原则上讲已经没什么回旋余地了,但知道以前类似的情况,有这样两个不是理由的理由: {6 B, f. g% v2 _1 W; B' _
1.在高速上超速,被逮了个正着,后来他上法庭狡辩说因为小便实在太急了,不快不行.9 W' `2 l) ]6 C( ]9 n6 R; X2 }+ e$ Y
2.还有个人闯红灯,也是没什么好争的,但他又不想付那么多罚款,他就说他是学生,如果付了罚款的话就没钱过日子了.3 Y# F! a; c9 R! Y# t. L. @
0 l1 P8 R6 N I# t( E, e# S
上述两位仁兄都获得了减免.虽是下策,但如果抱着尝试的态度那也不要紧. 1 t+ c# H+ Z6 F' a' ]: _' Q, ~ 8 g0 c3 g& k6 z2 ~% H6 i[ Last edited by 社员都是向阳花 on 2005-2-14 at 10:03 AM ]
警察上不上法庭实际上没有什么关系,因为市政府/警察局常年聘用律师在交通庭坐镇,一场不落。当事警察到场不过就是多一个证人而已。如果你有把握推翻此案,则没有当事警察你就占了大便宜。其他几位的主意不错,错可以认,态度要好,但是可以哭穷,以得到减免待遇。' `6 @# P! W. ^ ^7 l$ B& p u
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,20055 L2 G n2 p- x
The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb" ; |5 D" E, ^5 y, i% H 4 s# c3 t5 Q9 ?$ p"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in 2004 and now range from $115 to $575, depending on the circumstances."3 \& V$ D m v% A2 N: r+ b
) R" d- j* O% mYou should have a chance to ask some discount.
到哪里查看到这个报告? 请告知。 这也许是个突破口。十分感谢。老实说,靠着托时间我很没谱儿。 不过,当时我确实没有让那个行人受任何惊扰。 是他看到我在前面,先停了下来。那眼神然我觉得他让我先走。! ?% d. q r9 J$ f, C0 f
* C* z3 b$ @: e 3 D1 v2 z, u( b! ^4 [+ c
Originally posted by yuexu at 2005-2-17 09:39 PM: . {+ t/ X1 {" Y! H; \% m' |/ _Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,20056 z- m z+ a3 g( |
The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb" ) V/ e7 @5 x3 h) J, C$ [7 g2 d " _9 p/ Q; I! H4 B) Z" r! V0 e"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in ...
Hi, friend: X' F& S6 s& V3 S: x( G & r j; S2 K4 n% j+ w6 q7 f3 S( qDo you have a witness ? Did you see the man give you expression that you just pass it first? Did you wave to him after you passed? Think about it and make a decison.