埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2286|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
7 Z4 @" N- s9 N6 C6 e/ s0 h: H- F# r$ ^$ `8 M0 M: ^' G0 E
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
# w& ]! L+ B' t0 m1 @, l- T+ O8 j" K3 V6 N# a9 F
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market; Q8 i; L9 E' z4 W6 n* d
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
/ y. e  q; e+ _1 h5 |2 bquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic1 }) d$ p* o! Z% i  f6 Z6 [9 s7 T# s
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit. Y4 N2 t0 v  E
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
* c+ |3 J4 i5 }- `. h) ]more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
0 a- J. E+ ~( d  ~4 ?Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal2 C' F" N4 w$ O# b, }$ O2 d
LePage Real Estate Services.+ f7 S- S" J. U# C, e

# `# k" x! T( q    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
, c6 U5 l$ \7 c3 p) m% Zare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
6 k9 n8 o( V2 `& r$ a) C6 M; t* uconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and+ r6 C1 P: w1 |, F
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
; W2 G. a/ Y! V7 k! gresidential real estate sector.
7 Z( k8 r5 f: K6 W! |- T5 L5 a# L6 M- F* b
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation  X8 a' F5 p# n. C: O2 j% F: J# |# P
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
, w4 l0 X! M8 {) }( @7 U; ryear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562/ X5 l4 j$ w+ d1 c9 z# T2 I
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380( V  `/ p, F! m7 u& s; A: }2 X+ p/ ~
(+13.2%)./ @+ x' a5 D/ e" P
6 r; M: O! K1 B
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth6 T$ @/ r! U: d7 \- z* j6 U
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
3 T1 F2 K. S- V2 r2 G' E4 R" ]frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
8 N6 m5 W) v, t, {  M# R, npoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,, C8 j1 Z9 p& c& o5 x" {
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services., F: Q% i( v$ \# }
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We* C2 D' t$ L( Z6 \% j8 R( H+ k* S
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
, ~6 ^9 ?: ?3 z! d* r: H) }balanced market."
2 k7 a* H1 n7 A  q4 u- d4 Z
3 N; I% X# y0 K( P. T    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,( Q" d" i6 {1 n  ?
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift, {- P1 t+ m8 e3 F
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued  D: M7 B) A9 c% D3 z
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
7 l9 s4 j: M* {energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,+ |2 |0 p2 w/ h' d1 K  F
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
- R; S2 x* E; c3 D2 vbreaking price appreciations.! W. J# j5 ^% @

* z" b/ O0 d# A. t$ B& T4 v( }    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
& X8 p) o# q/ X$ o# U7 Ueconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
! ]- Q* L/ ^7 ulargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.2 A: k4 [6 e* y( I0 @
; c% K$ O( r% v  y
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid# h2 a: J! s, g# Y- D5 _
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer. R+ e6 h) e: d( b7 x( |3 `, @
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
" _8 K: z& H3 @2 C0 eslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
% [+ h. e- G: N, |# J5 @( }In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers* [/ ?0 b) m( i+ [
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
$ z. U* b+ P% l  k+ [- z9 a# nprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
" |, B$ n9 f. p* {% a, F
5 Z; U: _( ]- _& j2 a    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing( q* B3 q; y) I! ?* O
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and' N8 {0 w: e" C
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
5 u. c: x* M  o# A( n6 @are markedly different than those found in the United States.$ G* k& y9 F' p" b$ C# ~) {' x
. B$ y" C& N& e+ m
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the/ ]) m' C: e6 B/ g8 ?$ l6 k
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
# s. u3 m0 a9 @3 w! h0 e  \9 b: zfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
7 ^7 q9 m) Y7 J) _8 Hrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general8 ]: d/ F: E$ t* j( [0 K( n# N
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
1 I2 d/ k2 k/ `) V0 o/ kdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
1 `5 n8 p* R$ @1 Q. Laggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization2 N$ H5 i; W5 g! J7 x( X
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
- o7 u( s' u$ a" M8 i% F, B$ k( x& u
    <<
. X8 J' r. ~, x                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES- ?- a8 h5 R; d+ T6 T  J
    >>
9 S( [; l0 d* o% G1 n; Y9 j1 A
$ F' v, l$ f, |! `    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in' x. z% h( c# e7 J8 ]8 h7 C
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
  W% o. B# T8 P9 r! Y) ~- j& kof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
1 V, T4 |! B. ~) O. h/ l  u0 B" Y9 Q, `looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of& ]- o% b5 M' J. N
renovations.7 z% O% _+ d0 v( w
1 H4 ~7 A0 O# Y! h0 K( X2 B
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight8 v6 W* P3 D5 S1 I4 Z
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
6 e% d( q, A9 W1 q& jcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and" E- h4 s( C7 v7 N% Z
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.% U! a$ E' ?5 o: C5 s- W- b5 p
+ H( T* X4 J' X
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer  w* L# G3 S# G
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
: |9 y, y5 N# f+ n- f' Uquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
( V# c9 n! ?6 _; i2 W4 L: y' |600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
9 p. n: l, ?4 Y5 P; hto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
4 C6 u9 z$ j. }% U8 k! o1 O6 T8 v* T5 Land are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
2 [9 i2 s- P8 }" d
5 W$ N/ p; v+ r9 c% X& S. w    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
' ~1 Q4 l1 m1 {* N5 F: lconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their- G! b  z8 q6 _. w
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
( |4 D2 T% F/ Bwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian% {% M; B8 @6 U! c8 x( N6 _+ K4 v
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
5 F" S. ?( B& S0 `buyers with more options when looking for a home.
- ?) Y- |- l) z+ Z7 d3 o  S! T: p4 y
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly4 \  y+ s9 V: y+ S3 P
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
3 M+ G% D4 {, Cpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,2 x5 K" Y/ A3 Z: K7 e) }" @
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last" {( X$ O( q* w  [) B* A
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.4 \% Y0 V3 C( t; y# t9 p# @
3 C* J$ s, h2 h, I5 `# W8 v
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
9 P: ^* \5 K6 C% E) H5 uprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory( m- J$ e$ n) }8 r7 h
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting2 h- X: N6 S/ {6 A, X
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
; K) G% n( R: d5 Y6 Z+ vwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
3 W7 A! b- x+ I% a4 ?8 G0 ^pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
# V0 C7 e( M2 ~+ ?* j" J" k5 c7 Hmaking a purchase.0 \$ X# ~" t; p$ E
; m1 I* A) S4 k
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
/ x# m" L6 w8 q# O  i7 v  Amarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
9 o  t* I. \! m. Q3 Oconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
2 x& H& Q) Q( [centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
% W% D& n# d1 K' J# k4 U% k- l( wattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown3 v7 D- K: ^6 Q5 a. O, f9 |2 p; M0 R
amenities.
: r6 i( n& q+ H! a* e% I& M0 q( U# T4 ]! J( D/ X
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
  n: ]1 R  Q8 p0 C2 |$ xthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
6 ?4 K1 ?4 s, R6 P' wacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has% S  y9 Y" W9 ~1 k1 W
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
& I$ }2 n, f& ~* ?, o- q0 qdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
* i$ Y7 [" t6 Uresidence, rather than for investment.: I0 h+ ?; _9 {4 R4 h
+ I8 X* ~- G' h3 K2 z7 K$ W
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as; T4 b- S; C: G& \8 C
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
3 J( S& k" M$ A  a  J6 n" y5 Tin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer9 {3 S+ w' Q' v6 e
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
/ |5 k5 _8 O4 |! f9 j; S1 arate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
8 o, {( I# ?7 w; q+ ]8 b2 n  Bthe market.' l9 M; w5 o' g7 B$ [
$ m4 Z2 b) K0 R6 Z+ Q7 e7 w: e
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
1 x7 p* e: V" I3 |1 @. p# ?July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In6 R7 i7 h" `+ T; j) s& O
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
' R$ g( m. I, A7 Qmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
" B; y6 f) O! q% Lto the shortage of available inventory.$ O) |) j/ H3 Z9 H) M

! [# v- j+ t/ w4 O. w0 P" C! b    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its3 L7 T3 \* ^4 m+ T6 Y
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
9 ~0 X- [) L6 |5 w# d4 B5 u* ?vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
" M! d' `  q) b: hstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
. H& u8 s  A0 L% b3 V
- C* E$ I; i" D7 M3 I& X* e  P    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
$ d' {8 z3 E4 L# M3 a6 \in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low9 }$ ^" ^) }% A  j, R# s
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
" L- R* k/ c( i. x! [0 Opressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
- k/ m. P4 R+ h/ l/ A1 G5 V1 A: g/ H, e- \prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer, _" Y5 ^, Z3 f: C
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
! w4 _% y1 }3 Zbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

" X9 p6 ]1 o& |. [9 D$ x7 D: C' i$ Q6 T" f4 r' W1 V
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter3 P: [+ Q- F; O/ p( j4 g% d
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton+ [; g$ x- ]* B0 k
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
! p$ \1 H+ W4 Q$ _5 ~  Smaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
6 O1 H; O8 I% K$ Y0 I7 ?# P3 o* }increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve) c1 R6 b! D1 \. i, O1 q
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
! J: e: O" \( t! l9 G/ y  ttowards the end of 2006.
   
1 v2 m: L3 E: b! F8 B6 y
2 C0 V2 s/ D9 iWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of3 P: `. g+ }( p4 f
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
: r: f; ]1 J, W' [6 |to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse; U* X+ k& t  {% E  o" A
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
- J! q5 F$ d( Q/ oforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
" a; o& h, ~+ c7 mpressure on tight inventory levels.- _4 E- a2 Q4 k7 }) a* X  W
3 a* q2 w. Y! p. s1 e, Y
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic8 k% h1 [; O4 w4 j2 W; m
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
/ n5 T6 |' P4 G1 v2 F, binto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;& ?. K/ i4 o/ K" n! J8 j+ k
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching3 F4 a9 a. Z* E" z7 P) q1 u5 l* S
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.& j1 [; ~! s; R! P* O. j) A
; D% H' S5 z- f& w" @! q' b/ c
    <<& e; U! p& V# }: [
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006/ y& ]( ^# k! t9 J  _: W
) n3 g; U; T4 y5 u
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ ~0 P/ k$ J! l1 R4 d- k
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey1 q' H2 B" T' z. ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 H- r& q: x+ A/ h2 S, [0 H: X                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3$ a, Q9 |: b$ G) x, z( Q; T
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
  A7 n, F$ v" ^* b) F% j    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" ]: c) G8 \' O1 L" ~    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,0008 M/ F# w0 L1 E) T0 E/ E. m' G& r
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ f, V' H. W3 D* t* r1 p    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000/ F$ J' g) J; k" y& ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" P" T, J6 ~' x2 F. {    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000) o" q  V! ^- ~3 g, h$ l# }
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! [  \( l' x! a" o4 b. f1 v; b' B! d$ e
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
% }" Q  f1 Z# M. x6 D1 p: C+ Q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; [" S' @9 ^( N    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
5 P0 Z- T2 k" n    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 m; `( o4 R6 j2 P
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,5831 p  j3 d6 T* w4 ]2 J2 ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: r! `( b9 ]7 }+ k6 q
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,1856 @$ x; W2 e/ c- d% r" b
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ]8 L2 ~6 r* ~. y% P    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,2507 D" u' n$ ]7 O% l- }& v! @" _
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  ~8 r% K* O& X. S* s; n! r3 Z. |
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766% O9 R  v+ e2 b8 d* |- M
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 O6 t5 D& `" m& W, w6 f$ _    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
: F! V3 L# ~3 O" m+ s1 ]# E    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( o1 `' X% P7 a1 }    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
( t% B$ Y  G  {0 k6 L; @    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. V, `, M  N) E- _    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
7 d. ~2 D2 Q8 j! _& |6 L# n0 d    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 `3 Z6 I6 z8 S  C* ?# _    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
& b& _& N7 N5 Q7 B" ^+ j% Y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; U3 O! h/ u% c0 N
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
) s3 W& ~" A% s8 z" A+ y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: y6 ~' W* [+ y% Z
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000' K' m* E% z  W: M; L( z) }
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 N3 Z& D( T8 A+ r2 A2 m/ k4 S    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,8606 f+ o+ R$ h1 y# F& U( f5 @6 }' @
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, |# f8 O: j' t& C- c& |4 @" R4 i& |/ r
    -------------------------------------------------------------
; {; P2 s: N5 W3 U; U                               Standard Condominium
5 t, z. c7 M' S% G9 G8 d/ h- U# J    -------------------------------------------------------------% ]& c# K( H8 [- q# V) v
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo' X9 y# I2 }/ h" A' }* p
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change) W( [0 Z' U# g, Y2 j
    -------------------------------------------------------------9 q9 a# o1 s, [# s1 f& m. x; K
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
  ?# U/ Q) M3 s9 R& k1 v    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 n/ z# b- S' ], p# T8 m  A# J    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%' q9 [$ ?4 W3 g/ j; k- ?$ L
    -------------------------------------------------------------
( I" E& s# b+ @( A; J& k    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A+ m* M  r4 W1 w3 Y8 ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------# O6 C& D, n# U5 E
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
; ^  t. _& A) `' o2 I/ T    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ c2 e2 u1 U) n; ?    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%5 a, p: a7 @, ?  w) \
    -------------------------------------------------------------- _# n$ _9 M2 r+ C
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%2 Q  ^5 f( P" y& D  W, X
    -------------------------------------------------------------" Z3 m' D" g: q1 T; b
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
9 r4 ?% ], K5 {! Z& A) t) V    -------------------------------------------------------------* a( D; H1 q% {6 ^! F3 M
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
9 K; B9 P6 ]9 J% u    -------------------------------------------------------------& E1 `' H+ W1 r# A0 b
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%  S$ E6 r1 p+ P& M/ r: l
    -------------------------------------------------------------/ C; P. C% b( G% j7 _* l& ?
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%( z. R. i% Z+ o* ?7 ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------
' O0 L9 S. y& Q4 v    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
+ a# }1 |% X0 |) X    -------------------------------------------------------------
# r3 h- h1 Y7 f; Q) v2 Z3 A    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%; m% {4 V7 X3 D
    -------------------------------------------------------------: e. X$ X0 s% j1 `3 z1 _
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
0 W& T$ S: A. m% T! ^$ T9 a9 D    -------------------------------------------------------------4 N) J0 |  A! l- h$ _9 ?
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%( S7 y/ N. z( Q8 U7 ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 r; c; v" C5 w4 x" `    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%, M. U6 }# A2 I  M- N
    -------------------------------------------------------------; A2 S2 W# ?: `! D& D! L& h
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%4 ~+ t) e( u* l2 L# \
    -------------------------------------------------------------
, o, c0 k+ ]3 M    >>. n- @: K% p- C9 k5 \
6 Q: {. |8 S1 _' T, v: F
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
' G/ n$ {' k/ W4 ?" i, E5 V# {in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint# h$ U8 F& k5 r3 A0 b, |
John and Victoria.5 O: v, H7 g9 h! _9 p- i

" q# Z1 g/ N) |0 |5 n* G/ c    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most( V# Z% @  q9 p6 m5 J* ^6 W
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
& H% v( D0 u0 M: s+ Zhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
# D9 H5 O1 C- Z% |, vreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
9 j& S- h2 f2 s+ u; u" x+ `trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
1 h7 E, x+ ]' Y( ?, a2 gacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
, D) {) ]- T7 L6 z. [3 O! {available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current  ?. G' u& D5 ], X4 q
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable1 T" D1 x+ Z4 v! v0 ]6 m: s0 F
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on4 A4 v1 r5 J7 [* c& Z4 d
November 15, 2006.
9 m0 K1 g  p( }5 j5 E( Y) [    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
  Q. u: Z% [" B! H+ N3 ~fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge7 b6 T8 R2 f. f# b) s
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is+ C4 o1 b; U5 b! @$ [2 W, d* @
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-3-27 06:13 , Processed in 0.125111 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表