原则上讲已经没什么回旋余地了,但知道以前类似的情况,有这样两个不是理由的理由:) d, ~: j) P1 K+ A; N. z
1.在高速上超速,被逮了个正着,后来他上法庭狡辩说因为小便实在太急了,不快不行." a1 [7 \6 o9 V ^% l
2.还有个人闯红灯,也是没什么好争的,但他又不想付那么多罚款,他就说他是学生,如果付了罚款的话就没钱过日子了.3 V; ~' C0 s9 I0 x
/ s: i" d1 }4 _! ~" a上述两位仁兄都获得了减免.虽是下策,但如果抱着尝试的态度那也不要紧. ) ? U1 z+ U | m- i ( v6 x: X2 g8 R; r1 c* T* C" S[ Last edited by 社员都是向阳花 on 2005-2-14 at 10:03 AM ]
警察上不上法庭实际上没有什么关系,因为市政府/警察局常年聘用律师在交通庭坐镇,一场不落。当事警察到场不过就是多一个证人而已。如果你有把握推翻此案,则没有当事警察你就占了大便宜。其他几位的主意不错,错可以认,态度要好,但是可以哭穷,以得到减免待遇。8 ^$ l! O' e8 q4 w# w
/ o, \$ k, ?7 R
开车可是千万要小心呐!现在罚款比前几年高多了。
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005+ G g5 I0 i' v/ G* E' \
The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb" " F4 p; m* c! w: ]" ~2 l( v - [7 m: E r4 ?3 V' o2 v0 |"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in 2004 and now range from $115 to $575, depending on the circumstances."- p2 |4 {+ [. a/ l
4 D2 I# ], l3 L q# \; e+ R
You should have a chance to ask some discount.
到哪里查看到这个报告? 请告知。 这也许是个突破口。十分感谢。老实说,靠着托时间我很没谱儿。 不过,当时我确实没有让那个行人受任何惊扰。 是他看到我在前面,先停了下来。那眼神然我觉得他让我先走。. N$ F$ X5 c' I! O) d
( W: T- i; w! l% |
/ {% u+ T8 s# ~' }6 d
Originally posted by yuexu at 2005-2-17 09:39 PM: W' a/ o5 i7 F; V- J9 CHere is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005+ U, D" ]; D5 g
The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb" u- x! e: J% c; K' ]. x
* b' P3 l5 j4 G; s3 ~, j
"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in ...
Hi, friend: & k- \$ z( ^% m2 z" i 2 o! `! ^( J' Z* h! r% E* N* d$ K# _Do you have a witness ? Did you see the man give you expression that you just pass it first? Did you wave to him after you passed? Think about it and make a decison.