 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
9 [5 d! l# J2 L5 p" f0 e
7 E. ?( \- O& T. R* _% S8 O" |1 y# J+ ]; d5 }
If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
* f, ]7 c# _' x8 a$ ~0 h( t9 |2 n: s/ C6 w/ K
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03/ X; T: w5 ?' ]4 @4 f( q6 G
1 U$ E2 i5 ~" }# @5 L
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..( n; S% s/ A! b Y& j7 r4 A2 J
, Y+ S7 Q* s; ? u' A
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) ' [2 E2 O, _9 X$ m5 S+ y5 [
|
|