埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2285|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 5 _* R9 M: H' ]0 A% S4 F# y
) W; J0 s) l, w; x; W8 x2 N
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -1 i9 y+ T. h1 {8 _
1 M0 d1 n2 V( C" M
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
0 X' m8 s1 u4 F. sexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
0 J$ G7 l* R) W3 Z( ?quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic/ K/ `* S% K1 @6 Q: o4 l
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit# u( l) ~2 n! w9 N0 r( n$ ]1 F" s
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
- q) H- I# r2 y8 Fmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
) o# @+ U- `1 v6 h! E7 P: D, jQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
+ Z  {0 M) A- s& W# F; `LePage Real Estate Services.
$ i. ~7 ^( j( n4 Z; d. }3 y+ m( ~+ ]; ?1 T9 w6 E; v
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters( W! Z! X& J1 J' @; r" j+ j
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
; d; R; z: S! B4 Pconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
$ q0 W. l' k2 x: H7 Csound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the3 f/ N, M4 V% @5 \, f. |
residential real estate sector.! m8 x" Y1 @+ ?) ?% b6 n

+ O7 [1 `$ k& b    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation6 E4 B1 Y( G5 k) w9 ~0 [1 |1 N
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)4 h& K; y- t/ }2 O
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562  S9 M; O1 a# O2 _
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380$ z; I; u# a- V0 `# n! c) l/ i2 D1 X
(+13.2%).7 S  g- w! a* x% S- \# ^

% d$ E" G" h- R, r) l  U* f    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth. |0 N* F( [/ @) ^
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the( [0 U2 \5 o" h
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
3 p6 @1 N- P2 i" G! _  zpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,, n* T# o7 j! ?7 }/ Q  j. ^
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.+ M8 c: b' s3 H% B$ a
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We& ]& u+ F0 c: u0 T7 l$ X6 R
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy9 s. F( C& z/ p* F: A$ c
balanced market."
8 \# ?4 H* L: R8 x. W4 l3 ^1 d" @. j
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,  u% z7 d& a1 P$ I* c" p
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift) d' C' L4 a! I
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
0 B: Z( C6 v% @% Ithroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
4 B0 A  `, s3 m+ Fenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,3 R& L0 h1 ^  T. [* w
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record$ i. l; N5 |! w" w+ x5 d
breaking price appreciations.# T% Q5 l/ @- `$ W& I& r" K" r

8 G7 ~% R6 U5 ~0 h- U0 d8 ]7 K    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding; B. L: d3 |: I0 S4 \4 c7 @0 L: ]
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
& n* [( B* x% }- m" P& glargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
9 t) T/ K. V  m5 ~6 G
/ V9 i" E# T3 E5 |# p( D    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid) C6 p4 A' i8 f6 f" w, c  |
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
# ?/ m0 @6 d8 y8 xconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off, w$ E8 F* b& K, J! p  d9 m
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
, }; V; v' d8 ], `3 M$ T6 e& kIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers' Z" }4 R0 n$ m
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
" M- Q- \' L# ^- z7 u- u4 z& p/ wprice appreciation when compared with 2005.: k  o& D! @! |! k

. L! _$ x& \6 d( m    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
3 X6 n/ W* ]/ c4 r: a) }market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
9 Q3 u2 d" s& r$ u, I2 C' Sfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada/ s7 N, C& s4 q
are markedly different than those found in the United States.6 G  {- S4 q( e( P) o+ |

1 v3 M: e( [2 y& p4 }+ x& p    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
3 X/ A# i6 G( @$ }0 x$ ]4 G2 ^American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
3 ]% ?4 M8 M( m. Y9 c+ a6 ?! \. ofavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the6 s6 K( M) }& M& j
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
' l5 K' F0 m& S  g$ [affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the) k7 y0 O7 O# R7 N6 P* X
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
+ N; f( Q3 e! ^4 ]  c" \, zaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization6 J9 i/ @: [% j
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."! O3 T( v( e+ w

! B- e4 k" ~; |3 P1 q4 V    <<' P2 O6 \3 F$ V% Q3 n5 S
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES  D! w! B! k( U: _5 p, t! W. N
    >>
8 w) o3 ]  e/ L9 A% h
6 L4 R% B2 |/ d! r5 j9 F" l0 w3 A; E/ u( X    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in- z( n1 @$ X  H; b& y( p/ X
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
% Z4 b. b$ S" V& u. v. O5 c, pof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
3 y! {5 R( H4 K; O( ~looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of# ^0 Q. h5 W3 H7 m" I3 J
renovations.
: W- P. v% A  g4 l
5 h8 Q- u2 q4 C5 ?    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight; F6 U6 n4 i& Y) i, S  {
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation9 z* {6 j  |8 A! H. m) P: R% y! P' V
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
- o  A* S4 D! G3 @( V0 ^September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.1 g0 O4 H+ i& F4 @( F$ H/ D

1 s( E3 D5 X* c1 W& A    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
* u2 c5 ~' d. D; mslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
6 t, W; C+ G4 }  }8 _7 tquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
" E5 I" s" G' ?5 ^# d600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
8 d% ?: N, K8 Q+ m1 b5 l# t4 uto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
/ G- g/ p' d$ X9 |% a% p! land are instead opting for more affordable housing options.! M+ q. h1 i" H8 v* t

) e# S6 J5 x9 m- u2 b. N- ]    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced- k* ^% f) u: i& d, \3 A5 K  C
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
& B+ c7 x' q+ E( H& A6 D% ]homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
6 V2 @" \  q; U( v" fwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
+ w8 s  k. K7 U  g, l1 ?dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing0 D' s1 t/ L; y% Q! H
buyers with more options when looking for a home.5 u9 H3 c: s# f3 b5 Q2 q  o* f9 H
, l* A% g! n3 h* ?
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly3 s- b  k5 X2 n: M6 T. I% i
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes  [0 v& ~' Z) T, _/ b  H
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005," O  {1 x5 h" f& ]5 V2 G0 E
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last% Y: Y% }7 z8 K7 ^; }. p8 `
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
; w- U. h( E5 s  H! v# n9 m6 i5 M" {( O7 g" L, x5 g
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
4 w; Q" a% k/ O$ B$ ^: U6 }% h5 dprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
* N! z1 {2 Y- J5 c& T& Ylevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
+ s1 p: p7 D0 J# I# afirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
+ K2 ]1 ]3 i. l$ c% M* o& f3 gwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the! y/ O0 c$ e8 k5 a' L
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
" @- l: O5 F; s- t7 x; k( G# _making a purchase.  j9 X: I, M6 R5 Y: F- n6 ]

- v/ z- U8 a# z* s    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
6 R) D& F* q0 ^$ k8 W, Emarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
* j  P( {# |, ~3 Gconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city# o( s/ k) z4 ^. x4 L+ x, P
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
, ^7 v) [, M( Gattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown, D8 e6 U; Z2 V5 A+ X! H" Z# r+ l( D
amenities.
) A( S& E" E9 o6 U  s; H# d4 |  J1 j4 S# ~  E# h
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
( q/ b! i2 Z8 ?' E  B4 hthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand# a% d4 P6 M5 u, e! C2 }
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
% M( v: h" k/ u, Rcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
$ d' v5 e2 {4 B. ddriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
! d3 @7 o) `" N7 @1 bresidence, rather than for investment.. V1 B% |$ m' X1 n2 g. E

2 G, c) o3 f( ?# K- f    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
5 b5 I8 P* O1 f/ O, r- {house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
/ K9 B0 A8 S) ~0 ?4 Z4 ]- _0 [* b9 rin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer2 `7 k) V$ f& Q- W6 E
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization7 T. V  A0 u& n9 `
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter& T' R  |* Y- |6 v4 e$ S1 X) d
the market.
8 J' U/ f* M+ v: S- G! X- C
  ]; d0 }- M1 ~4 v; i% f3 h    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
3 Z  @5 x% |0 U8 |$ @July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In& G! q" E: G( [8 {
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
8 J1 W/ v4 f- ]% R+ i* ]5 y# ^months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
; F6 R4 R, ^- i* k- N. [to the shortage of available inventory.
5 j2 C4 G  r- C7 N+ a% N$ [+ Q( z# U
* l2 x* L* z5 H7 |2 m- h2 d    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its  P! a$ m  m" p
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains3 P! s; z* k& R! x3 Q
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
: a7 U) F: j" w1 Z; Istruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.7 m) x: m# z, \; ?, v3 m# E

: w% j/ K9 l& y- ?    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
5 r. v7 r( J3 B& i0 v" }in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low) X6 P' b# D6 m: L( F
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that; K2 m/ A) t. H9 C0 |
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring0 ?2 d" F5 p) Y7 r
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
4 j! q8 b( v. F& yseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as5 m3 n) Q0 W$ }5 R' A
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
1 i! V( c3 }- X

2 R( x) q" W9 o1 z3 U8 d; I    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
1 [8 t( Z& r+ fas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton% I# n' C+ X9 f. U/ }) i
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,' S* f) `& p/ y) f* s9 t+ m
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices9 j' [2 y# J+ h3 L5 _+ a/ D
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
- `! [8 a: n* V8 i( O& \in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
" h0 i/ w' m3 rtowards the end of 2006.
   
' b0 b8 b6 @3 @/ [* A, \9 w8 F1 }. j. X
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of2 |& R# \2 Y, Q% M
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
7 n5 b2 e8 x( X/ ]to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse( Z) V: m7 b: B/ ~2 N. F
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to' \- a; \8 A. ]( I
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added5 M4 _7 R2 P6 Q: ~
pressure on tight inventory levels.
: M0 M8 z: a- r; v9 n' M8 }
1 h" }) X  V' A3 ^- M    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic! T0 I& Y8 r# L. e3 r* E
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
& N% z5 h# H% I$ _into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;/ i6 ?9 \# Y0 L5 g3 C. [
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching# ]5 N, T( \1 U" _% P
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.: r+ w" s' g9 x

. @2 q7 J$ G* d    <<
! S6 v) Y$ k$ d8 i      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006. q  c7 |( @2 I2 q
: w! w9 f3 e( J9 E/ d! A
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% P  i% W# Z, W* x1 |# y! v                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey  r% p3 r. m5 t; P. _5 ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: }& I& N, o: d! w                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q32 c4 s, A4 o' u% K; F' e
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
# q; q8 _' \' j& n    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& V1 {/ e, L; m8 e' x/ |; D8 j
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
% H, ^. l+ V* m# O" X, b$ q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 R) A2 |8 f" \) h) L/ O7 Z0 k; i    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,0002 E6 @" f" A% e4 O
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 g- i% [! }) a1 I) Q; K) b
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,0008 f  N& t) g6 w% G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 `( ?8 y" k" S' ~' K, i
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
% J& y( y' K6 z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: i" H* c, v6 p$ J0 Q9 U9 w    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
8 v/ t5 H; o: W+ q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 ^% E2 A# q# M" I    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,5830 M' f" d. V# ~2 Q5 @% l) T
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# R; f% Y) \; C% e* }    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185+ _! {5 ^# H  v2 R" H2 O! L
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 E" z  k1 l& x
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
# @$ W4 @6 ]9 M' d1 Z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; O2 G: S0 u6 y) b
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
" @# Z+ K7 l) Q3 f    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. C7 K  p9 D: F; {    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
5 t; e) l/ w# D& z5 E+ x    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( Z7 U; u) L- ^) g- q
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500- F3 Z$ _4 g& }0 N
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  d' T; E9 R* g- N: |' X    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389+ d' B- j* a3 D
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------. z6 d8 \: D6 \( }' ]9 T( A
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714! m1 o" |, |/ Y6 A7 d
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 o. X$ Z3 f+ i9 T    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500; U! a: P1 p( q) o0 R. D
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& c% D& @9 |+ v! u5 B" \
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
# X! c0 J2 T  t+ T9 q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! l+ `5 b4 r  q) t
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
: |, z! ~0 G% J. h/ t1 w1 q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( D& d% Z& z) s$ g

. s% f" D3 O; M3 Y% s* w% U5 Q    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 \' f. L3 b1 d" h1 l) G. @9 V                               Standard Condominium
. G" E9 O6 _) l2 ^5 |! D    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 S% j; Y$ \3 }  \                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo" D1 B0 A3 S; n8 N
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change' n; R& I) L5 l; d
    -------------------------------------------------------------
, @- b5 a  p) B! }6 e9 q    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%- Q2 G* e5 {# W, c5 @& |# I6 [
    -------------------------------------------------------------
- H; `  D6 Z" i0 ?" ]  {    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%& I1 q3 J6 [( D4 A5 F6 `
    -------------------------------------------------------------
. R" s( A7 u0 I4 R+ ^" e    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
1 E2 p: ~5 {9 O8 V: R) r6 h3 {  O    -------------------------------------------------------------7 ~( \. P, I+ ^3 v
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
( x# U6 e% v$ N& u9 I- o* @' m    -------------------------------------------------------------
, {1 |( W- A# v# {  w6 _( K" z    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%! L; \  _1 g1 t' a5 q
    -------------------------------------------------------------
- d! w9 B& f* s    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
. c6 E$ b3 T4 A& C: I. P    -------------------------------------------------------------( Y( f% F. T) l2 b, h
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
* }& A) S2 n# E9 ?6 {+ v% k" p2 R    -------------------------------------------------------------: m9 h# S) C' m3 ~. q3 z
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
9 M. t, O9 G0 F2 P    -------------------------------------------------------------, B- X" o1 N5 [6 Y- t7 Q) M4 |; F
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%5 W, V% ~6 Y5 w
    -------------------------------------------------------------/ b, r0 t( P* C- ]/ w- H! _
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
$ N3 y2 m" l3 s! b! n/ x: Q    -------------------------------------------------------------
' A0 o( G5 `" l: W( m    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%% X( v# |5 S7 ], j: v; B# V
    -------------------------------------------------------------
) i# \$ k- k) a" C    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
- p# q! C& U4 s/ t- p8 T5 _    -------------------------------------------------------------; g1 b0 |6 t5 w: a, K+ t2 e
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%9 S( u; h4 I2 S: T  J" o5 a9 N: J
    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 W1 }9 o' g3 @; s7 J7 t    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
! c. V# V! @' N7 y9 F9 [: r- E    -------------------------------------------------------------* X8 `* j+ F2 F+ a( l! `$ w
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
( ~; Y/ l$ w" p7 Z: `/ w3 O0 ?8 {    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ z) L3 N2 k$ l+ h0 X    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%2 d8 @4 W6 b7 \9 A/ ^  c
    -------------------------------------------------------------, h9 j- Y  R; ?/ x
    >>, @" ?. Q: N3 Z+ E9 O+ o
3 x. I" U& q5 k9 B5 d
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
) k: L; q) x* E. \in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
; }4 o; p- {* s' h- d. ZJohn and Victoria.: u9 q8 R4 R  o1 C; r3 e7 X
" Q: S) w, T4 s! y
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most0 c) j; X; O* O) Y# r
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
! f/ v: E& C& H9 o9 c# xhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release3 L1 G' _' m7 c7 B
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
0 ?9 ]; Y" E$ {4 P  o. Itrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
" p, k/ R# @( ^6 R8 jacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
3 ]9 h: E, c4 l& mavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
9 v( M. q+ \- Kfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable/ E; W4 g9 Z9 m5 s
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on/ I# n7 ]) m% k" S- H/ m
November 15, 2006.6 d2 |( e9 q. b9 x  T
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of" D, G, d& X& F5 |2 F
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
0 l8 w+ a/ F/ z2 a! eprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is3 Z, y  v8 c. m( G2 [
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
理袁律师事务所
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-3-27 06:10 , Processed in 0.350613 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表