 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑
* i5 q; K, ?- V+ v4 ~1 M9 D/ n0 \+ o9 j7 s" Z; h
$ \& R' Y! F/ ]- _, t
你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:5 h! ?+ A) u: J& j* [$ ^, y4 m
Ralph Klein j: A1 W2 u- m a5 C
6 a9 }9 O k4 f) U% b7 C
我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!
. v- \& }4 ^+ \* v/ O" M
+ Y. X! t/ Y+ d' ]0 E所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。9 U a; m [. \1 p7 c9 z
) | h- @* L2 O, y- c: B/ B& p
; f" P% p" I2 ]$ T
! ^5 H- r4 V5 R8 h7 |5 W+ @http://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades
# U f B% d) r* tHistoric Alberta budget balances:' W {6 E& S+ s( D
2 V, z, ]' O" O- f+ C G
1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus
2 g& P$ R0 M; F' {9 Q) b0 u% e, P* ?8 k+ D
1982-83: $796 million deficit
& k. V; l8 J- ?; P2 I3 f6 W# J5 n* k
1983-84: $129 million surplus
- R8 b) ^5 z) f% e: m! A9 `+ b# k8 j0 C- |# U* J8 R. `5 P7 p
1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus8 t/ E+ u8 K' [" v2 x2 `
5 d$ O6 P3 N2 L% ]
1985-86: $761 million deficit
' a8 P7 r9 O+ L: K* A" _+ s% T+ e$ d% _8 S1 J
1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit
* p* ?1 V+ I0 W4 Z/ A9 _1 h# ~$ H: N" [$ M/ X$ M
1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit
' c* j) U( F- Z4 [ M
; K7 ^. ^$ [: |" _& e$ [. \' }1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit
4 h$ l2 y% Q. S4 P! a8 m7 F' w9 s) m6 E: k4 i% u3 Z
1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit
+ G9 ]4 n/ \- x( K O$ Z2 x" ~( ]( D3 B% N( [1 o* E
1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit s% ]; t) K% h; H; V1 P( P
% k' e0 H O) C1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit
Z! t5 N( a: T! L# J
# p1 C) M) \- P- r2 r1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit! A. {8 F5 X* T+ X. b
( {0 Y5 r4 x& d3 e% K. B1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit
9 S% `* j0 N- E, h9 J; i
w% N# `7 k! p1994-95: $938 million surplus+ L+ I9 g. D7 g y
0 V1 ~8 k. A. _2 Q# q) a
1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus
; c4 c8 [8 x4 N( L: |
; O. J$ B( {1 W8 @' p- B8 a" s1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus
+ ]# P' ]( Y( c5 h! y& w
/ t- u# U5 l+ U2 x% Y1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus
$ b* m" {4 l' B: n- o1 T' X5 }" x4 O6 ^6 S
1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus' N S; |& t+ l" ` O A% p7 G1 k
1 T) i% u& V4 P+ B
1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus
9 X7 |& u5 W& J. Y
' X0 V6 [1 A! ~" l, Y. J2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus
& z. d3 [* ~% ~9 {6 @ O. W
l5 Q7 R2 k, B3 e: D" F2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus
# T5 ^) @7 n- j( K6 \, V$ n) h7 \9 a8 `" r, o
2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus1 `7 b/ t B4 w3 S; v8 i
0 W+ r. M) r$ o/ K: m1 X# b
2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus+ @/ o2 L, Q% r/ o
# K) j& E/ W+ Z- C& b, [" B& X. N) Y
2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus' W. o. p0 S3 \8 S5 ~
: M4 {1 O" Y0 m. V# f) v% [
2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus0 c [: G; i+ {. b( _6 C }
* [ b$ P5 K4 n' P2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus
' N! i8 p5 I# m1 E! ]" B8 S
; b4 z( w% g: {) R9 G% k2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus
- ^) c$ y; o$ R7 u
* `# ~7 k3 j5 w: y2008-09: $852 million deficit
7 |* n" G* r$ \5 P: { v1 ~+ O, w8 c8 g: V5 I; s& u7 e* m
2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit
2 ~; a1 i$ g! v. v' A3 t3 r6 |( B4 Z3 h+ s
2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit6 H% z1 l$ A2 q$ ~* z s' E: M
% [2 U( l$ A7 c0 \" Z0 E2011-12: $23 million deficit( L# X- k t/ a4 f: L* W
. Z7 {# z# l; o2 u7 k2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit
/ S' J% \; j* N, {! s, Q. D7 R+ {3 l5 v* r. |5 R2 S; v
2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|