 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
本帖最后由 小黄 于 2009-12-21 13:39 编辑
4 S: L, m0 b6 o2 J你也别整呢些弯弯绕了。你就说吧：CIVIC和卡车撞，谁比谁更吸能？谁比谁更容易死？
$ @# i7 w* x2 [) T降龙十八掌 发表于 2009-12-21 11:33 
There is no data available. If you do have some, please share. But please don't make up scenarios and data yourself, that's 意淫. Use a published source, or statistically controlled experiment.
) o5 i1 x9 s. A5 I% g4 C- J5 L% | y. C2 T! O4 L! N1 u
From the existing data, there are 3 types of death:9 K7 {& f0 F5 y; }; I
1) MV: multi vehicle collision, like when a Civic hits another car/truck4 L# l! W2 o J6 V# q+ U4 E
2) SV: single vehicle, like hitting a tree, or roll over ~ R2 x' i/ m2 Y* E
3) SV Roll: roll over, this a sub set of SV.3 G G6 o7 n* _. F, s
5 @1 B0 A- I* H2 p& p& }
For Honda Civic:
4 l7 u" x7 N3 G& `7 FMV 34+ M* l8 i! A. o
SV 33+ r ?6 z$ a" I+ t" [
SV Roll 13& ?* J6 F. w, w t$ ?& Y% L
; M. U2 A0 g% i/ |0 {$ WFor Ford F150 (including super cab, crew cab):4 N& T' P& X3 F+ R' C$ R7 c
MV 28~34; |* i3 \2 F0 P0 D
SV 79~94, r! u) J9 x X2 H
SV Roll 48~82
; d9 c' E5 b% J% f* h+ C' Z, N
" M7 i0 W. ^! B; S( D ~, GFor Chevy Silverado 1500:
1 Q( r: }0 X2 w: KMV 40
/ H: y0 q% w5 p+ `2 G) \2 o5 aSV 85
8 v; ?+ V+ N. c* X9 W% X" s5 iSV Roll 61
% y$ \! e/ ]% w3 h+ I
! z' _' P0 h1 T9 g: VAs you can see, not only would the trucks roll over more easily, they don't perform better even in a vehicle on vehicle collision. So, yeah, Civic is definitely safer than F150 or Silverado. |
|
楼主: kismet
狗仔卡
发表于 2009-12-20 16:58
显身卡
