 鲜花( 13)  鸡蛋( 1)
|
........." we have heard of customers who have heard or4 Y6 Y8 Q7 |7 v
read on the internet that Basa0 {/ w0 V4 ? T3 Q; W0 @8 G8 P1 G
is a contaminated fish7 K% k, l7 o& v- c% L
, with particular emphasis on mercury, U: I% F( k0 c7 m4 {$ M
. We7 { k0 V, L% Z
have looked into this and it is our belief these rumours are completely untrue and may
7 H6 w) u3 m' x2 Heven
5 k& t% h! B5 i4 k K" Lfind: r, J; g+ `# j1 \, J
their origin in a long running trade dispute. y+ F) i3 c0 n, i7 F+ |
The CFIA
0 ~4 k6 Z, ?) F J9 F2 {monitors all fish imports carefully, a; }8 W% _8 I. }, {* B' g
nd inspect
( ]# T" b+ t# N% Uall new importers and new species
% L! G7 H0 R7 {8 s8 R* z* l1 xwithout fail. Ongoing shipments of seafood are inspected regularly, but less often2 W! H4 t+ g* Y5 J! p& a0 O% `3 T
once they have
1 O# M1 {( ~: e# h& o0 m. nproved safe
1 n- ^1 b5 ~% j$ M; b. These inspections cover a wide range of potential contaminants, both natural and
1 G' {- w& z0 Cthose that may be+ V' O9 N3 T- F. X
introduced in the production process.
4 O7 z- C6 Q |( z, a7 t e, o/ FIf customers are wondering about the Basa, it is suggested you answer
; g& @, f8 n1 k7 psomething like this; “Our Basa has been tested and meets the Canadian: ~; m8 ]$ \- h% [! f1 p y' s
Food Inspection Standards in all regards. There have been things posted, S+ p! }+ T% k" K6 F0 y
on th2 C' h8 j4 [1 B5 l1 X/ E
e internet saying it may be contaminated with mercury but ongoing: D3 }1 {4 w8 f: \, @/ o
testing has proved those to be completely false. Basa is safe.” You may
* c/ r# v% w: o* G( L$ leven direct customers to the Health Canada and CFIA website if they, P1 k/ N3 Z. B" k$ Q6 w5 X
would like to research this more.
/ b/ {4 I4 F# M% M# B- RWe have
, T1 o% G* j0 D& x8 Freview' W8 X% N3 G/ e2 u$ `
ed) }2 E* f# t" X
the CFIA website about the wide range of chemicals, metals, drugs, and; O% u% `: _+ L" ?. J; r/ m; I
contaminants that are tested for.* V- I6 a i! C- A6 h! ]
We have also; q% V$ T6 Z6 j7 Y1 H
received a test report from our importer which8 g* \6 Z8 s8 F+ x6 e! m) G2 n3 c
shows that our Basa meets CFIA guidelines; L8 Y4 T6 g& m
.
2 f" n+ {/ v4 L6 \" ?5 WBelow, please find
, Q- ^" S1 q4 W& s! Ycopied5 g, [! M. w3 e& r$ p3 u/ H
sections' C# G' E$ }: E3 i9 P
of the Health Canada website. o! C' B: O i& u
that should put this completely% R0 Z* f9 m7 }4 J" X. \& d
to rest. The first section talks generally about where mercury is typically found. Basa is
6 o$ i3 F: p5 P+ a! }8 ynot
9 @: K. H- K' Ba* N% S9 p1 R. z& C
long lived fish
3 Q- N5 @/ G2 j. a' Zand is near the bottom of the food chain
' s) T7 J- ^8 F5 c% pso seems unlikely to be
( C! Q" s" }1 R [3 w5 z2 C# Xcontaminated
! k! E' i" u5 D1 t, _( [wit# Z$ @% c C3 C, E; e2 u
h mercury( A& w9 {3 X8 j7 {
.) S' p+ m) s. N) t) \ U7 O9 T' J
The second section summarizes the mercury content4 t( ]0 k% ]- V
actually found in testing' a0 q+ [+ t# H* s4 c1 B; x
in a+ p+ T3 ^/ m6 u
wide variety of fish
$ t) z9 i4 R& ]0 },
3 M# M+ j+ R" a8 t! j9 V8 xand Basa is at or below the .02 threshold that was used to show low. F6 w8 O/ K3 b
concentrations (it
: W& j4 U' m" h9 ?8 L'
1 c7 p- {) Q6 a$ [$ v: Fs about 3 pages long so I only copied the top section2 j, d9 P" D& S" I! U
contain
/ M/ F2 e) K; Y& B5 Q+ aing B
7 P7 y' O, ]7 easa). Over" H6 g* W6 P; L2 M1 u1 T
.05 is the regulated level where it is considered important to advise on consumption limits. If you
1 c8 Z% q) B! d# y6 {want to know more I have included the link
- T& y5 }2 \9 i3 G4 Ps
4 @; P' k4 x& V6 G3 N) bto where this info is found.
3 R. F/ m* n) xhttp://www.inspection.gc.ca/engl ... /import/inspe.shtml2 }7 y' w$ @& l7 {+ p A3 J) ]% L- Y! w
http://www.hc
3 d8 _, D7 V$ x' G: _0 K8 `( r-6 X8 c) m; \3 Q) x Y
sc.gc.ca/fn
0 [ K! M3 R$ Q-) q2 B) B* ^* q7 J
an/alt_formats/hpfb
+ t; f( f# t8 N/ k8 K3 e% Y-1 q9 y. |8 j7 U. s2 N) t6 R
dgpsa/pdf/nutr
6 a0 `, I7 }- C: E3 Xition/merc_fish_poisson
7 ^, P& t$ ^$ g6 _-) K& j& N0 I0 j. V7 I2 n0 `$ d: E6 ?* W
eng.pdf |
|