 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员* G" ]0 n$ X6 h5 p P9 d
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs8 c7 r5 @( Q! ?; [
1 d0 ]1 j/ r% {- F Z; x& K+ A
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.6 |4 u0 V4 d0 ?6 f" E: j
+ \$ W/ T5 u; a/ G _
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
8 r) z( N! u) r. z5 Y) A4 ?/ h
% s7 T% K% z! N4 [ G& OThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
# b& W& Y% n: Q4 y
, |: k8 }& g$ N9 Z( K& C, dDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.2 k1 q" T+ K6 d$ x4 q6 a) P9 }" W: ?* `4 r
/ [4 N" ]7 \) ODow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.. D# E# `7 x8 I" c0 |9 |9 x9 J# Z' ^
( _0 Y3 D9 B2 i: VDow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.; h$ y( R; f. h- D
. e& y1 v- j3 m
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
) P6 t: Y: V0 a& y( l3 T/ O' i3 j' M& h0 z; b( g
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday. ?- h2 o/ R. l7 v$ ^, |: \
& |' J! [5 `, Q7 o$ E" F/ X. t
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|