 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
) J, D; A, K% F$ F* C9 m" |* p5 a* O3 W
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -3 b8 l4 Q. c. `5 A8 c
7 r6 Q$ W6 ?( _9 Z" A, { TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market/ `. @. o5 N) y7 c" O
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
" B2 R F$ V2 x: |quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic* m! I% `1 ]: w0 e' { s) d
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
- a/ j* m S, n" Yprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and$ H1 `- P3 z9 i" _
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
* ~* ?7 S% T. lQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal, ~- |) z- l2 O( j/ f
LePage Real Estate Services./ ]) h! Q! R+ J% j6 C4 q
( J" m. W3 f) I7 f& d8 y Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
( F6 g: ?5 h$ o+ @8 \# Care forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic" u% W5 W$ |5 |5 J
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
, {! m0 H) R! m0 |& Xsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
1 p9 `9 n, y. w# W3 T5 Q, `residential real estate sector.8 L' ]% U% k* A/ q* b! q% G
3 R! r3 c& R" M1 R r O( P- @ Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation a! t+ h: l5 R3 T
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
- S. m5 D+ A* ?: c4 w6 V$ _0 }' x* iyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5625 K& L- m. C9 d. v6 l! c9 O
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
0 |! o1 w5 o0 @! ~& n(+13.2%).
2 F1 {! u0 X( \, @0 I
& f) [* }7 c2 p0 [5 m* h1 d "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
) G/ k) |: z! |7 N3 \) P1 o0 @during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
) f; q: S+ f; O% F0 J! sfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are* Q3 L, m, l6 E8 u
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
( A5 T7 _% G) }, hpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.8 S. Y* H5 [6 ?7 K
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
6 Z# j+ R( W, \welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy: F3 _) ]& H1 ^' @9 ?
balanced market."
0 c) w) n" R5 R" K* {, Y' y7 w' r# J/ c" d
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
; s, ^: ]% f) m% o# \. L5 d0 aconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift1 x, \& Q; a6 W7 B7 v- [4 I+ C
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued' @. \ v% P# m, l/ Q
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
) a: J+ `) v7 a& ]: k* r4 F0 Aenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,* p# l+ L; s/ Y8 }$ D' z* g
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
+ z6 J- U* ~9 t/ D. O0 [* r5 lbreaking price appreciations.
O( k! N8 G# ` M+ c7 _- ^9 Q+ \9 \8 {/ n, I$ { ^ c
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding7 x8 g- A8 `2 B3 R
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
) D3 o+ N. G3 [# k. k$ Nlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed./ L2 Z4 X2 R" v- l+ B: Z
O: ]+ x. N# K- S4 G6 U" a In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid+ t% j; v8 ~/ w5 Q* L, R& r* S" M
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
2 }9 _- ]9 C2 U7 G `9 U5 i1 qconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
6 i9 B( Z6 y- c2 m! {* Qslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.5 O% t: `' z7 h2 c
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
3 m& w) E' i$ u/ ^greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of7 i) \0 B; C; L- d& F* W5 m
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
: d. Z w. P0 \& R0 [* a1 K3 K) @2 m: y B. l
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
' `# P3 `/ E, b* e4 lmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
0 u' H V" W/ h; f0 Ufinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
* l: d" {0 D |/ S: S4 k7 ~" nare markedly different than those found in the United States.
; @( _& r& U/ n7 v# S' F: p8 @* m
! |" S) b+ s5 n% I Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the0 {* K& ]' Y( {+ ?$ j( o1 g
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
8 o2 J8 L1 Y: q" Ufavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
) j8 U8 N( s6 q/ o9 H7 F" n5 drelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
' i. Z4 l* r/ u: v1 [2 X4 yaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
1 G6 X2 U- {+ `" {- P5 m- Gdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
8 o: p$ Q) t' Q( Maggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
1 k* g0 b8 X- V) L! hmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
5 J6 P$ X7 B" T) B" N5 o
' {8 D3 F% e% {/ J <<
; `/ w' A2 D) a" v REGIONAL SUMMARIES
& k& X( k1 X5 ^$ ^! j& `& u+ M- E >>1 [8 o% N7 A+ D6 y
# G$ R# N6 P& k) u Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in! ?9 _& [( x+ X2 }/ c4 g# }9 {4 G# S
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
3 g' O& h8 l4 Yof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time/ U. f: c7 |* _! O1 m
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of/ @9 z' \6 ? E
renovations.. D2 b* N8 K7 Z6 e- G7 g( Y
@, ]' l$ X n: P( J; y4 q
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight) w0 ]1 Q! o- \: n( l5 C3 j2 e I
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation0 y1 n: I" x) n( s
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
5 y6 r% y3 u( T V4 ISeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.4 X' `- q1 Q. \0 e2 M
) @% c6 G' j% f7 S% t
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer0 j/ _9 ^# L, Y2 L2 E1 I& g
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the! t: X, G: Y: q7 H7 z- o7 @
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new7 R5 N7 [* s/ B! ?; |
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores. W* z. i) J9 I9 ^3 B D& I2 e
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes! ?- f) @! |3 r4 k
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.3 b+ E# k% O* n% s9 G. y
6 ^7 x9 \( q5 A4 _ In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced7 {* u$ I I4 x: d
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
8 V& C/ m6 T5 k; Jhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers( U# U& J6 {# P$ L% Z
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
" v0 W3 m9 W3 N' A/ {; c2 K- Pdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
9 H. C# @" L2 p% D! d$ n2 jbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
7 V# G( s, D* @' U- b+ g: n( k+ x$ u, y5 |
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly% B' k2 }0 Y. o# H1 w
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes3 S# d0 H0 T5 @* x2 t5 n
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,# A& b9 f. T* |, l4 v* J0 x- H
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
, A% w7 B3 l! s: i8 S Q% Lfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
( o4 h% I1 S; E5 ]/ _$ R) H0 d4 o" T$ Q' S$ j
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house2 N9 b ^+ Z) Q c9 f/ f/ p2 o
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory' ]1 R3 e7 O6 |
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
! {/ f+ d [1 j6 I7 tfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
7 ~8 _) a! I3 B$ j/ c/ t8 \5 p% P9 Jwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the5 F+ m1 E" J+ i0 u/ ]( @
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before3 v. v& ?6 t: ^
making a purchase.. t" k2 W* V% J w
6 R: v! i2 |% g Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing d8 W/ O0 k. D3 H4 B
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
- q3 O( V! {: [2 h9 d: `confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
! T. |2 H3 f4 l2 Q$ [( icentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting% c5 h7 \4 H& ]- _( P. y. z
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
/ d! `: H4 G; J0 m+ A+ f" |amenities.: z9 R) [# a% V" ]7 y! i
& v' H" X5 g1 ]/ e6 O4 c
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels5 c* v g$ ?8 ` J
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
6 `* W" u, B4 h% h9 i3 H1 q+ `! @- oacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has! ^+ s3 s/ p- j4 |( \- {) B$ w
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been; Z3 e2 A' l e6 g0 d/ K
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
5 e: c" D5 p7 ?: Wresidence, rather than for investment.
$ _( H& H; U4 G. q- y7 @1 Z% Y7 {& A& j0 Q' o! ?
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as" p: F+ y* g; n5 Y; z& Z5 h5 o
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted6 ~5 X8 `# u( y
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
. p. D) w3 r& f) V, C7 \9 @confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
' u" C1 ]3 H: k G/ @/ @rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
: }! d0 I% {! @' Zthe market.
. T( J- \, v$ b' O$ g& F5 b! D- r5 U+ e. j- p
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through4 d% F+ l2 H# R: z) M, L
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In4 n5 h1 M, h% g
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
% k0 H& H1 |' D* V% `0 ~& L$ j9 ~months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
5 y& ?$ z; P5 y6 Z/ ?to the shortage of available inventory.: \$ e: E8 S$ A/ u, [) ?
# s+ s' a3 j! l% A6 P6 V7 ^ Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its, H" p* ~7 x6 Y$ @) T/ `8 h4 Y
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
. g6 r9 x% e m. Q( u2 }6 @) x# Qvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses+ U/ P, A2 M h9 }+ R/ u! { w
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.+ k% V$ {1 D; y+ ?- t1 u8 c
5 q; A9 i1 q$ z9 s' \! f
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
# M! q2 J& Y; v- `& c# Q5 [in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
: p: ?6 q1 m Q9 F9 |" d2 E1 b" ?8 }7 vunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that0 n) K2 g, P# R! Z; H8 ?/ {8 e
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring6 m1 S) z2 q" ^0 P1 H7 K3 V
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
3 Y$ W$ w" O2 P1 I( M/ useason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as+ V, X; J4 Y8 M# ^) V
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
, L. X: f' w+ ?; B% Y1 k% ~& {& J7 q! f |
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
) ?: j) E$ m* j1 y. f& l9 v9 pas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
I4 S/ o4 F8 T' H' g( o7 |# yremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,+ h. D9 u' d, Q+ u: @- f" B, U
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices, v" }0 V& Z4 F5 ]. m r7 J/ M. {; l1 R: P
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve% R) k. x- {/ T; t" }3 _
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly) g7 o6 e3 x8 g* J
towards the end of 2006. , K3 {/ }6 j* D" O4 E* _/ B
% w3 j+ n/ F( t" z# W" F2 GWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
; q P' C4 T4 V" ginventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
( c0 D4 f; K; Gto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
( i( X0 f' P; Q1 n" ?group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
3 p9 R: X1 B+ ?. Nforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
6 Q6 j# @1 F9 H d! M8 [& i- i& apressure on tight inventory levels.
1 f1 J* h" z: ^6 m6 J. Y8 ]0 w) K7 J$ I
/ w0 x6 b2 a; m, O/ ~7 U5 t( ~3 n Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
, q$ _1 r8 X6 q& hfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
) a6 b& h# W6 ?# n8 Z# Kinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
( L5 U y2 g4 u1 O- bwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
' T) [1 S0 Y8 W/ Ufor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
- t& R! S3 u3 r" I0 |/ ~
9 [* S5 o7 V* J <<. K" y0 M7 l* C# z3 B2 ?' N
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20068 \( l% R( } r2 z6 `# ]+ ^' ?
; m; g6 }# {8 j9 b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
" Z* J! F6 [8 F G& j Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey- x. z) F v& F$ J: `" ~4 A! f
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 c, H+ l1 l0 ?8 \
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q31 |* S% m, A; w& M+ L" f& q6 A
Market Average Average % Change Average Average+ _9 Z4 p. {$ L
------------------------------------------------------------------------- D: V$ _* x% V2 B4 q
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
: p0 Q: b4 S$ L -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, o) D2 G" o" |& M/ Y Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,0003 @# }4 d( D1 W* i& s+ P! R( x! r
-------------------------------------------------------------------------3 a" `5 l( A. Y6 N" T+ H* a
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
- u: x, f+ n% c Q3 ^5 e0 r3 @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------! n& U0 f* m. g: b$ {2 I7 C/ W
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
8 m# Q2 ~/ D+ |7 T6 \& @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 I+ g( }& s& N! g# B St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
7 Y/ K! R6 }2 u1 z4 p" W -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 B. {$ ]& O5 z: _+ _+ Y: r Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583 \9 |; `& K, L8 q" J
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q3 F: w2 S: u' m* k7 F Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185) h0 S) ~5 i* P" P6 D4 F, j+ ~
-------------------------------------------------------------------------5 ~; g8 a' V3 y0 Z" y. T3 J+ Y8 c
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
9 [( t5 p0 g" a2 c5 D -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ R% j! K/ g' C' | Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
& ` L! n( b, h4 ~3 B -------------------------------------------------------------------------; p+ W# Q, j7 ?! b3 n, ?8 [7 L( Z
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707) S" I! G5 X' v1 z. g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------" b- d$ }# t/ ~0 b5 H0 r* z/ }
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
" T3 \% A& S* r1 `1 [7 z5 R -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. D/ v! |4 _* W5 B Z/ S Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
- X" V$ p% y* @) ~ -------------------------------------------------------------------------: F' j" m3 I' g% c
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
/ O# P6 E$ R" C' C: \# ~0 ?/ n H -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; Q9 z/ i, u5 I% T$ X* P Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
4 n2 H1 R2 N! S0 w! \! M; U0 y -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ f; N/ P7 I' p& S; u' A, B) v/ P Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0005 e q& O" _7 I. Q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 w4 C( M& m# I National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
; j2 B2 Y$ J) g9 ?! ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 _: y+ h5 v E4 k
* s5 S1 o" o% F7 E
-------------------------------------------------------------; d: m* G4 y( c! G6 A
Standard Condominium
+ H0 ~+ v% S- Q u -------------------------------------------------------------
9 A8 ^1 d1 U; I1 |' d3 ? 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
# j0 r9 ~: T. C9 @4 y& R! y4 v) W Market % Change Average Average % Change
; r# O) ~7 ?. L0 g( S+ T -------------------------------------------------------------
" Z. w% w/ i+ v Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%% m6 G* P% Y; G$ r1 [9 z
-------------------------------------------------------------
) [/ O; ]9 E6 e; l2 ^1 _ Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
2 M0 g& a/ h: {$ o7 x+ K -------------------------------------------------------------& r* |% O6 z9 Q B" k
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
& U3 N1 e, M" ~4 l( ^* }7 T2 t -------------------------------------------------------------
, @$ [' l5 f# u# O/ Z( R Saint John N/A - - N/A
# _' P G% z- ~# o% I -------------------------------------------------------------4 ]9 g9 m& j* b& p
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%$ o& L& c: J+ f6 v3 K0 ~8 u- J
-------------------------------------------------------------: `- H' a, a' K" o K3 [( k
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
, F G5 j' a0 b p y+ L2 ` -------------------------------------------------------------8 g! j7 {" `) T
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%6 e) [# h4 M+ ]. v+ w F
-------------------------------------------------------------3 g8 @8 a: Y$ O" y# M
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
9 G+ c( \1 l1 { -------------------------------------------------------------: } i; T; w1 z
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%; h& V/ s5 N6 @9 b
-------------------------------------------------------------5 C9 k% B# Z9 a% Z% _8 H5 B# o
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
h& G. |2 G) K+ N -------------------------------------------------------------
9 k; d& S1 F, \! c4 o( u$ Y Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%- @6 Z* |% ]& B# R
-------------------------------------------------------------
) C, E+ g1 Z! b5 x' A/ D Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%/ B6 T, W$ H- R+ k! k
-------------------------------------------------------------( f- o$ Y/ ?0 v5 g8 b
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%! \, d' p8 x8 o! y1 o: @! X( f
-------------------------------------------------------------( J" L O2 d3 ~7 D
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%1 j- d' Z8 Z& W1 E$ b0 e
-------------------------------------------------------------" g. X( b& @) Z. \5 ~9 v
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%% ~4 ~6 B7 I& X. a) O* H" E. e
-------------------------------------------------------------
$ Q0 e6 e0 Y; X% S National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
& \) D% l4 u3 `5 ] -------------------------------------------------------------
; V6 o W) F$ l5 `$ x8 Z4 R9 q >>0 _/ s0 H3 x# _- _, [
* ?' o7 B: }' s
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined n3 w- t9 ]+ W$ D. N
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint9 L$ t7 J; S# \* E
John and Victoria.
8 o! L9 R c; e) S) f; _
( Q0 ^( f' C! L% a. k# p* |3 X The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most+ P$ _8 t4 a6 q$ V$ k7 x& j
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
- z' |* B: ?8 e- R! C& R# ghousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
1 l8 n# u6 ?2 | Q. hreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
: a) ?" q' J& d" d' Q- q) ftrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
! W; Y6 @5 q% _, x/ h6 X( `across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is; s7 e' n; [! M& G
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
: j; t; a5 |4 }figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable2 W+ V$ z' B5 t
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
& d4 I" u, ^. h" HNovember 15, 2006." m6 h9 e4 P6 g+ t
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
5 ]- r8 g( }7 s( a' i% U" sfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
5 S% ]3 X& B" \' e7 {4 ], S6 sprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
* P, |! M( w) ^* f9 ]$ R' p8 S- A/ Yavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|