 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
: c& ~9 _/ }) n0 v4 mDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs8 ^5 w& J# X1 p# r2 O0 s) R4 E$ c
3 t8 ^ k1 |. C3 ~2 x1 NEDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
, A$ K, D( R2 y' g4 M
$ U+ G3 D6 h9 @4 p4 YMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
4 [6 O3 F0 V$ B6 H4 l$ t- p, W- Y, Z* |6 z( e' P
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.* f( K2 M3 L' A9 o; {3 y8 @# j
# t% B0 W m' y: w4 C) g" [0 mDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
0 L( c2 ?- Y: K! c; e/ h- \ S Q- d2 f
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
( @, c u; o, P4 S2 W
3 V% h9 A4 F7 E& QDow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
! T4 M9 y$ Q$ K% [9 k* C* p6 v3 j8 W' [* O- K
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
. X" k* u( E: S# h' ~% m( {. t' |# o
( \5 L$ `5 e- v9 @' e7 @; m( T0 dPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
% P' B8 O/ [8 K* {- B( ]
+ h; R# G5 B$ vDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|