 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑 # R; S* |; t$ e$ N3 `
还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?
, u: k8 Q. A% u) e0 I- ^, g, s
) M2 _1 t3 j& a8 a' k( }( K' ?这明摆着是两码事; k( p/ D% w: @% x* `: b
sweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03 
2 `, S K# y! g- g5 F5 B
9 v" z& w" _7 M$ R& z0 m& r& Dcan't type chinese at work,
$ I/ x( `6 H/ G3 j$ V3 ^# Y R# N. B) w
"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.
+ J2 G# W5 Q" M% V+ x% W% v% i! |4 L( }' d; X
What's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|