1 2 3 4 5 " d8 t: _/ [' U2 C! \; j. N4 n) z! v48 51 0 0 1, Z0 i5 \5 }6 y4 p4 F2 y
" [: ~% D4 G) [7 ~% k
If #1 dead, #2 can get 50, that is the biggest number he can get. so give him 51 ( If #1 gives him only 50, what if #2 hates #1? then he can still get 50, but #1 is dead. )9 e# K' {" l' A) K" e" q
#5 very likly will get nothing. so give him 1 he would be happy. 7 B% s0 R: `3 @0 X#1 gets the rest of the 48.
' k+ _! I8 k& j g% P6 e
OK, If I am the #2, I would not agree that, remember, if #1 dies, #2 and #2 each get 50, then that is half agreed, right? then #2 gets 50.
Originally posted by 人生无解 at 2005-10-1 10:54: ' h c3 H: w+ f* j, S6 E3 [1 2 3 4 5, g3 @, y$ n: I$ C" I4 E3 w4 J# x
48 51 0 0 1# E6 |$ [) x+ H2 R
O/ K0 l5 E5 f+ ~- \8 R
If #1 dead, #2 can get 50, that is the biggest number he can get. so give him 51 ( If #1 gives him only 50, what if #2 hates #1? then he ...
# J% z$ D+ g) |0 U { o9 V W* T) h* U! t
2 a* b0 D1 P9 I6 `8 @, W/ @5 zor maybe I am wrong, what if #1 devide it to be 98 0 0 1 1??