Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
! k! y$ L0 x4 zLeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
! f( R2 C# j" [# W+ P
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
" ?2 s7 \# l) M" Y& m) X6 g
) H; G+ I- O1 }  k5 j/ D4 c) j7 X9 `Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
, k3 r4 p7 n2 D( g) N, f
, N3 t4 `  O* X- fTo calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
4 |4 Q0 g$ b$ O' D" j4 }) W" S
/ W( L3 {# L- r9 C& w: Z4 T) K+ s4 c
" q+ |+ I$ i( k- PIn Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
7 Y; r0 W6 Y, Q* t+ Y2 i
$ E" R; ]" }4 O* ~8 f) ZSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

# G* u4 O; m) J# U3 t9 u3 hIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
. o; w4 f  i: Z# j
Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
- s5 _7 k/ F3 j5 ]% X5 ?4 ]San Diego  22.8 29.7
% _2 e/ b" }/ h/ K9 }San Francisco  23.8 27.2
1 E: d- n9 h& X- }Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
! [( ^( _  o* i8 j. b* U# GDenver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
2 l% e( b( b2 B3 T0 \Chicago  17.2 20.8
. l+ M  _8 p' L0 n, j0 jWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4

3 z2 A% \, v0 i* w0 m5 B
4 O' D6 e% S0 ~8 L* ^
It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
  P# }& h" {' E( w2 U

From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

+ w" }* j% l* V4 t* u# Kit would be a good reference.

thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
3 e5 B- f0 o0 _! A
) G. S9 B) D1 [[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]