埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2568|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable & G# [$ a! P3 \; G. W

& e. t- U) ?' w- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -2 [$ x$ M2 F. \6 F' D" g  Q' C

5 \& _& f5 s7 t    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
' t4 C1 U$ |- f" I  m" uexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third* e- N% E- N( s% h! ]( {
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic' @+ ~( F0 x1 }7 L1 O1 f
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
& w6 I+ `% y: Z0 l0 m$ f1 bprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and$ Q- O2 o" C% L# y, [
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,( B  V& ^9 b6 o+ q
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
+ y4 W% \3 n5 p2 v5 M1 lLePage Real Estate Services., M, O( Q; v3 E
- H$ p) p6 M- M5 T, G! ^! t
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters8 d/ [9 @1 W( M
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
0 V' z( j* B7 Q1 I6 T9 w9 S+ B6 Bconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and, |; ?6 ?% `4 G* t1 d! w. o
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the, W/ D2 Y/ [3 h- A8 U1 d' A: X
residential real estate sector.
# N. Z; @8 \) R. Q' @% {6 m3 ~
( F$ d) a8 X9 h0 f# Z    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
# i8 J# G" D/ \! s  Moccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)6 }  m; |9 V! p
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
5 Z" n9 g( u1 o: z$ I  e(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380) e6 ]: M' ~& R0 P2 b' U: L9 h
(+13.2%).
& V$ `5 ]  p& P% s2 b; m5 ^; e6 |8 y4 C5 ?
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
- y. d; v3 k% n7 h1 g8 a2 Eduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
0 ]3 p. m; R& E2 g4 ofrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are+ [3 E, G' a; l  z2 @! F% x
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
+ Q& f1 i: p6 O! p. spresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
/ i! T! t& l) n% f) \"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We( p. ?& B7 \, b8 O) ?3 g
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
0 w+ X# W4 U) k0 x' pbalanced market."
1 j/ C' I# s" a. f% R8 N. ?0 [% ?3 s& _
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,& j) E) Q) J7 b* ?7 T: ?) @
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift! e7 Y: u% U$ E6 f0 B: |8 `2 F
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
. ?. e; c+ F: _8 Gthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core  f5 S9 _2 ?; j/ L3 V
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
/ q/ s$ ^) p2 }$ A, D, s2 Dmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record# h. f2 j- h( K' g7 H# F, s. h
breaking price appreciations.
+ W+ _+ ^' M* u0 q0 l; @. w4 |' }
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding# V* B2 n2 a+ O' Y9 w
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the+ C5 b; ]1 T- k: E# z; s
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.+ m1 }7 o: V2 N, R& }( d$ r' @9 A
$ d, B5 C- ~! l3 G$ p! L
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid  a7 _$ V) }3 m
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer* X: E9 y5 d2 i1 _
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
' I9 {, D2 d/ r7 m* o: ~0 |- b3 m7 W0 hslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.) G$ |6 _& g6 u2 [
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers0 S; ?% b9 M0 @& y, e" t8 }
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
; g3 ^3 ^& C1 E! p- R- Iprice appreciation when compared with 2005.+ f- T0 M* N% M  m

8 l8 [4 A+ V/ `7 p) E    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
7 S+ e, n4 A& O' s- L% ]market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
/ [1 H' Z: |' l1 ?% z5 qfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
# _6 k) `& j+ F% o1 h' Aare markedly different than those found in the United States.; t! X' x) \4 t! l- u3 Y
- n3 L+ q0 M3 |9 p* y5 X
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the# I' t' A3 Z3 v0 X6 z
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
; U# Q( A' ?0 g7 N# x* dfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
, ?% o: ^9 G' v7 arelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
+ X( ^" ?9 t' c' ^) Uaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
' j; t/ z5 _( {* u; ddownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
  `1 l. ^" R4 l8 caggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization5 Y7 i; e4 O' j$ |# S. R3 ?
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
/ ^5 q" f% j' L8 N& M3 Z9 J
: p7 K9 a: J# y    <<3 m( E/ j. g9 H! N$ d
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES1 |/ F* E, \2 E- P% j
    >>! t6 v! b9 e5 i

6 l/ B+ u6 Q8 e8 ^4 k- g# [2 n6 H; G    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
8 ]$ F! X* S  @& sHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
8 b1 s0 Q: R! j* q$ `of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time+ u4 J* J5 y: E) @
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
7 G9 h/ I7 p; n$ M, @renovations.# I& M& v& o) h# e& ^( |- B
9 n  \) A0 o& Q* }8 @( {
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight3 _5 C) h& E7 N
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
* K3 G  u: H) ?" Acompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and4 A. M4 ]. x" k/ c
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
; j* K( a2 O; f5 x8 R$ f% x+ q' S1 Y3 R* @2 S# h) \) L- s+ @7 J' P
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer" U6 A- Q  L$ A* j. |* n  O
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
6 {3 I& t8 d, w; }! \: Equarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new9 g- {# d7 o) W2 z2 B! A
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
: m. t6 J6 f' h# U7 xto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes5 D" X  Y) E' z* Y/ Z& O2 b: R. _: w
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
( ~4 [6 q  }, k8 j( S7 `9 V: g3 L& _% X6 t
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
1 d& |% I6 j" \2 i9 z: q- y% gconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their1 R( y! x/ I% ^4 @* ^( B% R
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
2 o8 a5 u4 _8 u% Y; ^was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
) g0 ^' s) N7 fdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
$ o) B$ Z7 p6 N* {( @4 o& y! W& o- wbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
0 i( W: e. K% t, O+ }0 E9 B4 J
) P' G$ l& y/ [! y1 y7 R, E; ?    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
7 ?) n; U. p+ n7 T7 W- Bamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes$ @$ H4 j  v- P) P. R
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
3 S: V' x1 s0 a# ias some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last8 t! X( R. v  Q+ E
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
1 _( S" C! y& [+ h& C; ]4 q1 U
. T- U" e$ d/ H: V+ U2 I  I    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house; a+ x4 q* l4 ^3 v7 U2 ~
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory: W( A0 {3 e: m0 G/ j
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
7 x- Y, m* ~" P) k: l) {! e) `$ sfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
5 }; r9 h; y# z. ?when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
2 e/ T: X( c+ a! ypressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
; i7 `" P& a6 F/ pmaking a purchase.
# ~& i, K+ `# K, T, l, X  g6 u" P
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing+ e: ^0 K# N8 C9 O& Y
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
. T# O) ?& V! @; ^" Iconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
  L, g+ Q& V2 C( b+ R' {9 E) dcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting' g1 F/ C4 `: {0 \* @; k4 o7 t
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
6 W$ E" p1 ]* Mamenities.; j$ X- O, ?$ s, D# ?5 T" ?9 k
2 S6 ]8 H3 p* B* t' z- `
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
6 H. l4 C5 R# I% cthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand) k( z- N/ v! v& A& ^2 a* \
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has* F& L; E( `0 R6 S# B& |; [$ ~
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been& y9 N1 d0 v' v- f9 r- n0 ]
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle7 o5 }( ~6 d6 U# N5 u; @" D
residence, rather than for investment.
- S0 k% ~8 H1 B% T$ r/ h7 R& y% j/ I
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as; G; Q5 ~5 a% Q, A+ y
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
' F+ L4 |3 A. [7 p0 N, X. v. ~0 x, k! Min a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
& I9 Y4 X: X( a. m* q' j8 Mconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
1 L) }) j/ P: C8 Y' x; hrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter% ?( }" t+ G4 k' A
the market.# T, a  _  n0 q. \

: j" q! i0 \% S+ r" H, G" P1 J    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through* O% A  m# l+ y) X$ q# `
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In" m! w4 s3 q* X: M9 h
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
0 r( L& s# N4 ?0 G1 G5 tmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due/ w2 x. k9 f3 m$ q" H! d. I
to the shortage of available inventory.7 q% ?3 `4 X# B& P/ U9 y6 D

8 {8 ~7 D- M4 F9 U    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its' c# @  Y. x0 {2 l$ w
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains4 ?' Z! e; N# U
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses; V6 y$ R( G' g
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province./ C! m+ W1 S. v* C; t) A  r, j2 a

0 ~) |6 O. |, O    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases# t  C" z8 v! y: [2 M! K
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low( U; k( b$ M) `9 i
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that' R9 a. T& X9 E0 k! d
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
% @% G3 `8 n- \% ^& q6 n, vprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
( t# b2 S. I) Y  k0 ~: Fseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as, Z& n; B7 z' A: J* `, a
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
/ J% Z" @4 ]+ n, P
9 @- w7 P! b3 ^- \, D% R% e
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter+ N* Z( E1 c/ ~
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
7 V7 O+ q6 P3 d$ jremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
! @! s7 m% b! L; w. S/ @# ?8 Emaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
/ ?- ^$ C2 P8 {% ~/ `, e7 o2 fincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
6 x6 k1 S+ {* C4 T. E# x* ein the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly4 [: s$ j9 e' F' a& v
towards the end of 2006.
    ( E& n( C& s- g' z: ]6 h5 a
  `* x$ T/ l: H6 u- }! k
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of3 {5 V6 l0 ]7 V' {( e) h% T# L0 Z$ p
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
% w' k2 I6 n/ n3 {$ lto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse( W- z3 I6 Z- s6 |
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
, Z, K! r% k2 cforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
  G0 H6 r& _/ upressure on tight inventory levels.% O: C# x, V9 g! |9 b! N/ b! w

) X; O$ Z. H8 E8 M. y8 r  b4 n# j    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic! U5 H6 A: e2 B& M4 G
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
' X7 P) O# o. I, ?) v1 |! M3 C2 Einto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
4 x/ D6 }& [/ X& {" p. u$ n6 Twhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
; ?' b3 ~  O% z% Z# Y; Jfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace." q$ d! E8 ^. }( n

. l% O" A) `/ k* W0 A3 O8 u/ w% u    <<
  @$ }, N" k' ]9 G3 }1 K, z      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006& c& }# e* X1 m: D
5 o' u9 o$ L  D2 e4 ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) W1 a  p# [: Y" J2 m
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
+ ^; N7 X3 U+ ?4 G    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" c2 c1 m/ M- l( G+ L                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
' X: R- {# k) C9 L3 ?2 w& N    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
, w, ~9 Y. Z, f' W$ m, G    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, l+ _! E! s0 e! A: I
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000; @9 i1 ^; m" C& P
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; H7 Y" Y; a) G$ v6 P" n    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
2 ?+ h0 G$ W! b4 W    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: u  l7 U) J' I3 O. a2 h& F
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000. l0 N" F5 h$ X9 |
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" g! Z4 A3 @% H8 X2 k  {
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -( S3 A  i/ X* n
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# y  e' ]; B6 w3 U) X( E; }    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333) G: Z$ S1 v6 Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* O$ h' H0 z8 q3 c. O) s    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
5 W, R. h/ a, c# P$ h5 o1 C4 r    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 ]  T2 `7 a  i6 h9 s8 {& h8 r7 R6 s    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,1852 N0 l; ^' y) Y4 x! U* e5 w
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 E0 L' a& @; g& c9 d% m( \    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250/ B; A4 n% a! P/ L; D5 c
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  ~4 N2 z) L3 u6 N/ Z
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766& X  P  |9 ?3 p1 k  Y$ y5 k" v
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% F( D, a7 v* f3 ?" {6 H
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707( y4 `2 W7 S8 G* U; g# I# w
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  b* z4 _# f9 y/ K    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,5002 I3 x. s$ ~; O+ v1 n
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- @5 S7 ]& m2 ~7 h    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
! B+ \+ x4 P0 n' @    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 Z: f# F$ y6 V    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
8 d. d3 p) }- c    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 z3 ^9 X, Y3 q0 y0 \
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
. r+ Q0 Y6 K7 t# s! f6 ?8 X6 l    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; W% m& a( B# _
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
9 O% J( }2 t8 z+ t) n" F    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 B5 l/ M- m2 ~/ e* J" i0 Z    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
/ X4 A6 i- X+ i& W0 r    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, ]) U0 A" `# [
- V" ?& N$ [% {* M! [    -------------------------------------------------------------5 F& u1 o, R0 _- u& a
                               Standard Condominium  e4 o5 `3 F% u% w
    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 H8 u" u, ~0 f; X# b+ q3 k* j                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo* i  w) R% z% }+ I1 i
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
  f% s$ U+ h5 c2 j+ R& ~- g    -------------------------------------------------------------
' A. R- Q; X8 J/ E8 I6 g* g" x    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
2 M8 R; B. k) `1 T    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 s2 |9 a# c& o$ @5 e2 t& \    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
, A2 h" s0 h0 A% U    -------------------------------------------------------------
; W2 N, i! I+ y    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
6 t& g4 \; |0 m2 K$ d    -------------------------------------------------------------
. `3 R! ^% }' k! h- w5 x3 }  O" @% ?* z    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A  u1 O; F, Z. |3 y  v9 c7 R
    -------------------------------------------------------------# ]4 u  H7 M7 c; b4 h
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%9 O1 p% F, [) V) R
    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 h2 q, ], p8 [; t) m    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
& w- X/ \4 v* y8 A" p$ ~7 ^    -------------------------------------------------------------
- J, F) Z. E2 {4 z/ q0 w2 h$ \( A    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
9 a" V) B4 F; v" {% [1 A    -------------------------------------------------------------
' e! T0 @( `9 K" ^    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
4 M' G! p9 t: I8 m9 q    -------------------------------------------------------------! N3 m6 t2 l& [! ]) b- Y
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
8 h; J8 f5 ?; P  v    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 Z+ ]- r/ v; l$ ~! L/ I) X$ G    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%4 i% j2 a' v, Y# F1 u3 i
    -------------------------------------------------------------
, b" |; s  Z$ f# p8 ?    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
$ Q3 f( j9 T/ |  `% g; p    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 B+ V( F& P9 K% ]/ [% D' D    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%. g# O. N! q7 x) ?4 a# A2 H
    -------------------------------------------------------------2 w" v; O' w% F: R
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%3 \" `' h8 [( I9 q% \0 @6 g) R& E
    -------------------------------------------------------------
' d  G5 l: C6 f! m2 w    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%0 h1 G# h3 I9 w
    -------------------------------------------------------------
# U5 Q- x; U& }5 T2 {    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
+ N6 G% c$ k- s3 x! h    -------------------------------------------------------------7 u3 J1 v8 b) Q  b  t2 f% S
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%* I$ T1 g5 x5 K5 W
    -------------------------------------------------------------
" B! v# N" y( d    >>
6 e4 D, b& ?. r
" H& Z% A/ H  S    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
" g9 I$ {5 `+ @" cin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint. n! p' Z1 T. S( T4 s+ \) t- t& D- A* Z
John and Victoria.% y/ j" x1 n  `+ Y3 i2 X" D
: `) a3 o% s# s2 F7 D! j
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
6 i1 K5 i1 ~! {# k; s: Kcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
1 c: Y0 u' j& S3 \- s2 f% Bhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
' [0 O0 ?1 f# R, ?  X5 c% |. Areferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
6 o: i: @, ^  r1 J. K1 ltrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities. O: o; ]  R6 o
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
4 W9 V! M# [. S- O! aavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current  I2 Y. P7 Q3 b% h9 @$ ^/ ^
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
* D& d( Q( U' t0 L7 T" N( kversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
& ^& g* K4 ]/ q2 F. ZNovember 15, 2006.
8 c3 E- ~" `' X! ~! p$ D' r' z    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
. L( t6 S( W2 g/ s- P+ P8 }5 E3 p3 Hfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
0 P' d; a0 m8 ?* R! vprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is& ^) ~# v# F3 a# n
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-8-14 22:50 , Processed in 0.125100 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表