I don't care if 政治板 need an extra 版主 or not..That is between you and 十字..I never request an extra 版主 for 政治板. So I have no idea why you ask me instead. 3 L" J3 W" e8 O6 W; gleohu 发表于 2011-11-3 12:50
还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?0 r3 a3 s y% x8 E& J1 _% |/ ?
' }+ c' {, d' E* i
这明摆着是两码事 % W0 G h/ Q" zsweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03
5 _9 T+ J" ?2 O) j7 ?; D) n% M- U9 h5 G! h H4 e( W
can't type chinese at work, 5 f" r# i0 A a $ o7 t- [; z4 p: y5 E( H: B) x"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me. + \/ I& K2 K4 t 4 c+ t0 x/ u. g4 g9 nWhat's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time.
can't type chinese at work, . C& k- I( t; V 7 i0 f9 E; w/ d3 x: S- i"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me. ; A5 r$ H, P$ E0 J , t( w4 s- F8 X& dWhat's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious. ... $ |" W" @( }1 X- ?leohu 发表于 2011-11-3 13:15
" J4 [/ ^8 ~2 o9 i' W5 r
我就不明白了,明显在哪里?6 n3 ~: |% s K: p
) X; n, ~6 c2 ^8 p9 Y
谢谢骚客的答复。 8 `7 G* T X" h7 f. X7 V( p这个答复,多少让我感到有些失望。5 V* q/ a, b: j1 n. T
《时事政治》对骚客的邀请不会因此而停止,《时事政治》对骚客出任版主一向虚位以待。- e' ~' X: l: u
请骚客再三考虑,从长计议,即使你现在主意已决,希望将来有一天,你会回心转意。