埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2752|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable & R2 x% o( K2 C8 w

' l2 z1 p6 C  i2 @4 S- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -0 V4 T' D4 P# L/ N1 m- E3 A

! Y# a. r- l6 m! R    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market# S  R$ ]( |& x  A# [* ?* x
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third% F9 }# |1 E* g( {* z! A
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic+ B, n0 I+ |& a: X
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit% y! W- e- Z( b+ g" p
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
/ Y# `9 x1 Z3 j  z- o+ Nmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
! P) ?3 a2 Z$ o5 _Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal2 }- f3 s/ E( V
LePage Real Estate Services.. Z: e. N5 G+ g% C0 U/ v

# g  l( D' U8 h2 J! J1 P    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters/ o4 a; s' R+ R: y. X2 h/ g
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
8 `3 R* d. W% n, |conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
8 p6 b# i; Z' B6 j$ d3 |sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
# x# T: ?% O/ Dresidential real estate sector.$ f* y0 e0 \, U5 r$ g: C7 z

- T# U9 p) s9 }  y' [+ ^0 _    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation5 N1 t0 C" `; F1 k
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
' r7 B( F( t3 Zyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
9 B& P2 g5 }# g; n(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
+ u+ G) C: W0 l. ?3 n(+13.2%).& s- h" T) a. ?

4 ~* ~- a; S) V9 g    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
1 n/ J3 q/ b; g1 kduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
" m* s8 d/ K# e3 z& _  t; ffrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are8 O) T: x4 s  N+ O& R
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
6 q! e; b4 h$ N$ N: ?$ Apresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
. j4 g6 A/ D5 k& p"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
* X! y' A1 Q+ h1 K, ewelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy2 c+ A3 E7 H+ E' a8 C
balanced market.", p% E4 ]7 [4 @
* ?' D* g+ A3 u. l# m0 Q
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
+ _: g9 M2 k5 F" }considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
$ S* k7 t  }+ n3 m) `$ hto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
. U" R, ^( I! b% |/ O1 f% j& Pthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
+ K# g# [0 l# q6 renergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
; ^% q6 [7 U( Q0 }3 _" V; Dmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
: N- J6 d; h: B7 M: Z; u. z: Z( d+ [2 i) Wbreaking price appreciations.
. S& X- x- I, J. ]4 L- l0 L. v' s, x* o3 J5 p
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding2 Q% l9 e$ L# x: i
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
( b  N" ]/ K7 w8 B. jlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
- \! x3 A8 p8 j/ C$ G/ ]! _6 k2 J3 [* J7 Z, W
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid/ o) n4 m. Z8 m- \. S! [
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
- `8 X9 U3 p! C) P- j0 a. y/ \) Nconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
2 |$ B  a7 a6 j) T9 pslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.# P* s+ K6 j. p. Y
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers; b, t) B% Y4 S" V4 D
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
1 S2 h8 w' @, jprice appreciation when compared with 2005./ [6 e" G$ u$ X) Y! F
0 b4 p+ `' L; L
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing. Z+ {1 T6 e( I
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
- g$ v+ r( ?7 g. D7 ~+ J4 Q( Tfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
- i% W# q3 I, D5 eare markedly different than those found in the United States.) k# {$ U  m7 u) f

% e! `1 F1 L4 d- U) z. Q. y    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the# Z% g: i2 I" C+ {0 f/ y! t4 L
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
6 ]* S6 q6 o7 a7 T' \7 t2 Y1 g: Z$ ^favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the0 @% s% C5 n! T+ R. d0 N
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
! l0 f/ L- R9 H8 qaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
1 I0 U3 ]! O1 h8 a! z! ddownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and3 p! y0 e. ^! |- d# l7 M& b
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization4 f9 H0 k& o! N& D* E2 f  n4 N
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
$ @' ?, U7 E/ ]" Q
0 p& Y* D6 i! [    <<
* o2 X5 o5 T. ?; w: [1 a4 @2 D                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
- F% j' J: e# [3 `) v/ F# N2 y" B( J    >>* e+ x: o( t3 @7 o0 Y

1 ~4 z* E& p6 x7 t$ F  X3 r! z" V( t    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
& p5 ~4 @" |' V, u2 U6 X3 NHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate' H( s3 s& @9 A2 ~( l$ Q6 w
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
3 _( V# X6 F& `3 Olooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of& k0 S$ _$ w/ M5 U
renovations.
0 N2 e/ d/ }; k5 @# s% C8 ^5 A) E+ }2 C
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
( E6 m* ?- t! y) v& {5 P; kincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
; P! p9 T" r1 ?: b9 t! Vcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
% P7 X. x# y1 s7 lSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.  @0 U( n3 @! }/ {

( P9 O& C% H/ d" F    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer0 t/ i* l0 H4 z9 D
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the7 V0 W* v+ b4 t( N/ ~
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new. s% s& ?$ h' G( F
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores) l* X+ h% I% l. h
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes/ |) Z7 ?7 I. k3 S
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.9 `$ Q2 k+ C! R8 H7 ]5 R

; [, C7 Y5 U. {" R    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced' s' |" U% D1 D. A  S
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their- w" C% \% h1 m- R3 q
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers  J2 q- c0 K: e
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
% H: I! W# m% zdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing* T  s( X% w" q6 S
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
# z7 ^' f2 v* A& u! p5 T8 I
7 _& F# M! z7 V    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
5 p9 g' V. T: hamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
% N* g9 q  \2 {7 p2 i+ e! fpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005," }( R! O. D5 `6 ?# o3 d) B! a
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last% A# t7 U' R3 f" p8 {! x# z
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.! K& Y3 ^3 K9 P; V

% u7 C. `& H1 I6 B2 Z    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
" K; |$ A' I9 u3 c7 ?  m, k8 Uprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory7 K! L( S# y8 N& ^% w5 d
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting/ z1 f0 J4 t% T2 ~4 `
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,% v: p6 I; E9 o% u7 L  }' b6 G
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
6 M( Y. E% y% @* I5 x, W6 mpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
( O$ Q: n" z. R' C! cmaking a purchase.4 C4 M( k  l9 E

! n5 Y7 U6 v( v6 c) f1 ~    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing/ ^6 t/ `0 q! a
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
* y4 S6 V+ X2 ?. C' z; v# \9 Vconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city6 d& {* z! ^8 [6 y3 ]1 A2 s
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting# w' k# X' S% k: O/ V  k4 e! t
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
* }, A! \& B! V# ramenities.
! e- h! Q  v7 x2 s
+ U; v2 D( [# U9 P& o0 p    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels3 _* X& Z1 e4 C$ i. `' |4 k
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand8 A! m& t: K' A# J. P, x
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has: w; [# j% I, O
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
! J  V3 {5 A* a' I5 G; U: udriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle- b5 ?5 v5 |# @  z# P
residence, rather than for investment.
% V( y" H. D) q/ H% R, j
& r0 o% y" }4 O/ l& u    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
$ ]$ p! J7 M/ x- p& k$ ]: N0 Shouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
( ?" G7 T$ b7 w& S# qin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
" z5 V, W' }8 j% Q* Z  ~confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
7 w9 N$ ^- Z0 \rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
& W! c; d! {( W( @# W' G( b; Othe market.4 V& j+ G/ |+ m# _7 c, A$ i

9 }8 R& |; b* K3 ]    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
; U0 H0 B# R. W3 P6 N8 eJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
. f0 \2 g* u$ K5 V4 ~5 gAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
. X- r  P8 h9 C. Emonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
3 h  l- `4 U$ O) `to the shortage of available inventory.) L2 r- D2 K5 \* f( m. `/ K- k- E$ l
/ R4 z' _! n9 M' D1 K$ t
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its6 I( G6 Q% a8 \. d( H
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains& D7 q4 Q5 @5 n; Y- c
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
  c$ B! P/ X: N5 G% y/ Nstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.0 k% I: R* F' \( S; c
8 p4 V2 i' x$ B( f6 \% D, Q
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases# ?" ?5 e1 r' v8 ?9 o
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low0 V* e  u! d: [! \
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
* @5 {1 S: d4 o+ w# p& k8 m( wpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring9 W% @, K/ T3 N5 F; O. o! b4 ^
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
8 d8 @4 {0 ~; L' N( R- N9 fseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as5 i" a. Q1 B+ O, }
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

, W; E' e$ s6 H: u/ J+ u8 D1 ^/ W7 M# }' I
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter: N' C1 ~! M* ^% X- D
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
: K/ s# J& f' z4 M( N7 nremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
* G, J. o& W# B1 P$ nmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
! p" V1 I) ~' Bincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
3 z  @) \  J; G& m. Yin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
+ `1 @" g; ^" N& p4 Y( ?) Q0 o2 Ctowards the end of 2006.
    7 q  }- @- Y6 [/ }6 F, H8 P

7 A) h! g" [( i0 ~) Z0 FWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
( H# U* B4 ]" N0 N# m2 rinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable0 @' H0 J( r+ U. R  v
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse- t* F: Z/ b; u& L- P
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
, q4 t6 x4 T% N0 P' X/ fforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added$ Q- x, z/ E4 H$ V% Z& `
pressure on tight inventory levels.
0 [9 {+ p8 [- b9 A; X
8 @6 c7 F0 S* ~+ v" g: X. @    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic2 U! u: j* h  [  e  @/ W, @6 s
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
$ s0 K' ]% _1 k6 A& sinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;( _1 I( e1 s# k3 S1 k
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching0 d" N* d- S! P# G
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
  ^6 C8 z/ T2 |$ u5 S# j7 S: }8 s/ ~/ b# T5 j8 `3 v
    <<
! D1 T+ _6 \7 K  W; f      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
: a) r" ~* H. n2 r6 S5 R
. B! D9 Q5 Z6 {/ {) \    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( u* D0 m. q" L) Y
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey2 |8 J$ |7 b2 l3 n0 z! V9 w
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  `' L- I- A; Z" F. W2 L                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3' s8 x& o* _7 p6 s
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average' U% ?5 d3 p: Q0 F+ m7 A6 u
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 o& Y- R) i/ J$ _2 N+ @
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
9 t( n2 }# v+ h) c& j$ x- K! U    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 f7 g5 X2 t/ c8 O
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
# }0 p0 o5 \# q  t0 O) V    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 {/ P; |! d* F    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
8 m; u2 V& A4 B- v+ S/ w3 r$ b    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 l' X, ~6 \. A0 c6 y: H# v0 D" |    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
4 x4 H; W- L: a5 S  L" Z4 t3 C    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- S! u! I( h6 w: D- }7 N( V    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333& l  H  @# ^3 i8 r% q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 K# a) F9 n  P7 L& a    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
$ S8 n) b# D8 H& c5 M    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: y+ e, e* }% k& [    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
( D  u5 e! K" h+ O) h" X    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  U. f( i8 w" @1 X9 A9 r
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,2505 ~: C5 o! K, I
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 @& x7 \% |) y3 r    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,7662 ^$ u# C6 \5 [7 x+ P7 C6 W
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' K9 N; T) G0 Z* {9 ~0 @$ V    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707/ {: _2 F3 E9 `+ F4 Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 t7 J6 ]' g# x4 N    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500  T8 ?) J( w9 q1 d* {4 G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! I5 d: a( @9 Z$ k    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
* j& a  w  m! k7 P5 O+ i( v    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* Y) G  @$ w/ ~1 i& F/ F
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,7142 T' V+ @3 h4 {/ s3 r
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# `- j& U. E# k! v# R. ^8 ^    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500! O; k9 X5 k+ g0 H* R1 U$ [
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 a+ b: K' E$ b( N: x  X    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,0000 e2 y" Q6 g% d$ H4 q  G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 B0 E8 j/ Z4 R( M8 O' r+ X) o    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,8605 x9 j- L4 d* y5 e+ y2 l
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  L( d& _, n, J9 h! s
/ [8 H1 l, O; ~+ y& s    -------------------------------------------------------------
; i8 i+ k/ }7 |1 |                               Standard Condominium8 D. U# }4 `$ t( ^* V0 j" @5 u
    -------------------------------------------------------------  d7 l, C9 V. R0 E. E$ y6 d
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
3 I9 J# [! E% d( B* y- S6 W    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
1 N  T( y; Z5 N! ~# r) S& m    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 n- ?' @3 o0 Z( S8 _! H- W4 W    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%' w& Y* l! r$ o, O
    -------------------------------------------------------------4 k( p+ E+ K! @5 o# z4 v
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
  A7 O7 ?& g9 S& `- s2 d    -------------------------------------------------------------
: W" i4 ?5 `7 y) W- F    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A/ A( C: m" Z( Q+ s1 p# I
    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 P* f& ?3 c5 n- N( Y, I    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A5 [1 _% D0 Q/ H& c; o  ~8 q
    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ e. w! B+ ~) j0 `. q! E+ I" V    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
4 c' L, k" U0 A. s" H0 _    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 f( c6 w6 l3 ?" v    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
( E# j% ?5 z1 c" t- \    -------------------------------------------------------------8 Z6 x% I, b5 z/ B1 c6 }" w
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%3 _: K7 |/ \# m2 O  L4 A
    -------------------------------------------------------------
& q- C7 W, m% }( a8 ]7 w    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%. J* S* m1 T0 I8 B8 n' N* [; r
    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 ?5 |5 v3 f  d3 b+ y    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%. d; F$ ]& L5 z, C
    -------------------------------------------------------------7 L5 C( C% H3 q/ e, n( O
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
' ?! M& u# C/ o( c0 C, e% j    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ a' _' E7 X0 W    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
( x. R  \4 ~2 |    -------------------------------------------------------------
( m& j& q9 I& ?* |: O; ]    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
- p% h  i- r" G% ~& [* B    -------------------------------------------------------------7 s( ~  ^, d9 B& Y
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%9 [4 M; B2 _' W3 e: e
    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 j' [' ^1 T. m1 v* [% ]    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%( O% K9 q4 F7 f
    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 {: P/ T  d8 B# H2 r1 G    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%, _. I- B# R% p) \7 {% z
    -------------------------------------------------------------1 o1 q( y6 V/ m
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
  h' @3 K) X: g1 ~$ A$ Y* r    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ m6 x1 u) Z9 W9 k7 o$ _" p' z9 p    >>
7 h  }( Q) O/ J3 B! t* _
8 k' A* r% N2 e0 V* y    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined$ p- h" w  g. c* ^* P
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint0 n( A4 N  W0 m$ h% d# z: y4 E
John and Victoria.
3 I- _( Y. S& x: G, o
) N, U4 i' T9 V, e8 q    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
" c, u# [7 E5 j, E# pcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
' y  R7 s7 f: [, w8 j% }" Vhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
3 H, U4 M% ^$ breferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price4 T  D0 r( @  `
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
/ j5 j0 o1 E: K( q" G+ J! C0 K1 Tacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
. h1 _6 \% N4 javailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current$ B: _, w4 u- r! n
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable, d6 F- M, y9 y% G1 c: i* L/ b, c
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
, o0 X9 n" y) W" UNovember 15, 2006.
& U1 h9 z; I  M9 ?& @' I$ L; I    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
0 Y. x7 A2 Y7 n7 P+ x( xfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge( G1 D' d: z" n
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is% b0 n6 G6 v+ h! d) K7 p
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-10-6 20:18 , Processed in 1.284127 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表