 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑 5 f8 ~# m$ M. y, S" `
$ \+ Y# t( e' Z, h4 n% u8 M
8 [4 ]% a' B9 _( `7 j& p/ ]你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:" G0 o% `% T5 E5 _
Ralph Klein8 r, A" \0 _% Y3 C2 j1 v" s3 e
; m9 B. J( o3 B; y
我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!
9 [ ^& j6 ^) N( ~
2 \2 b+ W; W J7 B0 @所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。0 t5 m: I" ?* \$ ?# D5 N
* j. F. H: ]) i1 ]2 Y' L. b/ B
! z. h- ^& K2 ^) d
/ B; l3 @. K5 k& [* Hhttp://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades
- s+ P' B% X2 g' x, m( c! b$ Z! BHistoric Alberta budget balances:
4 j( v: o& r3 V. |4 N' ^& a' t. A+ `9 ?# v- O m) N5 f7 x
1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus) B% l, q$ ~1 _" Y
. l z1 P2 ]1 q* J( `- ]/ N
1982-83: $796 million deficit
0 E7 t( n# ]! K7 c- g, q3 p9 Y* i0 f+ I4 y; J( z
1983-84: $129 million surplus
! V- H/ c" x" Y7 \" }& @
3 r5 O" z1 e; m4 D# {) m1 L1 Q1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus
3 X) q f' G2 v8 O& y7 u. g9 ? m
1985-86: $761 million deficit/ ?% t6 D1 n& k# P
; D0 A; x& g8 {* C; u3 p1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit
8 [1 S$ c4 w) l# f* Q7 ~
+ I3 ?" w- j" z1 C7 b6 d: f6 b! p1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit
( s) ?* D, a; C: R3 H: M3 C
0 q' E' A, q' R4 K4 y1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit
, B" Q0 ]9 b5 P# m
+ M9 G; ]6 {4 N9 E: }: v1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit* U" }. n& R! |+ q# d
# d( J3 L; C8 \8 e1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit
! G! F; X* p2 @ f9 h* R+ c3 v5 ]5 z" S
1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit) Y, T5 c9 I. A8 q) |
! c/ Y l( c6 L- X5 t, \1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit
6 S6 s( r7 q a$ d
$ W0 k( t9 W; i3 U, a" N1 t1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit
) F! a- O6 d( L5 a
$ w- _) f/ W; @( `; c1994-95: $938 million surplus
$ X+ x# S. @# e: z. U7 G
5 T2 n1 `. y" y' [1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus
3 p# l# A' g3 I# `8 W* m3 p+ i0 k5 J. J, V3 R3 J+ w
1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus
& a V" f1 q' S' F& I2 P/ H, a {. ]
# l; l& f' Q/ C( P# R- J' A2 \1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus
/ D: U$ x8 k/ y1 I* P ?4 ^9 b5 V# h( r" V
1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus
. Y) x X* k! J3 M& w% `6 K3 \* k" a" k
1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus! f1 J4 S( g$ t1 `
3 C. K5 ?3 W% d3 j, q
2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus
, ]2 T! V& Z; t5 ^- D
7 u( h3 f7 r5 ^: V2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus: R f7 A! i" S$ c4 q# p
- }7 {6 l6 V1 T' X a( d! y m+ E
2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus- V7 R' J, v( u, R2 _" U9 Q
$ Y4 o) P. J; F% n4 X* `5 q* d2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus1 x7 {- a: R, ~% [7 y
6 S* r K5 w7 J! V9 ~2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus
0 v' c9 z V. A+ j7 D8 d5 ~2 {( L: M3 M+ `3 L! }6 ]
2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus" e! x5 ]# E( j' }8 o4 O I
# s( O1 ^* g& a$ b n# x$ }
2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus! T/ t, I6 O5 ?2 z ?% C8 S( @1 q
* p6 }9 j$ f M& O5 R3 h2 s
2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus, ^4 P/ H i5 v5 ^' v( I& G7 L
( l, l/ f) Z" a: V2 \5 O: ?; Z5 C9 `
2008-09: $852 million deficit
. A/ f8 t1 M7 x7 o Q% B$ M1 B$ U! Q+ O5 C
2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit
- `9 m+ d* P O
5 z: E( y4 ]- F }8 H7 b2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit; V H1 s1 E7 H0 W- b7 o
% A6 `& D7 d9 J" A4 ~
2011-12: $23 million deficit
) x2 f% ^ P+ R' T4 S+ Y& Z1 \: f( t S' H
2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit
6 `6 X' O! r1 L3 c* L6 \8 j8 {( t% n$ {' T2 ~3 z6 @: Y
2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|