原则上讲已经没什么回旋余地了,但知道以前类似的情况,有这样两个不是理由的理由:' W6 M7 G' G( O7 a
1.在高速上超速,被逮了个正着,后来他上法庭狡辩说因为小便实在太急了,不快不行.3 S4 T. Y* M* i1 u C; d
2.还有个人闯红灯,也是没什么好争的,但他又不想付那么多罚款,他就说他是学生,如果付了罚款的话就没钱过日子了. 3 y H8 Z `' G4 c- _0 T9 p0 J & f4 z' J$ Q. f4 T上述两位仁兄都获得了减免.虽是下策,但如果抱着尝试的态度那也不要紧. 4 @' T0 J0 A; R3 J7 b2 Y) P$ j1 `5 z2 T( t3 [( N" R3 S' R/ I( C
[ Last edited by 社员都是向阳花 on 2005-2-14 at 10:03 AM ]
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,20058 _( w7 s I3 ^3 l9 ^
The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb" " s) q. }: U- \/ k% u5 @9 X & U3 V: J0 c/ N"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in 2004 and now range from $115 to $575, depending on the circumstances."' F- _+ g+ }: c9 m0 q6 o
0 p! P1 n& x' I3 h& r! NYou should have a chance to ask some discount.
到哪里查看到这个报告? 请告知。 这也许是个突破口。十分感谢。老实说,靠着托时间我很没谱儿。 不过,当时我确实没有让那个行人受任何惊扰。 是他看到我在前面,先停了下来。那眼神然我觉得他让我先走。 0 r! V+ L+ e, n# V2 O 1 Y& w4 e6 R( k7 k! v8 n8 X# b' x6 ?3 l6 ]" G
Originally posted by yuexu at 2005-2-17 09:39 PM:) f/ E7 k% b) T( L' R5 B" u$ w. s
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005 2 u7 W1 N/ V+ E& }, |$ q' XThe title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb" 1 W7 p( B1 l% y" h% e+ V & v/ B. M! L0 V"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in ...
5 P; H. E! {* L) C( T6 B8 PDo you have a witness ? Did you see the man give you expression that you just pass it first? Did you wave to him after you passed? Think about it and make a decison.