 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑
0 K {0 X. p3 m9 ^还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?% i [- T3 F& _8 O# l- I+ m
0 {- L Z- z" w% A. P% B" s这明摆着是两码事( C( ~' ?1 r/ l3 T
sweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03  , \9 o4 [; z1 u% _9 l
2 J" ]6 e- |# T& Q- g7 q
can't type chinese at work,
+ U5 w) A" A! R
+ [4 h5 |# k, v' F( L g$ @2 ^% n"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.
% X* U. ? [2 `' b* e/ r& u, [9 D5 I5 x) ?1 J; f+ i) i6 d
What's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|