I don't care if 政治板 need an extra 版主 or not..That is between you and 十字..I never request an extra 版主 for 政治板. So I have no idea why you ask me instead. 1 @4 W, w1 v9 n$ y, a6 f$ Y) }3 }leohu 发表于 2011-11-3 12:50
还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的? " ~9 l2 j' o% X% G3 X 7 ]0 j& k: s I$ k这明摆着是两码事 r8 w8 W7 t. J& Y7 c( ^. Gsweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03
5 U: f6 }1 L8 L7 t/ g* N8 m3 n* ^
can't type chinese at work,& M6 e1 t* |4 i% `
7 M$ @! G* t. q* D
"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.3 A" o& p' n% t4 N' U- @1 K
J5 t! q w" x4 GWhat's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time.
can't type chinese at work, , D! T4 @% s8 Z. d+ C) U- N8 `( `- f$ e: i K/ j
"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me. % q+ E4 L7 H# ?, ^7 q- V. j 9 s( X- V1 q/ _) ?7 m' nWhat's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious. ... 3 ^/ W1 u9 D3 S2 a8 q! wleohu 发表于 2011-11-3 13:15
& K5 M6 ^/ a' a% D& S我就不明白了,明显在哪里?- E6 r2 U8 p* N
% ?" D4 |! c! Y1 y
你之所以觉得明显,是因为你觉得时事政治需要一个大量发表政治言论的版主,而我任为不需要,所以从一开始我们的基本点就是不同的 8 R8 A7 o8 C5 N Y; ~1 n$ B ) H* J# _9 t6 V7 O* k* \9 h3 l没有人在这里觉得谁比谁更聪明,你当然可以想当然的认为你认为的东西是明显的,这是十字所谓的自由嘛
% A" g$ M7 d' s. p! ^+ \为啥要是"版主“呢? + Y4 L' y2 {& ~* ~# i, t, g3 {. A6 C: ^1 O. D8 C
为啥一定要”版主“来负责政治观点的平衡呢? 9 d. l u1 Y- j$ l' K& T2 w- Q Q8 R
版主和普通版友在发言的分量上有什么区别呢?还是你觉得版主有特别呢?
谢谢邀请,但非常对不起,因为太忙,就不参与了。 7 Y% A: l" e$ T$ @* I7 A* D6 T1 d" B1 C, a( _) W
再说,我没少在那里发帖。这已经是在枫亭之外发帖最多的地方了。 ' Y* q; Q, O! Y3 q, h+ S z" |7 I# g5 C- P! C) h- r
再再说,你知道自己太偏右,稍微偏中一点点就行了嘛1 n- V H% w: o& o8 d8 f' t8 Z
3 L+ h. T# c; Y" F
再再再说,你们几个干的不错,继续努力就OK了: h, y! o+ Q) e E# n/ E