 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
$ A3 `9 X) g7 _4 r4 V
8 F! s" N1 H" \9 d5 Z- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
9 v3 E" d9 M4 ?% q) l, g. H7 W0 A3 V0 r: E# g& U
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
! T) c) y! k: K6 u! d8 N& Eexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
4 n1 g2 O$ p) V* Squarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
4 N1 |+ R& b& U% m( _/ x+ H5 [6 ein the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit3 }4 W. c- {- @/ i6 o! ]3 C
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
$ M& M' D2 R4 ^7 h3 |more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,8 t" A9 n) s8 ~
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal: n6 h8 ]4 o+ H/ ? t5 i
LePage Real Estate Services.
4 x' Q* b0 i. \' z8 G
$ S! g1 m8 k" s3 x) q; ^ Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
, N: B; g$ H% N* H7 Q( ]( b5 Jare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic- O+ w" t8 f. }" R# l
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
/ n' `+ E; l) c& Ksound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
$ x4 |9 P0 O- q; eresidential real estate sector.: m! p( t/ C6 O [
% L/ o( U) o2 `+ G" y: m Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation2 @9 V- J- G1 m3 I: `9 }
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
! x) X; _! J b5 D* E7 _) qyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562( x, [5 W* j6 N! C7 P4 m! J
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380; [! o, ?" |* ^0 @4 u# `
(+13.2%).1 X$ H# R. z$ X% I q% t
. m& s, t4 k& M# e& l' h! n. ^2 A# m3 f "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
- g1 C1 q0 W0 B, j; s+ mduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
: T4 [# n) l, b% F0 pfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are) P/ I# |' I. Q3 b
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,/ l, Q7 F+ W* o0 Z, [' f
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
& N& Y3 D- n- l. U"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We) ~7 s8 d7 {0 o5 K U; U
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
9 ~! q, U$ W2 u8 j' s2 kbalanced market."4 g: a+ ]+ Z) S; S
* ~9 F1 | R' l Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
7 ^+ ^1 x4 o2 R- \1 W" Lconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift. J: W! y3 v( q5 U+ p7 t. f# `
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
- P5 A5 u" d4 a8 C i- Othroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
" y' m& v6 C+ t5 B/ Z' menergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,/ t% \1 h# b% P
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record& h7 L9 b4 g+ |' K2 ^
breaking price appreciations.
9 h0 X( M) d, ]2 `$ X- D S* C2 n
1 i% u7 H' Y6 y, B7 {9 U Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
" S/ b& p V' F% a) k4 S! Teconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the1 F' ~ t: S9 P U, ^* a q: Y( W
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
* N) P S* }, w& n! C
: {/ a S) ?- t In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid- i e/ w5 `9 Z9 M2 P# Q8 \; k! \7 D
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
. i5 j6 ^7 R- ^( V0 b' O; o; sconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
) t- f; C. F# w1 A5 `/ `* [slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth./ A& a% b% g" Y& b6 [, m
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers' S. N4 f2 h' }3 u
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
$ S: _$ j3 ^$ K- Iprice appreciation when compared with 2005.& u- \$ \ Y. q* ?7 Q; X
! T8 N7 C3 C% X+ E
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
3 c9 ^: M9 D$ Kmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and+ U& z1 [0 e7 t2 {/ T- E. z2 p
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada: V7 Z. N- F7 }) ~7 u
are markedly different than those found in the United States.) R& f5 D; v c2 m7 b( E# y
( b& @+ o4 u1 z
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
3 ^- I- q- Q8 ]* f& MAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's) O- b3 e: W6 P$ h1 F4 ~* I1 O
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
" M( L3 A8 q2 Orelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general2 J/ y. R( K2 i% T* f* d$ R
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
6 ]1 C/ o* E$ v3 B6 j- Q) M$ hdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
4 d4 [6 x& O/ m1 B0 laggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization, G% G- e Q1 W: H) R7 G/ `; l
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
5 G! V0 ~ \+ c0 n" f3 X: J5 F' o( h& N* Q5 S; D# B
<<$ H$ m! X+ |5 D( s# a9 P
REGIONAL SUMMARIES
+ t% C$ n, y2 p- O >>
& O8 a& q; ?5 l. L* q) R/ |7 n5 x* r
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
" k* g& y, O. P% GHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate: m8 p( D @' Q% |$ P
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time1 z7 ]$ Y# ~+ ?: h
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of, q- S' ^; p3 l$ c2 \9 [
renovations.
3 N# W/ L8 ]2 [3 _5 ~
4 e% A1 G" L( Q1 @" `1 E The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight5 S3 U2 p: s1 z4 w
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
; O7 F q2 m0 O0 E& zcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and: D* G9 P6 b# q1 v V4 d" d* [
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.1 u! \2 T2 f- Y$ W. T
0 v: G" [6 C/ w, Y The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer9 O) q: a0 Y% Z$ Q* ^: k
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
) N4 O7 h& s7 o9 nquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new/ E. J2 o Q0 p
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores7 q2 s) x9 q$ ]6 D7 C: T. O
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
- Z1 J3 e; L2 N* S3 Iand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.5 @, }3 q4 w# m" G5 q, Q- W6 z
4 M7 G# ?% g- C
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced$ d, w3 O: ^5 S4 ^* ^/ K
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their8 v" d! v) ^- ], H) Q- U
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
+ u6 f9 I9 }4 o6 Y6 G, H5 }was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian2 N1 N- N, r" \
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing. K6 t9 M, h5 H' \5 t% Z
buyers with more options when looking for a home.1 Q8 z' R" w% Q! j8 s
* Q" _- c+ @" P8 K' S
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
8 W( U* j: ~3 ^; M4 H0 Famong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes4 D$ f, `7 `* a1 z: n5 E
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
: r0 r9 Y8 Q! }- |3 ?0 M4 s+ ~as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
: _4 j+ a0 S. X/ x. E2 M, jfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
' i% j0 s1 z$ }2 N+ P' l+ c1 N- Y- E- ^$ q
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house, d9 s4 Q) ~( t& D7 x1 d0 G' b
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory* U/ o/ a+ v- k/ S) M! B1 I7 n+ x
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
& Y( \7 E* N2 l+ afirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
! `/ H) K. ?7 awhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
1 }" O' k; c$ m3 U$ }5 kpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before, `4 M! ?2 [4 M4 p% S; x8 ~. s# p7 F9 o
making a purchase.( o9 r, z* u' A4 C4 V
/ J* {! N t. U Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
( |( M) U: T/ M2 {# I5 ~markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong1 }5 Y! }1 X9 d( b# H
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
) R0 L1 `$ K) Kcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting8 s7 ~8 H: t5 V; c) h; |7 H( ^! p; j
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown) X; x- K* i/ |& B8 i2 H. M
amenities.
6 w, K; Z7 w* j6 u; O: Q) x% R& K) Z, |
. J& a' A8 e0 h$ w: h+ X2 }/ F The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels" `1 [1 \0 m. K- j
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
8 E' B6 _# t0 f$ M! sacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has5 B4 R- r1 t3 d) J% r5 W: Q
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been3 p( @' i9 \7 c2 O
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
, | W7 p3 X$ Y2 q$ d7 sresidence, rather than for investment.3 i# V! _% \# Q# ^# Q. {
6 B$ P( M( i( R% ~. } The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
" h/ ]$ s5 _7 s5 |7 V0 Jhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
' F# u) e3 R5 O' Sin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer3 S8 q% m' d4 {" Q) p% U- p
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization$ k2 m) y7 i' G3 ?
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter1 u. ^$ e' o6 U8 E8 X
the market.
- Y8 r, m* \2 X! i
0 {8 y/ \4 J0 _% B In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through* \- C' X7 J3 u/ M% l" W: P
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In3 | R0 m6 p' Y6 Q7 L9 }7 d: T- f
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
4 D3 G4 Z2 ]0 E' J, Q8 G5 lmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due$ `, C- h! `$ w( i% c8 l
to the shortage of available inventory.
8 m: L: o2 ]8 a$ g. a3 `6 X( ^2 B$ G/ E8 r! {: {* n; x3 r' r
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its! f) O) \+ n% w
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains. O6 S$ m# Y+ J v8 B6 b- H0 P
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses' F2 @4 A4 I. P, {: q9 F/ }
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
! \, t H1 h. f) h8 P) l& B
+ }( M5 M" k/ P# }5 `" y Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
; Y* T3 k- N) p; M6 qin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low$ L/ U4 T9 I3 V% \& C- c6 l1 L
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
& a4 L1 g S/ v+ A5 C) Rpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring: z. q- ]0 ^& T$ O( y" m; X
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer. c9 ]5 v! A; n2 K# X# A) [! ^
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
v" o0 e; U' N9 z5 ~buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
1 s1 T C. h3 l$ S" H; y
* |+ I+ B' d1 l2 \ Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter* y* a3 N# k/ [% r: C) u1 v
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
$ t1 D3 N5 q M( M$ c- w8 Qremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,0 { w6 o8 I2 t# B1 U
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
0 O0 |+ M* U) @increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
( f( {* v, v3 m2 r; Q) `. f6 Win the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly J+ b$ q+ ]: x6 z7 g
towards the end of 2006.
2 [: n" F0 g0 a2 t* i& b2 _( C& F
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of% c" _: |2 d8 n+ C+ K
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
0 @% m4 B& K: k2 c% Hto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse- ?% [8 l9 ], M) q8 M( A: i/ X# V
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to6 F* _; t9 b) U: A _( B
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added7 n" W2 v6 X) G9 t, D
pressure on tight inventory levels.
: t; \/ m( `9 L$ W5 r3 }( v/ f! D6 n8 J8 I/ Q/ h1 M
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
# t: p' e) J0 a$ h) ?& ?7 F Xfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people$ i( Z5 y5 x& s P \5 d& x7 |6 @
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;1 C! K7 P+ H1 k1 o
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
2 Y# _ Y" W* u( mfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
6 e Z/ @' ~& f2 h/ v+ R% S* ?' [8 R2 R6 N3 }* P! _2 ]& h
<<
" {6 R; W6 c) T5 O* T1 { Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006' c0 X) |' ~- |" G* ] z7 F
3 t% R% d% X$ C, D5 N
-------------------------------------------------------------------------' Z! b* R! ?; b1 M# Q" j. P$ T
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
, ?# r' h$ v8 d! Q# g$ ^/ c6 H -------------------------------------------------------------------------( l! r: H D& l- n
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
9 m9 }7 E* {" i Market Average Average % Change Average Average
2 I2 C" f2 ]% W1 i3 I# } -------------------------------------------------------------------------" K' [9 Z& \& i9 l% U( Y
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
7 u" [4 J4 L6 ?6 ]3 d5 z -------------------------------------------------------------------------) g1 p% h, r$ {- i2 X! M
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,0007 F4 t K0 Y1 t. Y, U' A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------" y6 G& l3 [( q$ P1 y; d- V( i
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
; [- D4 b. |: U% W1 ~ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% f6 |; h6 S7 }9 O2 H1 E0 e4 Z; \ Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -4 M' G- r& O. H* O
-------------------------------------------------------------------------' {6 B5 I) g$ s- y2 p* Q; H
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
. _# S- ]8 p* e6 M. e! F% ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------) [1 d3 j- P' Q
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,5832 G ?: X* l5 V R3 l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 E( E5 n% \1 a' j9 K5 I$ N
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185' X& u9 W# `6 U3 G u# G, s: O
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) D6 _% `; N. l3 j: \. s Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250& b5 p, m3 L! N! S% d) R$ ~, _1 I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, \" ~4 L7 N) n% v Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766+ B- d! F1 D0 Z( P' L7 g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 Z0 l7 U# r3 y% W0 j" e- d7 L
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707' J& j4 p, G6 l! ~: X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ C- W* B$ b3 k* m0 b" j* f4 C" U Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
# p& u: f1 ?% |! k -------------------------------------------------------------------------. g7 ^/ Y( k, R" i/ ?% |
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
2 F/ K/ N: \2 s! n -------------------------------------------------------------------------' n& U4 U( p$ _. |. o, I
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
) { K( F( ~$ b' ] x- p* j0 x( i -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 \! ^+ {2 f3 t& j Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
$ L( D6 L8 h/ ]7 V* m% K9 h0 u -------------------------------------------------------------------------. `. c+ @/ n& E' o9 z: n% v
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
+ a0 f. @/ g8 Q( q7 w3 m6 C) { -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 U: D6 Q' f, M4 `
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
, q9 r/ y! ^% N: ?7 F9 D -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' u8 {9 |4 d8 Q/ [
. I( G5 U+ F, x" J2 K9 v -------------------------------------------------------------
: [" y& Q6 {' P+ P; h( p9 o( r3 F Standard Condominium( u. F& s2 p) K% i3 {
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 d3 D1 j- {. C3 E$ ?& c 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
; j! Y7 m) g$ m Market % Change Average Average % Change/ q3 F8 F0 z, P7 y; j5 D
-------------------------------------------------------------* a) M) C: J* S! a5 j7 M
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
# n; X7 s* i& O% K) j8 Z8 {! _ -------------------------------------------------------------) D1 r$ |/ f+ x A9 Y
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%, m% ~& ?! `& r5 O
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 w4 _1 o7 C9 N7 [; l3 q Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
: i* Q9 l6 @# n$ |% | -------------------------------------------------------------0 I$ g( s0 h9 e B1 m! C
Saint John N/A - - N/A% u# E/ v; N6 p* S; d H
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 W5 b) P. J E7 q$ | St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%& z; i* z6 x4 i' X9 A/ |
-------------------------------------------------------------
. ^ B8 j5 {* f Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%3 \+ G3 D. [3 X2 @: Y! H+ u4 v, @
-------------------------------------------------------------- q% @, @& y& }* K4 m( y" _6 G
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
# o# M, i: R6 O% t -------------------------------------------------------------5 w1 q7 h, {( m# X
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
6 Z3 Y2 G- e+ d -------------------------------------------------------------
. A9 T6 u5 l6 X$ X a Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
* s# x( h5 K7 U0 }. Q -------------------------------------------------------------
: o4 v) |* L$ n3 Q+ D: y Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%% [2 v' l( H7 Y0 r1 s
-------------------------------------------------------------5 C# |& z5 f0 F& M
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%2 v$ y2 C6 J% f6 P3 H" _7 b" z7 \
-------------------------------------------------------------
: S1 x7 |+ b; M7 H- l7 K Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
1 v* \* P6 \- W& N0 x -------------------------------------------------------------* O J, t4 u1 c2 K! E0 x k4 B5 O
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%% T2 m5 r; L) @3 M3 G3 c B
-------------------------------------------------------------
: k$ r3 _/ W; k0 L; T, ^. k. H Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
+ _9 n5 q2 D; K7 y1 t -------------------------------------------------------------; M+ X% F' N5 ~5 Z7 r6 {+ `
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%" U# l' k4 E) m4 t' f, G
------------------------------------------------------------- u: M1 ~9 B G U/ o
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
9 [" M+ f/ |* O4 K1 ?4 u -------------------------------------------------------------
: O. M/ ^& @ i+ n0 d2 f! e+ q >>
+ E( t7 L* g$ q0 h3 C$ S6 d! o
9 u3 I* W6 B) E: J, d! c Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined( A( ^0 b0 _+ x
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint7 \" n5 A9 m2 C4 ], ~
John and Victoria.( j4 O, P) v! t3 p/ U( h6 P
& Y$ H- r: t I3 L# p/ p
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most/ [( ?, H' @) e8 \+ D
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of! c7 ^ P" A1 W. I& E2 g9 E
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
8 e0 ?3 p. N# D$ m4 r0 C& `references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price4 e1 u+ k: @8 |' b$ g
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities7 h1 b, w: _! S* ~
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
4 Y4 F4 l+ w4 Xavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current. N" w( @* e+ S$ @$ c1 f
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable0 ^+ Z2 u2 g/ b
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on2 T7 a- N8 j9 H: S1 I+ |( i3 {
November 15, 2006.) M& [: s5 U b6 j& N% e9 ?
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of: c6 l+ l0 H* O3 y
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge: Y* q2 ]/ _; ^& r [& c8 K9 h
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is3 J7 ]! y7 \; u) g% ^
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|