埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2273|回复: 2

[其他] Dow化工亚省工厂将裁员

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 13:59 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
, g  b" l3 J9 ], n* WDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs9 v- m! o# F* w! e% U
& U/ ^  P3 I9 W
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
/ [4 D$ C4 ~8 v' ?/ o) E! ^: l
: a& a2 [4 v' EMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
7 O) [! ]; ]: O5 S+ R0 e- x( L  a
1 `/ c4 v  t  _The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.9 x; E$ q: ?. i
, T4 E, y4 V/ {0 s5 q5 L( [- B
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.; y) W: y2 w4 I7 A0 c

0 }5 S" }- h* YDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
' D5 J: U6 E2 i7 q8 V; m- @5 k0 g5 c$ d% W, d# G% r5 O, c0 s
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.; D+ x7 [0 O* b" P3 s; b& T1 _( Z

3 s% a  G+ o" M4 m6 D% g6 M/ B+ EDow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
6 {* `0 K# Y$ Q% p. z! ~6 ~' M! b# u0 ], B
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.6 p7 h  N4 E& F; @

; K  L* u- w  i2 HDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.”
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:03 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:57 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-6-22 19:57 , Processed in 0.173266 second(s), 15 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表