F+ ~, T$ |9 V y' a3 K, R2 u Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
: A& T# Z# `& Q" G -------------------------------------------------------------; D8 k% H3 F. e6 F @
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
! S" f u; i; x9 D: F' \" V -------------------------------------------------------------: F( }. q# x5 j
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%2 p& G. v; m7 w/ @, Q# y
-------------------------------------------------------------
9 N0 l: H# e- P0 V9 q National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
. g) A0 O' ^. L# Q6 [& ? -------------------------------------------------------------% ] Q! U6 g% [. f h% P
>>, A1 A3 Z2 j! O9 D5 g1 o
2 b) M/ A7 \5 W6 l* | Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
; Q( y" H: `1 @/ @. H$ O& \% I3 [in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint$ q% I7 _$ i8 P0 R) J! ?' Y/ l/ K
John and Victoria.
; x9 p" _) q: F; `
3 t$ v, H: F: i7 |2 H The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
$ m: ?1 m9 a, B( d/ Ncomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of g! x! Q, r) z" d5 u9 H! A
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release7 W3 X# h; U3 _
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price0 B: r& z: o" |8 W4 y9 x2 }
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities/ B1 p$ d: x8 L. B
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
- I# h# _) y n, A/ zavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current2 L# S R/ c7 ^' h
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable$ U* p1 T9 g3 t" A$ d6 Y( o, L3 |+ |9 ^
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on+ w5 ~. A. O$ c, n
November 15, 2006.
" N* J' G) M" v) _ Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of3 B% F/ E2 E: \& X) A& U
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge5 U/ e5 f! k1 S* W
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is6 Q$ x7 D( y" B; h( W, O$ L
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|