警察上不上法庭实际上没有什么关系,因为市政府/警察局常年聘用律师在交通庭坐镇,一场不落。当事警察到场不过就是多一个证人而已。如果你有把握推翻此案,则没有当事警察你就占了大便宜。其他几位的主意不错,错可以认,态度要好,但是可以哭穷,以得到减免待遇。+ E) `$ P9 r$ ?% G. q' d2 e. j. [( ]
' N2 S) m) k2 |: h; c) ]! U' ?开车可是千万要小心呐!现在罚款比前几年高多了。
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005 + E' F& \0 t* Z6 ?; y `The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb") h1 i7 [5 c3 L. d; l
6 i: F3 [- v6 z2 N8 @
"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in 2004 and now range from $115 to $575, depending on the circumstances." & L8 l6 n3 Y5 g f: C0 y3 }) h* \8 t6 `7 f9 _: g; N
You should have a chance to ask some discount.
到哪里查看到这个报告? 请告知。 这也许是个突破口。十分感谢。老实说,靠着托时间我很没谱儿。 不过,当时我确实没有让那个行人受任何惊扰。 是他看到我在前面,先停了下来。那眼神然我觉得他让我先走。 ) k8 H q& ?6 A * \) O. f$ U/ H : c; O, G7 {% R" ^/ L# n+ w
Originally posted by yuexu at 2005-2-17 09:39 PM:$ A' |- v4 y+ D+ I% B& J7 r |; H, O
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005 ( U& J/ d/ \- ?% Q& J+ wThe title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb" ; V( {9 B" y, E3 x/ j5 Z% L/ b$ Q. s/ m: v q# S; Z$ t
"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in ...
Hi, friend: ' F% m7 A3 [: L; N ) i' K; K7 g1 G- a# o" D/ \6 |Do you have a witness ? Did you see the man give you expression that you just pass it first? Did you wave to him after you passed? Think about it and make a decison.