 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑 3 X% P4 h& L, `1 v3 y9 ?
还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?
& u2 {, \6 _% @: z. F# h! j: p& x2 N' B7 W- A' G
这明摆着是两码事+ R: @3 i6 ~3 g' U5 L4 z; S+ O' S
sweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03 
% N. i7 i7 O7 c$ l+ }9 v6 t# b* ?7 { R4 W2 g4 O1 }, }5 d8 T
can't type chinese at work,
+ N7 S/ ^1 u% {' P# f9 ]) `9 h0 s
: j' `9 Y, U! A0 Q* c/ ]"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.# a$ I) A$ R) v( W# I* d% w0 N: b
! ~& ]7 N ]$ `; }+ T6 r
What's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|