I don't care if 政治板 need an extra 版主 or not..That is between you and 十字..I never request an extra 版主 for 政治板. So I have no idea why you ask me instead.' |( a/ G' [ N5 S. o
leohu 发表于 2011-11-3 12:50
# p1 Y) a4 j' e" |' e" b7 ^) H* X& g- l0 b \% m
can't type chinese at work, 3 F# A# x6 _- _/ z i ' @. @ M5 i7 q" |"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me. $ h3 z7 [9 u- R7 @; d! M . O m- a- `2 S, T2 `; W1 vWhat's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time.
can't type chinese at work,$ a% T4 q6 c3 j
- z8 T0 J& ?8 ]! G; c8 |
"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me. $ w" B; }, |4 t, q; c1 o; z* g7 s( ?( A
What's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious. ... 8 h0 O8 C0 l7 \& v5 f' Yleohu 发表于 2011-11-3 13:15
( K3 O6 x R: i" S我就不明白了,明显在哪里? 1 T1 j* @$ f$ [6 v& J5 t$ J6 G3 p; l
你之所以觉得明显,是因为你觉得时事政治需要一个大量发表政治言论的版主,而我任为不需要,所以从一开始我们的基本点就是不同的+ M" B# \3 ^2 [6 c- a8 E
3 }0 b- g2 S$ v3 w7 L
没有人在这里觉得谁比谁更聪明,你当然可以想当然的认为你认为的东西是明显的,这是十字所谓的自由嘛