 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable ( _% ~5 Y" E/ X S: C, V
4 ]9 ^6 T2 |1 b( u" X" c# N- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
( o N9 e( R/ ~
% N9 ~8 m+ H' S0 d4 g9 U. b+ x0 ? TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market6 f, C7 Y. m* F+ c$ ^9 y
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
' w0 Z# ]6 y5 j; Y$ F. T2 |quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic/ O/ K" i2 F* \0 J9 f
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit& {/ w" K6 ]' K/ t, M
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and5 M, D* b+ Q/ S) }: L9 M
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
3 ^% Z0 }8 {9 Q- s) b2 `) BQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
; }7 g+ \. d: j8 a: V4 VLePage Real Estate Services.
' x3 X' p9 ]- D) H8 x; K/ M: ?* h# R% e# y0 N. ~
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters( ^! l. U* w* H5 B
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
9 [; ]: W9 z1 p. Y" Q* k0 E# p" Kconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and7 I- b8 G5 M* m+ d% f
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
! [$ X8 S- B0 m8 j7 n! Y z% p qresidential real estate sector.
$ J$ l" f" P, `2 y h, k. ~7 y% K& _2 T* V, t9 G* z# O; c- r0 e
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation, n, Q+ C% [0 y$ g
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)9 F7 e" B! l6 P1 D. C7 O# l
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562( a1 S. y7 z% I+ O, N+ r
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3802 H) i' ~7 ?" B# E/ J- s( F/ f
(+13.2%). Q/ k7 P: R8 ]8 Z( Y" L
8 p- |* n6 L! i0 {0 o+ G* C2 I# f* L
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
; t1 V; j; c* e: \9 ?+ l5 Rduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the8 `5 K( O. H' m. V- g5 t2 R
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
9 R; u2 @6 j' U$ `, s+ jpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
+ W/ ~4 w1 B/ w# T1 l" w: Rpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
7 O" e0 _% _6 \) ^"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We: F% C9 u' Z' x7 q- Z
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
. y4 n" J/ i" S8 [1 b! P' F+ f) I# sbalanced market."6 G: s& c% a( n8 C! P& v6 Z4 E
, |& k# \5 u6 S/ y
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
& |4 W B7 I+ Z9 @# Vconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift' b+ o: k7 T! |& D$ A! `
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
6 m, g' [2 }$ ~; t+ F$ p1 Bthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
* t% i- O! e3 z+ lenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,& @1 _5 Z& S# S$ n. R
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
$ _, T& j' T' s9 J- j$ U( lbreaking price appreciations.
% Z& f% O3 e; \, I" ?9 \& z- a1 _* {% v) P8 C
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding: M% `7 Y- A. U, j z( H
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
9 i5 S# |$ Y; s' r+ P% _. Jlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.# j' ]3 v% L/ m; j9 j$ G
" _/ E% n1 ~" p& {
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid Y- h3 ~8 D: }" @" s3 ~
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
6 e+ _! T5 o. z! ]confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
" O8 \" b- z- n# L* Uslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
. C/ r) k7 X1 g7 rIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
" D2 v* z, x. y( Z) j: ggreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of! F5 X2 k' R: M, _2 w" C
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
}1 d7 ^9 ?: e5 a& j: C2 N0 |2 ?0 t# D, ~
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
$ g9 O+ K1 y( A" H! Lmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and' g' |+ a/ [9 [$ h. l0 L- J! i( H
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada& x" c/ t: N/ i& ]" w
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
& q. D6 B0 l( A$ S |' O( Y1 y) Q0 _; Q$ O: P+ S3 m* W! {
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
+ G/ M2 a! w. @! K" K9 I1 `& K. [American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's( d9 s+ s! k) A' D
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
/ [" z; A6 c6 E2 m7 |; ?/ urelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
2 {/ L; Q- d2 Eaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
) ?: u- T! S: o! K* cdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
4 R' d) E0 A7 N# Vaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
$ D B2 E6 B6 G b) qmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."! D- L5 O" A& V' m
; [) I' W3 O1 m1 g/ Q <<
I; H; u( w8 |8 ~* G, x REGIONAL SUMMARIES
; o6 k0 m2 M3 f3 d1 [ >>8 `, n+ j N! t0 ^; Y/ Q, F* F' X
/ ~# [. n8 ? c# w9 Q; j H9 a
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in" S0 J- i$ z. R! l% ^
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
) h, [! w J1 ~( gof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
& O, l& E) j9 H2 t q$ p! m$ }0 ?looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
}+ M8 ^) z( V' E! L; W' i* K7 t! jrenovations.
/ [7 v, Z" m' E- r
* u0 o, B6 V1 J" l8 N The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
% g+ @, h& |+ Wincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
3 i3 ~6 q0 E0 v Ucompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
# Y+ R$ Y& F& K+ h2 U% z4 mSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.# J; b; h8 w& `4 B4 |% q
) U# y# \1 Z7 u" j The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer) N' U3 A7 E& k4 ^. o& w; x) J1 Z
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the$ T. ^+ o6 v2 F
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
; k$ p% z& r& s! x" M600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores4 M0 A3 K: m. I. H# x
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
4 x/ [- u: H% |2 G) gand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.8 V- y4 ^2 A$ M4 D3 Z# g1 ?
% [4 H9 m* M) w
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced" f) ]2 u& q/ ~8 d- E' B
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their: q6 `3 Z! Y- N* O& X1 J) q
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers7 X" Y, J1 O7 {& H
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian+ B4 `! i8 U( A/ d
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing; ~5 |- ]& f) f( z/ n
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
; O* M* p+ A6 E& I" Z8 E- K! c6 ^! t& `) N, z( q2 Z4 m
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly! j/ Z" V& s. M! J* v( f7 u1 v
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
: i0 t2 h: z- E$ R2 q5 B* E$ Dpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,% x, l9 K! P2 J8 l
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
7 i. r8 O ^9 W9 _. W2 ~few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
$ p4 ] A8 z) v+ K) w; c& S/ v0 m1 Q" O) o/ A' I' d
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
2 t! T, P" f6 w4 b0 y# [, a$ pprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
0 D4 M/ U$ X* ilevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
+ b) x9 p! B) T+ [' ifirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
8 U8 w- g$ F3 ~' b% cwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the7 l4 W4 r K! C
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
$ T( i; m) e" c- I8 {making a purchase. d s* [" }3 J' Q3 `% C
) `) x! G5 O2 i( \% |/ t Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
! e& S: u) L8 S/ o+ w. ~& gmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong, D' O4 _4 k& G) V! ]/ X2 c
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
: g8 r; q% f1 A( p y, Ccentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
1 J6 L2 k0 l4 y* g4 G# Lattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown) ^6 U5 G2 a$ i
amenities.; I3 T- X# L G* w
8 m( b# K! k, P8 d
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
+ P# \ @, u& a2 X9 ~throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
* S$ J, r" T* C5 l. W4 T! o* Nacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has5 G w+ @% {8 W- R. K
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been2 q! i, t; L. Q6 }# F, j
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
# g. ]: F: X2 }! |residence, rather than for investment.
. D8 U1 t. F* k! }, Z7 i9 V: v4 |* Q( g; A1 `2 I
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as) \+ Z7 G8 Z+ ] W1 ^
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted+ e1 Q. }: e, t+ Y1 m" K
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
1 L0 U8 _2 N& [- K3 G) xconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
, ^* R b: m3 e. s" y$ c! N- Krate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
% i8 _: K7 p, D0 k: u0 ?$ Othe market.
# u, X7 H7 Z( A" E& `6 n7 s
+ N. ?: }1 y' u* k, W! j In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
( m) Z& y8 S7 h% P7 vJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
6 Z+ d$ Y# u: M: NAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring$ q/ t' I4 n3 ]( q: l& D+ ]6 d
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due8 P% f# c# a$ m( y& S( P
to the shortage of available inventory.
M8 k' ~& q+ A9 K; |8 w1 W! G g( g1 r( K4 I! W
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
4 j9 E1 S) _8 v6 Lmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains* Q( w7 x) _4 e0 {4 W& X2 K7 d
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
2 K. I u& g* K5 ?- dstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
# A. k4 c7 {% V& z' e l/ l' ?$ ]% M8 R- N2 ]# D; W7 e8 L6 a
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
5 i/ X! c3 v& min the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
# j) F6 e$ b h0 a8 G& {: c! Hunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that8 I7 V5 `& D% E) O7 H$ [% m S
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
9 ] j5 J1 F6 ]) d3 O+ _$ bprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer* f4 B7 f) S* L& D8 `0 H7 ~+ g
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
$ o+ s$ W. k J- m# t6 g( gbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.- M, V$ L# M- y' W: G8 M8 B1 }4 k
4 z' `" a1 P. s- f6 f/ \& ] Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter, |! S1 |; S4 K# U: F' s6 n
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
6 N$ r, h) g6 y/ z$ l7 M/ premained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
' e2 |+ ]+ a2 Y4 A7 T; L3 ]maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices, ], t: Q$ D: b* ?4 X. k
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve% m5 O H% Q! t& ?
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
' E9 e1 ~: j+ e* [: s: r. x3 Ptowards the end of 2006. 0 L% X9 Q9 J& n, U
. K5 i' D5 N! YWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
& N- z* v1 x: e. G' [0 b% Finventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable- A' e1 H, [3 U/ G: P3 t$ f& m. C
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse( M) c& \+ u4 T* {2 h s
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to& G& Z; }7 U0 o2 n; H$ R* ]
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added) p2 q$ n5 U/ \& C5 N Z
pressure on tight inventory levels.
2 L* g4 @/ T/ i- B* e
! o* O. E5 t" x+ t Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
# J& k6 D+ t$ { p7 B- W" bfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
0 y* e$ p, w5 K0 }! Tinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;7 I" c5 [4 D% }" @' [7 E
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
/ l& _& w+ ?, K. L! k8 a6 zfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
5 s1 T! X% x! I0 ^4 B
% v& {8 q/ g0 q9 a0 D <<! l+ z6 \/ ?/ r
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
* J: C4 \# v+ i, H
' c& U8 N- |- D8 ~2 Y4 ^: B -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ x. i. o B! I" ]* Z( e! d
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
$ n B, V) B( @1 B0 o -------------------------------------------------------------------------, S+ W9 w. k7 q4 K9 B- W! u) i1 M
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3! P$ B5 @$ e* }; t3 j
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
: R( I+ D7 q1 X/ W1 a r -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 a. H( t; \; H d$ j- Q1 _- D
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
7 d. r' S0 u, s6 o N7 i. k -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% m* m* q. S' u' g* S7 a6 _$ | Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,0009 t6 L% p( `, O ]3 [( ?2 l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 {0 _5 X6 a3 d D1 r9 u+ w7 a/ W Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
: V# Y8 B) e6 x- \/ K F9 | -------------------------------------------------------------------------! I7 i7 g" W8 \- r
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -4 L" ^9 g4 o$ G6 I% a) F
-------------------------------------------------------------------------% H$ ~! s, G% n
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
$ j3 E Y) d: z; o -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 _. g: k6 l6 p1 \
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
! @; |; q" {0 N) g. k& k9 Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ z7 |2 g, m7 f: n& J Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
% Q& ^0 ]2 j9 C2 y8 i- M% f+ R3 f -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: f1 ~5 n7 z( e) Z: y1 s Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
- s/ c1 D6 y5 z7 W8 ~0 E1 _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- n. `4 R3 D* W
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766$ U2 B( ~' m& p: k1 }' w! I0 p
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 @6 i. \+ x) U3 l! w/ V; P+ q0 M" S
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
7 {- d+ z7 L* _' B8 a' u7 p3 I8 V -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" {+ Z* J5 y2 K: R7 O Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
/ h% Q( k" ^) p -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) \& k6 w0 p* P) ]% X Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
0 |! Q8 c$ F: u2 e$ J& y) D -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 i+ v* J) Y$ |2 C
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714. P: u0 K" F0 ` w9 Z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* R/ P. N* C( g: U Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
& A4 M8 ]+ ?+ g) w& g6 z. n -------------------------------------------------------------------------* V5 m) C2 A' r0 c) ]) F' z4 Q- q
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
0 e2 U& _% ?2 @% j0 x+ u3 j -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 [0 k7 X4 O( \( z+ t* _" Z$ c
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,8603 r7 ?% f `5 E* i" L* o% t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------% l4 e4 w# ^. L- @
; M* A7 p9 ?1 p% l1 D -------------------------------------------------------------
" G, g. C" v, E; |' D0 z Standard Condominium5 I$ V' G+ c7 n* x1 y# \8 F+ r
-------------------------------------------------------------# u" }0 g7 h% p# e% _7 H' S
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo( k! F. t$ j1 L; |! r7 h6 O
Market % Change Average Average % Change
/ ?+ F: p7 @5 j) J! Z- ~ -------------------------------------------------------------
- _1 Y0 f9 h+ x$ O Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
, a8 B" T% N7 C- P7 | -------------------------------------------------------------
4 k3 G) l% M2 ~, h7 Q- w5 O4 n Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%8 h1 x; q7 [( I' k# p
-------------------------------------------------------------/ |" [2 {# |9 Q8 k5 _7 x( z* T
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A% \3 o0 b$ `9 [- H' O5 ~3 H2 C
-------------------------------------------------------------
8 j' [1 w( d. D0 ~& {( u Saint John N/A - - N/A" O4 A/ E4 I: \! L/ ^/ q/ q8 Y
-------------------------------------------------------------2 F2 w6 W9 a) o: r& I: Y+ u& U7 d
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%2 O/ u9 D/ V% a: r- s1 l$ F
-------------------------------------------------------------( N/ @& u9 k9 ]. G, c; y% [
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%, G7 ]1 e) h% A& T
-------------------------------------------------------------
6 ?0 |& ^3 I! }7 ]0 O/ W Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%6 k( f" b( U7 G0 |! ]) N5 N
-------------------------------------------------------------
$ c* t2 {& R( ^. ~% {1 \% }% V Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
+ a; A6 D+ r, {/ X: s -------------------------------------------------------------
/ I4 ?+ E: f" y: ~* q9 }& y Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%" l _0 Q) N3 i! B7 q9 p
-------------------------------------------------------------" x0 w, Q: b. U' B, y4 n
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
5 U* l% o* U7 L, f; g9 T0 H9 R: b8 ~ -------------------------------------------------------------
( y& ]" h+ `4 _, _5 ]# H Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
4 E( I1 G( ^) D% L -------------------------------------------------------------
1 D4 q: G9 X8 r! R4 h' Q* f" ?5 J Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
0 k/ ^' n$ a7 ?5 c -------------------------------------------------------------7 _" c8 _! o; ~. h% I. c* o
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%' v+ m0 L: u- e b
-------------------------------------------------------------2 Q. P, @; ]* Z8 T# L7 |6 b2 E9 a# v
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
# E9 C' Y& b/ I3 Q -------------------------------------------------------------' j# l# |7 B' G, b
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
M% z( V8 q! E- E* d -------------------------------------------------------------0 R4 y, f2 B- Y1 w
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
% _5 l' n/ {4 n0 C! ? -------------------------------------------------------------) m4 t$ {) |1 V0 q( D% A- x' k4 d
>>3 A5 m" x* n9 B# P: _9 T3 r
- e1 h% |6 i/ u
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined6 t- T/ \4 e2 [. f6 I, j0 q
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint0 r8 g+ k$ B5 @5 y
John and Victoria.
- z- _5 g3 x9 q5 {- j% x( I: r {* v$ N! o, }" m
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most6 v& r: V" T6 n7 C2 Q
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of' G0 @, K; |. t. u: Z
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
! G, p& F" B" \/ }9 preferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price3 H. \4 p" d" w" l. n
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
, i8 ~) ^4 f( y+ Q( Jacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is7 i" ?$ o, l; J1 l
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
9 q' N/ c) t& G3 e5 s! lfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
D0 _0 t" t% d1 m0 eversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on5 d p9 J* _- R) F* y) U3 Q
November 15, 2006.# f8 B, x* \" J
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of9 C# n, D3 p$ o5 F! {1 ~# b. l3 Z/ B" g
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
- ~/ n* R8 i8 a# p }6 ]provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
# L2 q# E; i: U7 ]$ yavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|