Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
8 H: k- C+ p( Y  D* Q/ z
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
3 y) _) h. R: k; y/ o
Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
" ]! F& _, Y: j& D% u1 L: p, q- ?
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:

- p+ ]: b, S  e$ k
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

9 h" }$ [2 D' L  c" U  _. R( GSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
6 J2 f) S  C8 F# a6 R: wSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
  y  K9 v  l' M" a( t4 l8 GNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
% }4 _- X& H$ j2 \! RYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

( V5 s5 B  k" j5 A% m1 k; @- xIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
5 E: ?3 D2 \$ K. x: @6 [7 {
% m* M% R& R" u& W# QIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
8 V8 H- [; D- I9 \8 Q: o
( E. q' Z- y2 W3 Q! Q5 g( N, ]/ Y Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
4 a, U8 G: @* @+ p* e( H Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
% x1 m, X4 s; E2 m8 a* k% h9 jSan Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
5 r5 Q8 h7 N4 t; OLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
& N4 W8 Z- c& {2 lSeattle  20.4 25
4 o3 D) H( r$ Q9 ~7 qDenver  17.7 23.7
, m5 @" }+ }' R8 O: R. SNew York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
3 G& A+ M- Z0 Y' D+ a+ S
% i4 M' w9 Q3 f' J& e8 i& ~  G2 @$ d
" P( n2 x# [7 k% }  V3 P& w0 d: {1 E
  ^4 f; Y! i$ a% k6 P; ^It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.

+ x- Y8 _2 O: P% k: E! X
From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
0 E( i: V6 Q" Y$ p
it would be a good reference.
4 [6 |4 z4 i* X
thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

- O5 T% c5 S. t) F- t[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]