 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly% j# b* @7 i' C+ m3 N4 X+ P
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove$ h; u3 n* d. D& j# `
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house$ Z$ L8 R8 W# R( F, y9 g( m
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
" N# _$ f% i/ F: @/ mfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This4 [* y8 r* R2 ^: i$ ^8 e! u
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction7 I [$ O1 l# } o
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately3 H m8 ?: M1 }* K2 o5 J
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past1 T1 D2 ~4 b, U0 x
three years.
' F) [# Y1 m& pBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from3 v% s/ ^7 N h+ {% f- K# Y
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
4 D/ S1 x, s5 H4 o4 |affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects/ t4 C& Z: O# P3 t
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
7 Z9 g' c+ e7 q- q$ Pto fundamentally justified levels.
' S/ q$ p+ u( i m, q% OWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
2 x- g0 q3 V1 t& @. d. p, q* J( I1 mwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and
8 p. R2 A. P. y F. { bthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”, f0 r0 A7 O O- `7 Z9 B" @! ?2 j
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although% L: D {8 n! q% _; l
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
4 i. m& W' T% D( \“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where- u/ r6 @2 p' [' s# ~& I8 O
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
6 ^1 `' I. Q6 gthat is now being rapidly reined in.3 E5 w. L3 h% b
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs," A6 R: S, Q& ?5 G9 S
the construction of too many new homes over the boom! t( _/ [1 D$ P; J! f6 L" f
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh m- H5 _ I# i8 r
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers, u6 w Q/ B( M4 y) i) u) M9 x
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
) |7 F4 ^- L' } U2 s# |" oremain choppy and new residential construction will be+ L: u L9 E- }6 X; y! H" X
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction4 Y0 Q- ]1 P+ L; O* u | M
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
1 a! ^+ V U5 E( \2 J( ato persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide) H9 E% a* e! ~1 \! p/ I
residential construction will fall further to around
1 @" x' B( n! h! g125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units1 B: E# ]( H- `5 o8 S
in the fourth quarter.
; _% r6 }/ X% o" m- gTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,! O" Y9 |& h+ a7 Y. g7 n; r% ^
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
1 K0 X |$ `3 @4 @8 Xfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
v9 ]4 c, t+ L5 Q; \! zprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
6 Y/ E: R: v1 | B) Pvalues since house prices should track incomes over the4 z& x- ^' K s. u: c0 n( a
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we* _% K5 l: @5 `% A& l' _
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
. N J1 x8 R' w8 {of residential construction.
! `- [% g8 \- q7 ]1 xTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a- C: k g9 S* I2 p
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction' ~& i, c& B: I! E
would have occurred if housing had been priced
7 {& \6 W" J: R. U6 noptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
: `/ k g8 A0 P. P) v- l) Q5 \fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
8 w. a" ]# ?% x. Tunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too8 U5 _. R* k" [3 A2 _
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.$ p, N5 C* z t/ W' E0 J
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
- Y$ ^1 Z8 w1 v7 w* E% z4 ~where housing demand will further contract under waning$ C1 f1 k2 i# W* o0 t
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
' L0 s1 ?3 Q+ \already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the* o$ T/ v a5 `4 z
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
% W; O2 d" i, K3 ]; I& X" s* `$ tbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces& q# Z/ y1 u( r# r2 f9 \# e* B& P
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural. i; ^3 F4 B9 H" }8 _' q/ m5 D
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.6 v& \( M2 Z7 z! a7 [7 q" H
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
& G. ?; w- `" _* W0 O Zstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
7 J( X, t+ ^0 w1 QMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
U2 P; p; c4 U; k A+ rgiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership$ e3 {" X; a, B" J# o" |/ H
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
6 a$ `: `# X: pcyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears2 N2 w5 f" z8 r0 Y* C+ F' J' R% J
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
" L6 w3 a. b3 d" s) ucondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically. C" q* N R$ l9 q
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
0 g; Y* J. h1 W, r5 H! |construction mean that record numbers of condos will- H7 q. o. k1 d' y3 D$ ]; |( T
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as* Z2 }* A' \) r% {. h E6 M) E
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
! a1 g$ H( v" v# O8 }* Bspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while) v6 }8 Q! x* x
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
7 L" u, g8 w, W4 oanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
/ W/ L5 {; i: f: Tinter-provincial and international migration over the coming& e( m9 }4 T6 R9 {' G$ C
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,3 C; c' B V" B G
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding." C. Y6 n0 ]/ q$ t& H1 N9 V
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING3 H5 ?0 o5 P- Y1 T6 T# @" m
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
. x* L+ T% g( J$ R2 MGrant Bishop, Economist* O$ |- V. B! X; Z- m+ y
416-982-8063
$ l5 H9 Y/ A, HPascal Gauthier, Economist
$ A6 A! m5 a& M. ?1 D: F416-944-5730
8 W2 V/ s2 i5 ^6 j) x. I0 _8 Z% T& p" ~( |# V
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|