埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2287|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
$ d, S3 W% {, h, p
. V+ P1 d1 S" V( I; Q2 A( |+ d- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -7 }, k( z/ M( Z' r) L
+ s% E) c, \4 a8 M# P- V% @% F6 a
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market6 p2 t" c4 x8 }" h5 E8 t
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
8 f. Z/ R) K: F/ `3 k  equarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
% X1 Y; v/ R5 v, m) r" rin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
$ ^" k! K- B% H9 k- @price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
+ g0 q" O) g+ G* O$ `2 ]more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,+ C0 v" g# b' V8 @: {2 D
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
0 _; q; ?+ d" N" M2 Q5 g' K, KLePage Real Estate Services.  r# ], U7 Z: s; S) r

6 _: M2 p- |6 j! m    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters" C# l1 ~1 c8 Y% G. x- |! ]
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic7 R2 G( T6 f3 j
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and; G7 m# a# D/ i% J6 F
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the, }$ C9 \+ E% P$ o
residential real estate sector.; x- r' x: n7 l. s
) d) f8 B1 K, }" U$ v: l
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation! q: x" a3 U9 q# o7 |" s0 G
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
" \7 @' k" D" Y1 K! nyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5625 G7 _. n/ s! R0 Q6 X
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380% [( n# {" E# j' B  w* O
(+13.2%).
8 @, r- q# J3 z( @! ?) d* W
/ N" f5 A3 D# L; B1 c9 ]7 k: J    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth- g% S: f( \3 V7 Z+ U
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the! Q8 c) S; [# v
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
2 I5 n! E7 C. _" Epoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,9 L. }% c. N0 ~  O
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services." T% E  `# Y: R0 e  O4 x8 j+ _
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
- X# n4 S9 `% \$ p5 I% Awelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
% |- _! D) Y: C2 Z/ n9 e6 Rbalanced market."( S  Q" b1 P# H& `/ p) Q) q
4 M9 o/ G$ e. B2 q+ G
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,4 q% r- P  |# ~3 ]# }
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
9 E9 \: U( K, y9 }6 ~" Fto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued/ _! h" a' X6 E  a9 T2 j
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
. Z/ P( Z9 G! k( s4 P( U- t8 ?% W1 ~energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,/ [1 T- a6 r: k3 R4 m
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
/ h2 g% ~! j' I/ s" k/ Zbreaking price appreciations.& K3 D" M6 `% |; c  @2 f  T: B
) u8 q0 \7 T: {* V( @0 q
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
+ q3 d- j5 W' k9 T9 U& ?economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the% ?' q) [6 ~8 I+ C0 v7 D3 i$ H
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.# {1 d: N% H9 W
/ c8 l$ q( w# c1 B& N9 ?8 x8 F
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
  P0 A$ K! Z( reconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer: ]+ {* i' C+ v! ]( y* j
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off5 e& D$ E4 n; r7 l
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.7 Y; L8 ~+ B( o7 K! E1 p% G
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers7 a- o. U/ I4 _* n+ [
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
1 [$ |8 x- [+ Dprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
, n- r; e" R* W5 [( \5 n% h. N7 u$ j9 P5 y; h0 r+ _) a+ M
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing! L& r: x- f1 `
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and# l) p- p. A! r  w& d% n
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada+ l- o1 S4 M8 Q* Y# @+ a5 F! k
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
% k7 O; O9 N- `6 N7 |# a9 N0 |& Y1 s/ H8 g( o* C! a4 \. J# u
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
3 O: Z3 ~. t: o: bAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's& G$ J& d2 D% E* e9 n  ?! |& J8 t
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
8 f- @: V9 H9 l1 E2 m: h5 Orelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general/ ?1 C" m, a3 }4 b% [, R) x
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
+ {# p' h: @8 D8 Rdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and* A& ~6 E  R; I# h
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
" @1 q, Y9 o( Z! n7 Cmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."0 b' G. ~/ f8 N9 K: n% S; h0 }% S' k

$ v; M1 c# b# @3 [' f, x    <<
7 T, u0 J5 K& Z, @                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES+ l. q- [+ N! E4 y
    >>5 m: n+ @) n% j9 v- O9 f& \; p3 s
2 x" T9 C* ]2 d; V% K  [5 i
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in4 D- j/ {* y* U1 G- K
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
3 m$ x: ]3 ?: q  j. Aof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
5 v( m- T6 L5 _looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
( m( t' a" Y6 M6 I5 W9 b3 t9 crenovations.
! g" T( c9 W0 i$ D- p( J, j
1 d' v3 J: J9 \$ `4 o) g    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
3 Y# S) h9 h; D* J& Hincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation" N6 U7 j7 g/ a+ D
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
1 M* p* R8 W1 K; eSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.# g& e9 u; D' ?- J) c7 N6 _( _

# I! G4 f2 r, @* @2 x; b    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer: J% u0 y6 g3 J% e& A
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
( F/ ^. X- h# V6 s: ?: N# }quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
- i% j5 T# G2 K' h; r0 y2 u600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
; B0 d  @! M. W( Y6 D, J7 ]to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
9 s+ D. F  a* N4 V; m9 U! G8 ^and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.0 z" A- G& H$ k5 F" T$ q

& B$ C- S7 E$ a" j* e3 B    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
' _$ r2 L: h& u+ P' a2 [+ hconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their$ ]# N% O0 Z! Q# X, k
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers4 T# ]! T# {- I6 S8 V7 d
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
5 }, E6 M6 F7 Z! ~$ M7 gdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing! I* p: H0 h% ?; F% w+ e* F
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
3 ?' J3 p9 v7 f9 C- X" v8 {2 K* |" u* ]# i, l! a
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly  X7 H% Y9 a+ d: e) n4 {+ c( |/ w0 Z$ b
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
. o# h3 z  U3 a( L1 h( Tpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,% y8 K5 D3 W8 l' z0 K6 \" ]% C0 \8 Z0 }' }
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
9 @3 D( i  x' S6 p; f. D% w1 nfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.5 M1 }9 Z( y: [% u3 ]2 C4 }

, B% j" z" ?5 e& k    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house! @% h- X* p& C3 I# t
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory9 d, ~" G7 s* b( z$ L+ N
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting; e" \# u1 ]+ a; Q, q
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,: Y( R( u' X2 E* [
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
6 W' m# S& f- dpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
; {$ K1 N  V& }5 }* xmaking a purchase.
# X% n' `" R* t* ]0 b# }
5 d6 G- p1 }  Z4 n6 C5 P    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
! l# H- @  O; _+ r/ ?, h8 lmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong) g- o9 J. x4 j: s
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
7 d  N: i. |" l7 Wcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
0 j3 Z, y& d7 ?. G' ~8 [attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
2 T( d% q* \9 u9 @amenities.
# r" U6 g- U* k3 B5 Q& j, |( }8 N$ Z8 Z& S
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels" ^7 |) G" m: D; k+ n9 t
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand* M# l. S" C4 j0 G3 i$ l
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has& S3 _+ G+ d. ]7 R$ N- e  F
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
( j3 g6 a4 s% p+ h3 n6 `driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
5 x2 X  o+ m" x+ \; @5 N- dresidence, rather than for investment.
5 N- s" N8 I( n& w" m6 d2 |$ R/ n5 v6 w1 P# a: G) \# @
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
; `7 Q1 d/ y" h- Bhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
" `- w7 F, h4 ^9 k4 z3 Zin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
* f3 ~' z2 `% [) Q; x7 xconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
5 k4 M2 b" f5 A# ?! n& Qrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
8 ~. z5 Z1 c4 n7 z% O4 f  g& Athe market.
6 h# w! I$ g8 F$ {0 D' d
1 z: M$ y' R) m" M    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through& ?4 q  w8 Q8 Q0 l' }1 o( N4 Y) O- }
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
9 p% o& o7 ]9 T1 n0 A6 E4 T& yAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
# v# L# k$ I: N9 u, dmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due7 K( }, X0 g( U  F9 [
to the shortage of available inventory.
0 x! ?' M0 F% p/ l- }/ x3 V9 ?7 {9 t. j: \" t. a' ]
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
) p$ {5 i5 t5 l( o! o9 C+ Smomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
4 ]( H; k. N% `# Z: z$ y+ x+ A5 O9 O  y% Nvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
% C! B' G# c# {; [- `" a6 Estruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.- o0 K5 f% t3 A
8 t9 P; p1 c/ M1 {: x* Y
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
# ~; ^) v, ?0 ]- r  K) yin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
/ q/ ~4 x. S7 G+ q$ F% o7 munemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that1 Y1 K% P1 a! X: U( q
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring3 [- ?/ e) Z% }1 j3 y( w" d0 G7 o
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer' c; O! C: l6 i
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
3 B" w: U9 ]- A& f1 K- ]* [8 `1 Mbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

. n/ ]' q6 k- v! ^, ^' I4 E7 h5 i' `3 K* s/ d, |+ R0 d% c/ k
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
5 H7 q6 u- T: @. E4 N  P) V3 _, Fas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
& g8 Z$ H, ~7 uremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
" S0 n1 y3 s, [maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
3 x  R( f" s6 {5 _* l- n3 rincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
; N) G, \0 \: {in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
5 u3 b" O: s3 D' N( E( Q' |$ Dtowards the end of 2006.
    ' X- m- e6 N) a+ b( J

" ]  X/ E) T7 n" r. _9 SWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of" t7 j! P+ |4 B9 W. e+ k, D' S& T
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
  Z& d/ J$ _# W1 B: y% mto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
3 U5 o5 o% p0 R5 ^: C# F" Ogroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
# d4 F: k: E7 `1 l, L  X7 Xforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
% q" C# x+ [$ }4 p# B5 _pressure on tight inventory levels.3 T. C( f+ ~# n% p7 u0 Y3 H

! l3 D! A0 ?% q9 b0 b0 G+ i    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic1 C' a* e4 K- N- a
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
% V/ }1 x9 k; _. qinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
0 J3 ]2 y9 @: p3 L, [% j. z5 b! vwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
- A& ?4 p/ J& G7 U4 Z: Bfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
, m6 s: }" O. w( H+ p
$ A3 r& z4 r1 }    <<
3 N. L/ Y2 B0 ?' I2 x/ ]5 k      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006( `: a# i+ c9 |- ?2 ]3 L

$ H# C" P7 C6 e    -------------------------------------------------------------------------. F; u; `' i$ P* J! A5 }/ G
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
+ g! Z! ~! ], Y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 r% a% B$ d9 r# M* J8 q
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3- |# E: T, s+ A% P) d3 H# k; @' l, [
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
  O/ W2 |7 o; \7 {8 C) ~& G    -------------------------------------------------------------------------. ?# }5 @. t3 `% j
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000- ?2 m2 B1 J: G/ |" V% E
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ l) N) N9 G5 n% a  t    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
2 S# b9 E$ c1 r" D8 o    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" O( T3 R5 F; |& b
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
( L) i8 T: h/ A4 O& t6 [! E    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ B& w* D" r% T$ @$ d    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -0 u. V- w/ _3 {* h/ t, g* k' G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& E1 x2 t/ Z5 [. H! ~4 |    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
' \$ ?8 D( q6 w  V, z, G2 s    -------------------------------------------------------------------------. a/ ~/ p3 V' {
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
/ V7 a; D( N# G, @# I( d2 `9 j    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 O9 `0 V8 j8 e    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185# w7 C8 v- d7 e; G+ Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& c  t+ |3 P5 J8 T2 ]
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250! K- y- N3 Y& x. W
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* m3 P) [" _, q" }# [) E! \
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766: P, N% e7 I$ S8 R
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' X- ~& T7 g8 T    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,7072 L  \( a+ A4 s: j2 ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 q' g$ I6 ]+ J- \9 x# r4 J    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
/ z: ]3 {, y: Z: l' ~, ?* f2 x7 O    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, q9 M  `2 s  a# p* ?" c$ W7 t
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389$ }0 P8 h" f% G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ z4 k9 l7 @) ]3 q
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
0 V3 t3 V& p2 M& R- ?  X    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 @7 C/ R& j+ e8 t3 L# O0 [
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
/ V3 F; `# e  Q5 X3 t. Q- m! ?8 `    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( e. W6 f# `9 o4 Z    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,0009 n" {( c; O; c& U1 v1 J
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 T# J$ f# D' [- o( Z
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860! s, E) ^3 ^$ G+ Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 m: q- m# s4 ^  v1 s
8 D+ i5 g  `$ [    -------------------------------------------------------------" I- e' ?- z" p
                               Standard Condominium
6 \" }0 C6 f2 }  k    -------------------------------------------------------------
  Y# O8 V% N# ]" ?                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
6 B: F3 G( k2 P9 z+ y+ s' J    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change+ z& a) d& O& d1 X+ W
    -------------------------------------------------------------7 H, Z% ~9 ?8 j/ K% A4 r
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
! {$ C/ K2 h3 y  p& O3 {    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 m" |, Z; R' \+ d* y- L/ z+ v    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%/ p7 [6 g$ v. ~' d5 o
    -------------------------------------------------------------: w  B* _' T: O2 D
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
: g0 f+ w$ G; z: @5 u0 c. t8 U    -------------------------------------------------------------6 M0 [1 g# o# b, P
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
+ f$ w. h+ u& q4 I  J' ?    -------------------------------------------------------------3 j, k( `0 d* X7 x- H
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%. U. e' A% s- \/ o. c8 ^" O
    -------------------------------------------------------------8 \9 k9 w4 A! _1 H- p. Z
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
; ^! g0 I* r) @    -------------------------------------------------------------
! z: I4 Y: \. ~9 x    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%/ _/ `8 @. a( g
    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 T& ]% l9 ]9 l' R    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%( h1 m7 _/ C% |! J; E
    -------------------------------------------------------------; G* k  B9 v  i! T  D* y# W0 v
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
" ~4 K4 T0 E1 B9 S1 B    -------------------------------------------------------------
* i. g2 N4 u$ a5 S4 Z/ ]    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
4 I0 Q1 P" V1 G9 S! v6 K$ c    -------------------------------------------------------------! h- Y/ ^, |5 M' g1 U
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%4 T6 I- t4 \; ^& t: C* O( D
    -------------------------------------------------------------
( Z% p4 d$ u! Y5 N2 K; ?    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%; K" w4 S! }2 T- e$ t3 r7 }
    -------------------------------------------------------------- k2 a+ O7 F' S; r: w) M+ t1 c
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%# X- L" L+ p- ^4 ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------: @% ^: i( ]( Q/ \+ p: X
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
/ y1 d' p2 ]4 p' P  a  A    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ G; D! S+ |' p& B' a7 P( ]9 p    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
+ b6 q/ C. n( u- h8 q    -------------------------------------------------------------; R3 q8 D* L" ^8 g0 j) ?1 U9 U* P
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
  k. q# K( |2 {0 Y2 `    -------------------------------------------------------------1 Y1 w1 M, ?: T4 f* N: G
    >>. N+ \  Y- s, v3 Q. W6 r3 B
$ V: r% C- h& e" U: [6 l* ?( N, J
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined- G: I, ~  k5 {" w
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint6 |/ e( s9 x) p6 @$ x& _1 A
John and Victoria.
: ]. h* Q' E' f9 b& W8 Z; p2 {. y  k0 G% f
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
$ M! y8 [( P4 ]& Y' Scomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of8 {6 ~8 r5 W  }% q. J
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
$ i7 C2 v" H; O. y  ~/ ureferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
1 k6 ^) F  ^5 ~# v: D# W0 ~$ ntrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
. j7 i! j* c. K( x( e: eacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
* ?0 F8 X" o* n# t: Havailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
+ I4 [; Z# {- n! e' u/ G2 I9 cfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable# g3 L5 c7 E# R. O
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on* _, u1 i2 X! q- {' f7 P
November 15, 2006.
- k9 M9 T- E+ f, L- ^: s0 d2 X. W    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of2 [& s5 R  T; f& g  q4 a. A  J
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge$ @- E" P+ `% E! ~- s) o8 Y
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is5 j: h  u% W9 j& a0 U; E9 a
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
大型搬家
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-3-27 07:47 , Processed in 0.231733 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表