埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2040|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable ( _% ~5 Y" E/ X  S: C, V

4 ]9 ^6 T2 |1 b( u" X" c# N- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
( o  N9 e( R/ ~
% N9 ~8 m+ H' S0 d4 g9 U. b+ x0 ?    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market6 f, C7 Y. m* F+ c$ ^9 y
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
' w0 Z# ]6 y5 j; Y$ F. T2 |quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic/ O/ K" i2 F* \0 J9 f
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit& {/ w" K6 ]' K/ t, M
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and5 M, D* b+ Q/ S) }: L9 M
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
3 ^% Z0 }8 {9 Q- s) b2 `) BQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
; }7 g+ \. d: j8 a: V4 VLePage Real Estate Services.
' x3 X' p9 ]- D) H8 x; K/ M: ?* h# R% e# y0 N. ~
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters( ^! l. U* w* H5 B
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
9 [; ]: W9 z1 p. Y" Q* k0 E# p" Kconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and7 I- b8 G5 M* m+ d% f
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
! [$ X8 S- B0 m8 j7 n! Y  z% p  qresidential real estate sector.
$ J$ l" f" P, `2 y  h, k. ~7 y% K& _2 T* V, t9 G* z# O; c- r0 e
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation, n, Q+ C% [0 y$ g
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)9 F7 e" B! l6 P1 D. C7 O# l
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562( a1 S. y7 z% I+ O, N+ r
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3802 H) i' ~7 ?" B# E/ J- s( F/ f
(+13.2%).  Q/ k7 P: R8 ]8 Z( Y" L
8 p- |* n6 L! i0 {0 o+ G* C2 I# f* L
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
; t1 V; j; c* e: \9 ?+ l5 Rduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the8 `5 K( O. H' m. V- g5 t2 R
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
9 R; u2 @6 j' U$ `, s+ jpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
+ W/ ~4 w1 B/ w# T1 l" w: Rpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
7 O" e0 _% _6 \) ^"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We: F% C9 u' Z' x7 q- Z
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
. y4 n" J/ i" S8 [1 b! P' F+ f) I# sbalanced market."6 G: s& c% a( n8 C! P& v6 Z4 E
, |& k# \5 u6 S/ y
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
& |4 W  B7 I+ Z9 @# Vconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift' b+ o: k7 T! |& D$ A! `
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
6 m, g' [2 }$ ~; t+ F$ p1 Bthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
* t% i- O! e3 z+ lenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,& @1 _5 Z& S# S$ n. R
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
$ _, T& j' T' s9 J- j$ U( lbreaking price appreciations.
% Z& f% O3 e; \, I" ?9 \& z- a1 _* {% v) P8 C
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding: M% `7 Y- A. U, j  z( H
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
9 i5 S# |$ Y; s' r+ P% _. Jlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.# j' ]3 v% L/ m; j9 j$ G
" _/ E% n1 ~" p& {
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid  Y- h3 ~8 D: }" @" s3 ~
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
6 e+ _! T5 o. z! ]confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
" O8 \" b- z- n# L* Uslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
. C/ r) k7 X1 g7 rIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
" D2 v* z, x. y( Z) j: ggreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of! F5 X2 k' R: M, _2 w" C
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
  }1 d7 ^9 ?: e5 a& j: C2 N0 |2 ?0 t# D, ~
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
$ g9 O+ K1 y( A" H! Lmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and' g' |+ a/ [9 [$ h. l0 L- J! i( H
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada& x" c/ t: N/ i& ]" w
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
& q. D6 B0 l( A$ S  |' O( Y1 y) Q0 _; Q$ O: P+ S3 m* W! {
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
+ G/ M2 a! w. @! K" K9 I1 `& K. [American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's( d9 s+ s! k) A' D
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
/ [" z; A6 c6 E2 m7 |; ?/ urelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
2 {/ L; Q- d2 Eaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
) ?: u- T! S: o! K* cdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
4 R' d) E0 A7 N# Vaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
$ D  B2 E6 B6 G  b) qmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."! D- L5 O" A& V' m

; [) I' W3 O1 m1 g/ Q    <<
  I; H; u( w8 |8 ~* G, x                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
; o6 k0 m2 M3 f3 d1 [    >>8 `, n+ j  N! t0 ^; Y/ Q, F* F' X
/ ~# [. n8 ?  c# w9 Q; j  H9 a
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in" S0 J- i$ z. R! l% ^
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
) h, [! w  J1 ~( gof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
& O, l& E) j9 H2 t  q$ p! m$ }0 ?looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
  }+ M8 ^) z( V' E! L; W' i* K7 t! jrenovations.
/ [7 v, Z" m' E- r
* u0 o, B6 V1 J" l8 N    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
% g+ @, h& |+ Wincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
3 i3 ~6 q0 E0 v  Ucompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
# Y+ R$ Y& F& K+ h2 U% z4 mSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.# J; b; h8 w& `4 B4 |% q

) U# y# \1 Z7 u" j    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer) N' U3 A7 E& k4 ^. o& w; x) J1 Z
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the$ T. ^+ o6 v2 F
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
; k$ p% z& r& s! x" M600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores4 M0 A3 K: m. I. H# x
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
4 x/ [- u: H% |2 G) gand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.8 V- y4 ^2 A$ M4 D3 Z# g1 ?
% [4 H9 m* M) w
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced" f) ]2 u& q/ ~8 d- E' B
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their: q6 `3 Z! Y- N* O& X1 J) q
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers7 X" Y, J1 O7 {& H
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian+ B4 `! i8 U( A/ d
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing; ~5 |- ]& f) f( z/ n
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
; O* M* p+ A6 E& I" Z8 E- K! c6 ^! t& `) N, z( q2 Z4 m
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly! j/ Z" V& s. M! J* v( f7 u1 v
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
: i0 t2 h: z- E$ R2 q5 B* E$ Dpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,% x, l9 K! P2 J8 l
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
7 i. r8 O  ^9 W9 _. W2 ~few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
$ p4 ]  A8 z) v+ K) w; c& S/ v0 m1 Q" O) o/ A' I' d
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
2 t! T, P" f6 w4 b0 y# [, a$ pprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
0 D4 M/ U$ X* ilevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
+ b) x9 p! B) T+ [' ifirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
8 U8 w- g$ F3 ~' b% cwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the7 l4 W4 r  K! C
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
$ T( i; m) e" c- I8 {making a purchase.  d  s* [" }3 J' Q3 `% C

) `) x! G5 O2 i( \% |/ t    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
! e& S: u) L8 S/ o+ w. ~& gmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong, D' O4 _4 k& G) V! ]/ X2 c
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
: g8 r; q% f1 A( p  y, Ccentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
1 J6 L2 k0 l4 y* g4 G# Lattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown) ^6 U5 G2 a$ i
amenities.; I3 T- X# L  G* w
8 m( b# K! k, P8 d
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
+ P# \  @, u& a2 X9 ~throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
* S$ J, r" T* C5 l. W4 T! o* Nacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has5 G  w+ @% {8 W- R. K
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been2 q! i, t; L. Q6 }# F, j
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
# g. ]: F: X2 }! |residence, rather than for investment.
. D8 U1 t. F* k! }, Z7 i9 V: v4 |* Q( g; A1 `2 I
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as) \+ Z7 G8 Z+ ]  W1 ^
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted+ e1 Q. }: e, t+ Y1 m" K
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
1 L0 U8 _2 N& [- K3 G) xconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
, ^* R  b: m3 e. s" y$ c! N- Krate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
% i8 _: K7 p, D0 k: u0 ?$ Othe market.
# u, X7 H7 Z( A" E& `6 n7 s
+ N. ?: }1 y' u* k, W! j    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
( m) Z& y8 S7 h% P7 vJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
6 Z+ d$ Y# u: M: NAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring$ q/ t' I4 n3 ]( q: l& D+ ]6 d
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due8 P% f# c# a$ m( y& S( P
to the shortage of available inventory.
  M8 k' ~& q+ A9 K; |8 w1 W! G  g( g1 r( K4 I! W
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
4 j9 E1 S) _8 v6 Lmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains* Q( w7 x) _4 e0 {4 W& X2 K7 d
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
2 K. I  u& g* K5 ?- dstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
# A. k4 c7 {% V& z' e  l/ l' ?$ ]% M8 R- N2 ]# D; W7 e8 L6 a
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
5 i/ X! c3 v& min the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
# j) F6 e$ b  h0 a8 G& {: c! Hunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that8 I7 V5 `& D% E) O7 H$ [% m  S
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
9 ]  j5 J1 F6 ]) d3 O+ _$ bprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer* f4 B7 f) S* L& D8 `0 H7 ~+ g
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
$ o+ s$ W. k  J- m# t6 g( gbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
- M, V$ L# M- y' W: G8 M8 B1 }4 k

4 z' `" a1 P. s- f6 f/ \& ]    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter, |! S1 |; S4 K# U: F' s6 n
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
6 N$ r, h) g6 y/ z$ l7 M/ premained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
' e2 |+ ]+ a2 Y4 A7 T; L3 ]maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices, ], t: Q$ D: b* ?4 X. k
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve% m5 O  H% Q! t& ?
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
' E9 e1 ~: j+ e* [: s: r. x3 Ptowards the end of 2006.
    0 L% X9 Q9 J& n, U

. K5 i' D5 N! YWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
& N- z* v1 x: e. G' [0 b% Finventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable- A' e1 H, [3 U/ G: P3 t$ f& m. C
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse( M) c& \+ u4 T* {2 h  s
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to& G& Z; }7 U0 o2 n; H$ R* ]
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added) p2 q$ n5 U/ \& C5 N  Z
pressure on tight inventory levels.
2 L* g4 @/ T/ i- B* e
! o* O. E5 t" x+ t    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
# J& k6 D+ t$ {  p7 B- W" bfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
0 y* e$ p, w5 K0 }! Tinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;7 I" c5 [4 D% }" @' [7 E
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
/ l& _& w+ ?, K. L! k8 a6 zfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
5 s1 T! X% x! I0 ^4 B
% v& {8 q/ g0 q9 a0 D    <<! l+ z6 \/ ?/ r
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
* J: C4 \# v+ i, H
' c& U8 N- |- D8 ~2 Y4 ^: B    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ x. i. o  B! I" ]* Z( e! d
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
$ n  B, V) B( @1 B0 o    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, S+ W9 w. k7 q4 K9 B- W! u) i1 M
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3! P$ B5 @$ e* }; t3 j
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
: R( I+ D7 q1 X/ W1 a  r    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 a. H( t; \; H  d$ j- Q1 _- D
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
7 d. r' S0 u, s6 o  N7 i. k    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% m* m* q. S' u' g* S7 a6 _$ |    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,0009 t6 L% p( `, O  ]3 [( ?2 l
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 {0 _5 X6 a3 d  D1 r9 u+ w7 a/ W    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
: V# Y8 B) e6 x- \/ K  F9 |    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! I7 i7 g" W8 \- r
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -4 L" ^9 g4 o$ G6 I% a) F
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% H$ ~! s, G% n
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
$ j3 E  Y) d: z; o    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 _. g: k6 l6 p1 \
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
! @; |; q" {0 N) g. k& k9 Y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ z7 |2 g, m7 f: n& J    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
% Q& ^0 ]2 j9 C2 y8 i- M% f+ R3 f    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: f1 ~5 n7 z( e) Z: y1 s    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
- s/ c1 D6 y5 z7 W8 ~0 E1 _    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- n. `4 R3 D* W
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766$ U2 B( ~' m& p: k1 }' w! I0 p
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 @6 i. \+ x) U3 l! w/ V; P+ q0 M" S
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
7 {- d+ z7 L* _' B8 a' u7 p3 I8 V    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" {+ Z* J5 y2 K: R7 O    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
/ h% Q( k" ^) p    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) \& k6 w0 p* P) ]% X    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
0 |! Q8 c$ F: u2 e$ J& y) D    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 i+ v* J) Y$ |2 C
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714. P: u0 K" F0 `  w9 Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* R/ P. N* C( g: U    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
& A4 M8 ]+ ?+ g) w& g6 z. n    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* V5 m) C2 A' r0 c) ]) F' z4 Q- q
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
0 e2 U& _% ?2 @% j0 x+ u3 j    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 [0 k7 X4 O( \( z+ t* _" Z$ c
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,8603 r7 ?% f  `5 E* i" L* o% t
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% l4 e4 w# ^. L- @

; M* A7 p9 ?1 p% l1 D    -------------------------------------------------------------
" G, g. C" v, E; |' D0 z                               Standard Condominium5 I$ V' G+ c7 n* x1 y# \8 F+ r
    -------------------------------------------------------------# u" }0 g7 h% p# e% _7 H' S
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo( k! F. t$ j1 L; |! r7 h6 O
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
/ ?+ F: p7 @5 j) J! Z- ~    -------------------------------------------------------------
- _1 Y0 f9 h+ x$ O    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
, a8 B" T% N7 C- P7 |    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 k3 G) l% M2 ~, h7 Q- w5 O4 n    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%8 h1 x; q7 [( I' k# p
    -------------------------------------------------------------/ |" [2 {# |9 Q8 k5 _7 x( z* T
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A% \3 o0 b$ `9 [- H' O5 ~3 H2 C
    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 j' [1 w( d. D0 ~& {( u    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A" O4 A/ E4 I: \! L/ ^/ q/ q8 Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------2 F2 w6 W9 a) o: r& I: Y+ u& U7 d
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%2 O/ u9 D/ V% a: r- s1 l$ F
    -------------------------------------------------------------( N/ @& u9 k9 ]. G, c; y% [
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%, G7 ]1 e) h% A& T
    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 ?0 |& ^3 I! }7 ]0 O/ W    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%6 k( f" b( U7 G0 |! ]) N5 N
    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ c* t2 {& R( ^. ~% {1 \% }% V    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
+ a; A6 D+ r, {/ X: s    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ I4 ?+ E: f" y: ~* q9 }& y    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%" l  _0 Q) N3 i! B7 q9 p
    -------------------------------------------------------------" x0 w, Q: b. U' B, y4 n
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
5 U* l% o* U7 L, f; g9 T0 H9 R: b8 ~    -------------------------------------------------------------
( y& ]" h+ `4 _, _5 ]# H    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
4 E( I1 G( ^) D% L    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 D4 q: G9 X8 r! R4 h' Q* f" ?5 J    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
0 k/ ^' n$ a7 ?5 c    -------------------------------------------------------------7 _" c8 _! o; ~. h% I. c* o
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%' v+ m0 L: u- e  b
    -------------------------------------------------------------2 Q. P, @; ]* Z8 T# L7 |6 b2 E9 a# v
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
# E9 C' Y& b/ I3 Q    -------------------------------------------------------------' j# l# |7 B' G, b
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
  M% z( V8 q! E- E* d    -------------------------------------------------------------0 R4 y, f2 B- Y1 w
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
% _5 l' n/ {4 n0 C! ?    -------------------------------------------------------------) m4 t$ {) |1 V0 q( D% A- x' k4 d
    >>3 A5 m" x* n9 B# P: _9 T3 r
- e1 h% |6 i/ u
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined6 t- T/ \4 e2 [. f6 I, j0 q
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint0 r8 g+ k$ B5 @5 y
John and Victoria.
- z- _5 g3 x9 q5 {- j% x( I: r  {* v$ N! o, }" m
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most6 v& r: V" T6 n7 C2 Q
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of' G0 @, K; |. t. u: Z
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
! G, p& F" B" \/ }9 preferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price3 H. \4 p" d" w" l. n
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
, i8 ~) ^4 f( y+ Q( Jacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is7 i" ?$ o, l; J1 l
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
9 q' N/ c) t& G3 e5 s! lfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
  D0 _0 t" t% d1 m0 eversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on5 d  p9 J* _- R) F* y) U3 Q
November 15, 2006.# f8 B, x* \" J
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of9 C# n, D3 p$ o5 F! {1 ~# b. l3 Z/ B" g
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
- ~/ n* R8 i8 a# p  }6 ]provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
# L2 q# E; i: U7 ]$ yavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-12-21 22:54 , Processed in 0.084957 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表