埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1892|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable - P* `" L+ y4 V5 J
) y+ C/ Y' I6 R& {" w
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
3 a+ A1 K/ S( H" s2 ~1 v
8 @% ]2 S. g% r8 |8 E: v    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market9 B' G9 {/ i$ O' o
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third) w/ d" Y* m7 R( a5 p. d2 f
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
* Q, Z1 C8 q! M3 `+ @" m/ Fin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
1 ~3 y( K" t+ A* `. m5 Yprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and! e' d& [7 ^0 K9 i3 t0 T
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
- K. h) v# _! g& Y+ ]Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal- T# E* l9 Z9 w
LePage Real Estate Services.0 A0 w7 T5 z5 G7 n: g$ |) s6 Z
4 `* w3 `  P( V1 z, j
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
+ s* u; {. Z" n: Eare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
! O, O. G2 ^) u: w- I) R: Wconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
% f1 ?, |8 @" i* |9 bsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the8 d9 D' ?/ \$ n
residential real estate sector.# L  G2 R/ p, O

6 v0 L  m3 o3 t* r& z/ L$ P    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation- s! H3 o; y, W& L. V  t; e
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)* l% M9 _$ y. G1 T- I' N: W
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5623 E: a0 i. \  i! K' I
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
. f& i0 f9 a/ \, G7 k. v. T(+13.2%).
; u+ \8 J: l+ k- T. ~1 p+ T
7 A0 T6 t# x2 Q  O    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
; o+ b, d/ @/ W2 D% ~9 G. Hduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
! [: z0 ?* P0 Qfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
$ W6 J/ a: ?$ }( e9 Lpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
0 p' y2 {; N$ M3 [' epresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.- G9 j9 j. N, }( Z; p6 @5 U, @
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We  Y1 F9 ?8 z% b9 R1 y# w, I6 s0 Y
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy1 C- s0 w6 T  U" a& Z
balanced market."
1 u7 ^  o( v" d# a( X  @0 U6 ?* V% l) Y$ j% B" v9 y
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,5 A3 l' _8 g0 v9 P# b; U) S
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
& ~* x) D: S7 B7 O4 _to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued5 ~, ~, C1 `: e, v9 F, B
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
; F6 @6 G0 L6 t: M0 I6 T6 m' Uenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
$ e4 q, R; {7 P, Bmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
5 V( s. w5 Z( y8 j5 vbreaking price appreciations.
4 Q7 {' k& v, j% K( `) K
7 R; b/ _2 D. o' i( S( k6 X( k    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
, D8 _6 X" V( }% Deconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the- ]- S- p% d/ F. @3 O
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
# N- |" o( |0 G1 u+ u# X
5 O9 I3 s$ Y" S; K$ ^    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
; h; L# f2 A+ s" R; jeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer* T" j. D" }+ n
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
5 c. A/ O6 z8 Z1 D1 Islightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
8 o7 _: n4 Z8 Q7 }% rIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers8 I& k- y4 k* E6 S1 [" C; F
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of8 K: X" d' C1 E5 p& }1 [
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
3 `8 S# G! n2 j& v) H7 Y( n8 g( ~& ]" [' c" S% Y
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing  T% s$ p2 g9 h1 {1 F$ D
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
  a7 ?4 P( |' ~3 l9 R/ [: `/ qfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
% o/ J# R/ F/ a/ A7 lare markedly different than those found in the United States.) _+ e: y/ }$ C( ?9 I. f( V

' W* T$ H  G+ a9 P, ^6 U    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
2 d/ {$ X4 q* n& Q, hAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
7 z' d& N6 g' p" @& q5 r6 ^$ u3 Gfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the( t8 _. Y7 O1 d4 J2 N. V
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general- s; X! F* ]4 x
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the9 X8 m- n/ Q% d4 ^
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and& }: C& S% m; d
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization4 i5 v( ^  c" o2 p
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."# ^- {8 h7 o- R+ s

' M( D" q, ~2 \7 A2 y5 D    <<
2 @/ v3 O) m% K# ^# l1 u" a9 x                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
& X) s$ K" U9 {* }: a. u. F    >>; o6 Z& j& y, F5 l+ w5 k) q% R

4 }+ L! d! |1 {: b5 i    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
. S. h/ w  i4 S0 P" b4 [9 BHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
' l! D( Y# |7 E( j; {! C+ E5 y+ o9 bof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time) C5 f) Y. w0 T/ Y1 |4 e( n1 u6 ~
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
* |* j2 @; N. t# jrenovations.
1 K3 E4 b! k3 l- r5 ~" U
; Q8 d9 b4 O0 }# l+ N* k4 ?    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
0 w$ o7 b8 P8 y  y/ P! lincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
; A3 M5 `0 k" b- tcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
4 g4 i. t+ H5 [$ F, `" v6 L! fSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.2 ^5 ^+ I$ Y3 e8 J
4 e% j6 |$ C( U; G
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
, ]: [, o5 L6 n% ~- N6 z9 z7 i- Sslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
4 \( O6 _5 B5 d/ H: @% ^& Rquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new% }1 v$ R7 ?9 o- V/ k4 T
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
: P- b: e3 H$ M8 V. V  G* E! _to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
4 v) i, J1 J3 t! {' sand are instead opting for more affordable housing options./ S, h, u9 q# K, G
4 e' t$ X3 Z, c+ q
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
, Z6 ]/ c* E2 Y8 {conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their# k2 j1 {" v  p. \
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
# u$ Y3 U: Y3 U( Vwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian: J+ _4 u& z  G& y( {
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing, U! Z' C# T" w! h
buyers with more options when looking for a home." n" G  O7 Z( J5 j0 C$ A

2 @1 @2 d( Y# r) q2 m    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly. c$ |( b$ Z+ F6 m1 y6 B
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
" f: ~  Y0 r  N( {" lpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,' Q5 R% l/ k+ G$ s
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last7 L& b- ~$ H( v7 q0 A- L( M& f) L7 h# a
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
  j) F5 U  J& @% n: W' m- c
9 B  f9 I3 _& K6 z" l8 Z9 }9 i! _    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house$ v0 o% k, s. S4 y5 K8 L) v
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory3 d  {" g" g# v( w+ Q( e3 Q) z2 W1 u
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
( o9 g( T$ G4 s: g. Jfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
4 C( i( ^' Q* ?9 c, j* l: c0 Wwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the+ o8 Q, F" U1 c5 _
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
9 H" `4 T, u* `9 _7 j7 ]making a purchase.$ ]* a$ S. T; W9 ^  A! k. ^
, E" A. T/ y+ f
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing: W9 n* B% A3 ?  R: F
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong/ y4 w' V% ^8 M8 s
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city# Y5 U% [8 [1 s  L" a7 Z4 l
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting6 A3 F0 v& W" k7 Q( C
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
  \- R! V9 Y$ u; ^) w7 G6 g- Mamenities.
  V7 @! y$ \# ^
% R: y* P1 w' c" H    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels! Q  b' |) Y- o5 t  P
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand4 h# R) ?7 B  _1 g9 \3 d
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has: h' _; F) y9 v& v9 ~. n% G" N
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
" j' X8 f1 z7 n! ~. W% udriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
! u7 W5 L5 x/ s6 V; P: B, Q: uresidence, rather than for investment.
) c$ Y5 O" S$ J) W( F* T' n4 w9 m' u
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as2 R, A1 h' p( P  g; E% o1 u7 ^
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
9 H+ f: s! f4 n' R( Y; G- uin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
9 h, L$ m, g/ r" M: _0 p, tconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization. A) r2 G& n- G$ l+ q4 F
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter0 ]- n, z5 A( A
the market.- y4 n& r+ S* z6 e) @2 Z  w) ~
' o; k$ r: i4 w8 l) X
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through/ a, i- Z/ k5 O
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In+ T3 S+ }5 E0 L
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring7 b# [! |  i% y5 b
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due/ r4 R% g+ X5 R! B& Y- [6 A: ?' Z
to the shortage of available inventory.
* b' L" [9 }$ j7 b" J/ r( k  K9 r' h: W$ n& K- ]
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its9 ]) h8 h6 W& L2 s8 @
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains. ^2 Q0 m2 E! ^9 c3 W
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses+ K" [  r$ A& ?; l0 w( v4 O
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
8 {- g% Q, m& U
0 H0 {2 [0 b( ^3 @, r# ?; ~; K% X    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
- X0 G# q; o+ L$ [9 Z) tin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
" ?7 k/ h; f# Y) H* L! M. aunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
+ x: _. \. O3 @  tpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
8 m3 v1 P+ _% F* w7 O4 ]prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
& _! K% Q1 b) {8 i* Tseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
9 E+ i( d; h2 ^# nbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

4 \! |# G# T; W' u( N) o. P& ]5 f9 f* f& _4 J9 ]
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
9 B9 K3 u/ q0 s4 A. k' l# @as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
& I# q9 v, B6 A" mremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
% x# a4 \7 b8 omaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices# c) o5 m2 z3 l: x) W* J$ c+ R+ j
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
. h! z1 |. O: Q+ @( G- C" S) A9 Lin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
+ i9 X' {3 z0 i% j0 I" r, wtowards the end of 2006.
    9 D$ E) U0 Z8 f+ f% n7 A9 @
, h: k5 T& v: \  @! |. b, y
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
1 g" ~1 M. o' h& L6 c- Vinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable2 |3 [8 R! R! w  j& ^9 |
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse1 S5 ~  O5 ]/ H
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
/ I/ l/ P" F, F  \foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
+ w9 f+ n! K+ z3 U4 rpressure on tight inventory levels.  O' B$ u, C$ X- s
+ C, I" p# n: P2 k, M2 O
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
9 C, i- w5 t( X, z3 c& j# afundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
% o: q* L$ }/ {0 F. ginto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;1 l& J1 A: ~5 G4 y4 M" ]/ E
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
& S) Y" P2 l6 ]+ Wfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.! S) k" ]& j# t: u4 l' S- `

8 @5 {6 q  S( G9 r9 _    <<# Y: k8 _5 |( E3 X/ `3 \% p
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
' x8 _& j( B5 u/ {4 w; P% W# ]) n% ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. K# Q; z6 N' g" m8 l  l& u) w  M                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
9 {3 B8 e' s) f2 W    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- `! S" z& q, z( B/ b                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3& d/ c& h: M& s1 L% C- }* x
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
- ]% v3 ~1 i; X2 |1 g# T. z) t    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% I! S+ b% i/ y, v* [3 Z* }1 t
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000  ~0 q2 x5 E# p( H7 G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- o7 c' y. L' [+ W% j: k& U    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
: t" Y) j0 B, i$ C, C    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* R) x  ]3 R# _5 R: P
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000( _! q5 F2 g0 {' B- \
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 O8 I# e& K- I( [    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
" y) n0 {! M  [' ?0 m4 `    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% u' ~$ p4 `8 l5 j    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
% u3 v# @/ F3 v9 W9 E    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Y1 h+ Z5 d' u8 k    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
; @! ^- k4 H5 }. x# F& y+ i( Z, ^    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ k2 R/ e* f4 }, q" U( b    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,1851 Z& m9 l" t) g( Q( @0 }  W
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ l, R6 c! l. T3 @$ M- d
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
; R$ K0 p$ r2 q" Y0 z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ |  g& y5 U/ q* j# l6 N; G
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
6 b% k* G6 N) G" H    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* \0 ~2 r; O3 I
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707+ ~& A% \# [& x2 o# g9 @# M
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 v' E2 ~8 j7 q% Q6 F5 M
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,5007 N/ F- S! e) s+ a9 |6 g: ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 O0 H7 X: g, H* H4 [9 A    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
! h4 D2 x" c# y  a! k/ X    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' E$ _- ]1 P$ I& N$ S0 x1 s
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714; C/ }2 _6 i0 z8 p. f
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 P# _* x/ P9 p! p7 X3 v% b9 y' N
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,5004 M9 w: `; J2 e* ?$ r  ?+ y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& }3 D( A8 v' L: f# A
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
6 Z. n/ e; J- n" e. w. [: M    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# U: }5 n9 y/ T- B    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
  _. y8 F$ f# q% H) b    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 R* V# K$ O6 O

4 E3 P& U" F2 s+ r- c* G# Q    -------------------------------------------------------------4 \8 e! ~6 M$ f, y4 _
                               Standard Condominium
/ P* ^# j5 V7 m' T) a# |1 ]7 b# t    -------------------------------------------------------------+ I, N& Y* V1 o/ i# y" B
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo3 h  k: @* U: O$ I. b: E, x
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change5 ]0 o% h# ^/ I: b/ N
    -------------------------------------------------------------
- I; G3 s$ g$ t8 b$ V    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%3 E( o/ I6 w7 T3 ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------4 ]8 N% i5 b: _" W% J
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
( ]% `- l, c- w/ r    -------------------------------------------------------------
" s2 O, w/ X8 z2 N: K! B1 |    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A/ r6 O4 `! j2 U+ W7 U4 S
    -------------------------------------------------------------
& t# H3 q4 D; x# E& {9 R) Q    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
$ B- T# T5 l, T$ ~. U  v* x' K) O8 y    -------------------------------------------------------------
: h* K& s/ d# u- K9 e    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
& v/ f' @3 Y1 O    -------------------------------------------------------------0 l/ [: K! s2 |; o' G/ y/ A. P
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%" \6 B$ Z: |7 _: ^" U
    -------------------------------------------------------------8 {& ^! p$ v; I
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
* |* \% W- F9 j: F, v' T    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ n2 C8 p9 {" y' z5 L    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%. i% A) v: }: u5 G& x6 }' ?2 @
    -------------------------------------------------------------
( v; o& z" Q8 h, `! l5 {    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%4 r/ G* X: O9 h6 G! P5 w  w6 K
    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 S: ~9 P! a1 o& m    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
' ^  _8 ?0 h) G4 d  E9 H: {    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 \" x) b6 S9 |" |1 P8 C) @* g    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
( s$ a1 Y4 {/ _1 x' L6 k$ h    -------------------------------------------------------------
) [  P: Y0 u9 u) B0 f" D8 ]3 i' W    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%! w4 n: v5 ^+ r6 B1 ]5 u7 r
    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ r2 ?9 y3 Y& `, o/ v; Q5 v    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%9 I) P; n: @% {: _# Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------
  J% @$ }* h6 g6 k    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%- x/ o; Y; X! j2 a/ S' g9 V
    -------------------------------------------------------------
# O; R/ J* E1 s: K    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%/ y- M: E! T. x* t& C
    -------------------------------------------------------------: m0 w. \: b: b: z8 u. ~: j
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%, ~' B$ @! C- n! I/ t/ j
    -------------------------------------------------------------
! R7 C( K: K  P6 O# _, G    >>' M* h& e& ~) f1 ~4 j% A
2 P! S% l$ X4 j" C" b7 a( u2 R$ Y
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined3 H* c! {( [! T3 P' K& y0 x: P. V
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint8 l2 W' @1 H3 O+ k
John and Victoria.
) g4 u% L: u, C! c. z. V: z" W% F* u- b* Q4 M, S* q$ B  \
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
# W+ N( T/ D3 a% V2 |comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of! m* y- x+ d% m8 z
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
6 g5 r$ b! Z% Q" f: Creferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
! s5 o. F: q% t1 ]# I) x$ ktrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities0 \; ?  n# y2 |; L" o1 e- q
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
3 k' s  I2 N' q7 Y  `4 n7 Pavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current. `, @+ W) e/ N5 }! d
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
. }& ?* W% P/ U, Z  J* J( R% Q0 qversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on  P7 N% C: K, _$ p
November 15, 2006.
+ z: Z, i! S% |2 f1 O    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of) j+ h; m  f: z* y7 n
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge' y- @$ L. n9 Y6 [1 j
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
2 ?9 Y7 b5 m% p# }* T' Qavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-9-19 11:08 , Processed in 0.135262 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表