Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
. e4 _1 q) ?' U$ c% v2 I0 ]0 I
; u9 G/ I! ~. z. OLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
) F3 m' D" [% X! R. T
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:

' F8 t$ f' u) C( B6 y" k* M+ K/ _
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

4 W6 A1 a4 A, D8 D" kSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
2 k/ N: }1 b* B5 Y6 TSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
6 L. o. p0 Q# w6 I6 I
: o4 ~( l3 U+ G& ^( [0 e& {+ uIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

5 k/ J8 z# R  h- v3 y; Q) J! z Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
/ E# C( v: H5 _6 x* y! s0 P, DBoston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
0 R# w0 I  Q7 \1 w7 S0 o' y; |San Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
8 Z8 p4 k  P! y; k0 [9 l1 sNew York  21.2 22.5
: ~3 `. Y& Q/ @Chicago  17.2 20.8
; M" o  F3 c9 q! R# p& l! @Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4

. T5 Q  r5 X) }+ ^

It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.

6 ^5 C4 I% s% X4 L
7 a, o4 k( I1 K' x$ K' j' u# MFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

' C; y4 x4 I$ U$ x6 iit would be a good reference.

! q! d4 ?: R9 Nthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

& {! V9 q, F9 H) D8 L[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]