 鲜花( 9)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 竹帘儿 于 2010-3-4 21:58 编辑 " A1 }. s& N( O- v" O; `' r' g
是阿,车子就是铁包肉,最重要的不是比谁能撞过谁,应该是比较出事的双方,谁最能保护其中的乘客
* g8 ?$ x" w' y; N" |+ r+ Y1 w+ @" k: \$ B
好多人比较的时候,都是想当然地比较正面碰撞的情况,其实,交通事故,又有多少是正面碰撞的?大部分时候,司 ...
; K: x( J% }9 I b3 FCrisis 发表于 2010-3-2 20:25  0 w) d; y) ?' \0 x6 c8 h
5 J2 H+ M4 z8 d& l
看过一篇文章分析大小车的安全性的,里头也是提到实际交通事故的撞击方式,在所有致命事故里,50%涉及非两车撞击(翻车,撞击障物,比如树,水泥柱子),这类事故里跟安全相关的因素车子重量大小不算其中,主要是
$ G6 g* d1 u7 n i* Z6 ~% ba) an effective restraint system (seat belts and airbags)' t; i% e( }+ I
b) effective energy absorption in the crush areas (front end or rear end)( ?% }4 @# T! a2 l6 i, O
c) a strong cabin area that does not collapse in the crash
. C, a' b b% I8 Z" z5 Y! }None of these items are automatically better in large and heavy vehicles. In fact, for item c, the roof of a heavier vehicle is more likely to be crushed in a roll-over accident than a lighter vehicle. This is one reason why rollovers in SUV's cause a higher percentage of deaths than in cars (in addition to their higher center of gravity.)
2 }% B! \. K, b b4 ^$ w" |, [6 @8 a9 M
- c: `. T! f- N' [9 L1 D) J- [* }
0 \. ]3 n+ F" f: D8 b( o3 L而在涉及两车相撞的另50%致命事故里,70%是侧撞和追尾,这里a和c是主要安全因素,车子质量仍然无关。下面的图表反应了这类碰撞时不同品牌车子的安全状况
1 b" o* c. {6 f4 L) L9 [, [+ Q" K `Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) are shown below. (see http://www.iihs.org/ratings.)! h3 E. C1 z% n2 ~- [* {, ~8 S
" H6 \4 ]; \0 b! L+ s1 @: W2 ^! w8 x e( F1 n; I4 z/ D/ K) E
外行看热闹的人飘过,楼上的各学科专家,各地农民请继续讨论。 |
|