Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
7 E- s  e3 X$ x* r3 R- E) P$ rLeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
4 l/ n7 P2 P; b( M' ]/ x
! }$ w8 z. l1 t, V. Z+ rNot everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
6 p& K3 x; d7 y' G( N, K
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:


In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

9 V6 K* ]' O+ c( Z8 mSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
- j+ m$ W. r. BSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
. x9 F: {  D" V) ?+ {# ~
$ F& H1 v  D2 A5 `7 J* x, ]3 b" pIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

  c# M: R$ l1 U- @. tIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

6 V. B( o; h3 K5 O Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
. |6 A1 p; m1 r Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
) ]* y1 e" h; Z/ ~Seattle  20.4 25
4 W, @+ W/ o9 ^( m& P8 k0 H% HDenver  17.7 23.7
0 S9 Y. Q( @! @8 Q- UNew York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
% `. o  V7 Q/ x9 K! mWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
& ^9 P) _' c3 }# Q) b* \
" k& d9 h' ^# \9 c7 z1 _

It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
0 n0 A& N# t" U) d9 G5 w, B8 n' w

% u! ^8 @* g7 k( `; l. ~4 t2 ?9 kFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

8 G+ ?2 q1 Z8 U2 Y/ qit would be a good reference.

thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
7 O" |9 A+ [3 g* H
1 d3 Z7 E7 E5 {$ C[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]