 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 8 n; q' {& t3 ?* y! a
' ^! D$ q' s" p5 r+ V0 |
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
& I# f% Q) [" J* `
! _: ?. L- ~$ U7 L1 L. z TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
% m! }" C2 n1 g3 v# S% k! a6 u! Fexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
4 N, f% _( B# y: qquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic. [9 [6 t; [* R% T& p% x2 x9 ]! B! B
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit1 F- B- @3 p3 J/ W P# q- \
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
" b2 f( ?( ` Ymore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,( t& a0 w) c7 G
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
" e7 I& Y: J' x6 K# ILePage Real Estate Services., A+ O" c+ T: T3 p' }
8 d- }5 v2 J2 v/ l Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
! S3 c% e& M5 a4 }9 M& jare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
, L1 L; n$ N$ i/ Jconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
/ s! I8 U1 \: _: ]5 F0 ksound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
9 I# q1 ]5 P; N; P# nresidential real estate sector.
8 b8 B( Z0 [3 r" n. W3 T' {8 x9 S% Z q6 |3 Y- M
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
7 U7 ~& W; e. Voccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)9 m# p) @$ L# F( e' d# l
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5622 ^0 W5 } T! D0 K' w1 {& u' h
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
7 l2 e3 ?2 O9 w6 S1 Z' U(+13.2%).
3 Y; b1 K0 M$ h+ [6 j
4 |. T- c5 }( y1 C3 S: ] "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
2 n$ n# V4 a9 xduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the! @+ I9 F7 w- [6 s( ?# p; v
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
; ~. I9 a! }1 [5 {1 U7 Upoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
; j4 g( @4 J: `4 X: mpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
! @0 _ R- b7 A9 l! d( g"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
" G) q3 T4 x: |. K0 ^; qwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
4 E; i" {2 v$ Ybalanced market."2 g7 t* q9 L7 l. {# n, _
+ q/ ]/ L0 [' d3 O- n8 V" Y @ Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
% l: B' w9 O5 j# ^5 ~' k! ~considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift8 z' I0 ~2 U1 n
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
3 |3 U! V0 ?* z5 c- athroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core; B" Z& U3 `9 ]+ }. y6 ^3 X
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
( r+ a$ a) Q z. lmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
1 ?2 k) e$ Z' z: z$ O( @3 Z+ k Hbreaking price appreciations.; V& C7 I k) i% G# U8 E* z
$ {( b$ t/ a# Z0 s
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
7 y) [% B1 X- @* B. G) w z$ reconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the1 e; x+ A* p+ S! C0 u8 [3 j' }
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
, w0 M4 K7 ^- N, J- r8 q- E0 M5 }6 Q6 Y1 d$ K
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid$ v0 ~( a+ F: {" m+ x! |( t
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer; B: O N. w Y+ T) X6 H o. |
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off, Q# ]; ~. [) t5 C- _- I- P0 h
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
1 S( u/ P5 c9 H ?+ [In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers* N7 [4 c* }! r/ v3 T
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of2 m \! M' ~# k6 D% F
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
1 @5 r8 `7 M. X* W$ v
1 l7 r) ], l( F3 s While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
3 r0 F; X5 j6 k- F5 [$ l1 }/ U( c" fmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
6 {) f' O- j6 |, T, _financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
/ g+ h, o/ W. ?0 E, Y: U! [; X) r! \are markedly different than those found in the United States.; Q" A) M! x I- r: l3 X
' [# r$ a* x+ {5 B* p" O# p) p Q
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the' E) p- Q- ]" I1 A
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
& B5 V1 J1 _! j( l; Nfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
3 l ^+ ^7 d: f$ ~" Irelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
' y5 e4 f8 A! W& t" Waffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
$ J; v7 ~& q) Gdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
7 i! o$ \$ i! K' aaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
4 @; M' A5 c0 e# P$ bmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
/ b* ?) F2 K$ C9 t6 X
, {# ]% L" x* ]- E- Q <<. T4 }9 p& p' B% l# n! f" T
REGIONAL SUMMARIES8 ^2 ~: d0 K2 l. O0 j
>>
2 ]4 Z- X4 J. ~7 P( C5 m4 s
, R' F/ [/ ^ d/ N Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
0 }( G) {6 d/ k8 p: nHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
/ g. T+ v6 G# A2 bof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
. f y8 X5 s2 c% ^9 j* H) ilooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
6 n& Y: J1 E) `2 Y5 k- ~' Erenovations.2 [# _ H% ^4 E( f
- g* t- A$ S/ @# v) U
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
' X$ [# i8 _$ u$ ~$ I2 Lincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation4 l+ v; U$ i- V+ E2 P1 H
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and8 D* U' j9 L- `: L4 W6 ^* ~
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.# Y- x3 z: a4 C* D' s
n0 X/ }1 y' S, D2 ~+ {8 F" v
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer1 W( }. v6 v+ F# Z6 X. c
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the3 a X3 M9 K$ a1 {- a. k! j7 p- C) s* v
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
( ?# I4 c( P! Y600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
$ V/ V, f& P) \( q; _to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
* j# t: i/ J$ V2 p- _and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.- B9 m5 q2 ]. s! O% m$ l0 L
. k. O9 r) a& R% t In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
j0 c- _; B0 c* I9 R/ Z2 i, lconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their7 k/ a4 P$ v. V4 s! q
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
. e) L! a1 s' K0 b; Bwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian; d7 r# L& @% |; `
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
+ _% H8 t) ]7 V7 P2 [; gbuyers with more options when looking for a home.4 a1 Y/ s6 B5 z7 {. F0 L- |9 j: q+ K
& ~ q& Q' j4 }) l6 U; s Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly$ c& w( Y9 t( C/ K( u, h: {, N
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
+ U) y& U8 z2 [priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,% b! e; O9 G: @3 d `
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
$ ` T$ C% x5 W" \$ Nfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.8 O5 f2 z* p1 B" N9 b
p* t: }$ e; T; N: g- m3 [ Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house ?- E' X" |2 ?5 q' W1 s) x
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
. I0 Y: ~5 q: ulevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
) D( m! O+ N# f" z! f9 j! W, Qfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,- L) D0 G- A1 o4 t/ e! a
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the6 X! @, [7 k; Y
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
7 s0 k7 O9 @$ N% F% |( g8 D7 pmaking a purchase.- |4 r' j7 v) _4 a# i! T
$ \2 }, V% V0 y, q
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing3 I" W/ Y; f/ K$ {- u
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
; j) X) z5 i" v' f2 k: ~confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city( z. p( N8 ]( ~. ?' ] H4 L8 @; `
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
+ u' U# U/ |1 v8 ^attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
2 w3 ^* J# |6 ~amenities.* n1 S; C. h* f( K8 I, z
& Z" _. G0 H/ y1 e1 [ The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
2 G# t6 G6 T# L- Uthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
! H& \. d: e2 ]/ ^' ]across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
$ T7 v7 d) e) a1 D- e) econtinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
* j. p: d3 D) w2 V7 `3 Y- Bdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle" s* v( m F' ?1 `! J g
residence, rather than for investment.
; s+ `2 f3 W" j# ]" k1 \0 w- {' z8 _6 q: ?1 x
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as6 E* e' T+ m/ }) m8 {
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted* Z# k1 z# h% r( q3 I
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer6 [2 r& u. U6 ?+ E3 b. F
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization. r' |1 r. T \ C# G! B' {
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
: E; p( I; J2 ]% Ethe market.5 d! A$ Z6 `, `+ M; }* M. z
$ Q y+ r9 U& V; N
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
, f2 s$ R8 _: aJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
1 N: N0 m! e9 n5 IAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
' V; I+ ~. X* h& ^4 }months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due( l+ ]: w7 t3 d1 t# u h
to the shortage of available inventory.4 c, L$ l# x5 S q
; ~ h' W# D' S& G {; K) E6 K
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its/ G! H/ k3 _& v6 h
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains' i* }% J, [- l
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses% O9 ^1 W; k% t% q' }
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
' j/ x) M' i* n
9 T( s ^4 U" u" y; c Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
j. Q2 X" |) z: o* xin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
. P, |; V2 l" [; v" f9 X5 sunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that$ J3 H' }2 M' N, L0 K* y# M# Z+ Z
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring( p( a A% P" `% {; o
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer- F( I" C: U0 _+ D$ G
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as* ?$ ~% O B8 ^ f
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.& ]& N1 D6 v5 r9 u }! K
" L7 b4 o2 {* f! @4 L
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
3 K e. a2 ^7 P# h; y, H& fas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton1 N9 N3 G& H; }. u! @: W
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
6 e' f6 ^2 s) ]6 d: K9 @3 dmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices8 `+ G c, O* y: Y! l
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
! B6 o- ]1 _8 |) xin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
, J! n( d2 F; etowards the end of 2006.
" o8 [4 {+ _1 b: B# r4 _% N1 A8 f# e; D& o0 G
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of" |& z* D+ X9 b+ u0 h$ C
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
" z! P" Z5 P3 L+ [to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse' u4 [- _# s) ~, q& P
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to6 d4 t6 o" i; {* ~
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
6 y) c0 m: D( T% {8 Y0 r' ~pressure on tight inventory levels.
6 A, O" g! o# ~
. ?6 s$ Z- Z: ~8 J- G* H Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic: \1 }4 Y8 g' A4 q" i' S q* L
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
7 _+ X0 n. D" K/ {into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;8 t5 d K# N# l$ A
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching1 A7 G$ S N; N) m
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.' d5 d( j# h9 ?0 U3 ^
4 J% O( e- x. a/ q# i <<; f; X$ o7 G6 r/ S
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20066 G- ^1 t3 U5 s( T( A
0 f' G* |; w/ ?# T# Z2 {: d( a. H- U -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 B$ x% D0 |2 [, T. ]5 I. J Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey5 X" X0 b1 j- g9 H, G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------: Y- W" P# G, R; U, \
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3; t. f% F1 v0 A! q0 `; X9 K
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
$ h1 q- v$ C* T- I -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 ?' i% G9 I7 I# q$ j/ e& B' |
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
$ T j* ^- O4 a$ h8 I -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 u7 J$ N# m5 U7 s Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000# x4 t. W2 J& k1 i0 L0 q4 \5 `
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 N4 O0 C d- i$ T& E" N
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
9 X2 n2 j% \/ w; W: o0 h" {2 } -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ w* V( k. k9 _
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
6 ?' S: ?& J! ]% n/ G -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, N$ Q5 s7 _/ i& B8 {+ c St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
& E2 d$ T! a7 C2 l J -------------------------------------------------------------------------% I6 @+ H9 f# }
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
# j' l" m# F: Z6 T! {1 [: S. w -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 S9 q/ R, F: P$ U0 j5 T* ` Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
3 S# j0 V [5 { -------------------------------------------------------------------------' S5 M) ^) S' a9 Q- t5 y4 w
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
8 F/ y5 n, d5 f9 K -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ X' v" w, L. A( |, O2 n Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,7663 H, `. j( z* S! t* e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 M. D. V( E( B" Q8 k) ]
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707) [# T5 M. C6 j4 B3 B
-------------------------------------------------------------------------; v8 J, P( `- `
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
. T4 H& T4 u9 ~' U8 m, ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ v. E/ m" f( z+ @; i) | Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
$ k/ T' H7 j5 T! n0 S3 b# V% A8 i( t -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 I5 \& S. L( T4 @$ ?, b
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
. p# b3 \, D x* T3 W% P2 S5 j -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 C# k$ n$ p1 T Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500- W& G1 v/ l2 d* M- _9 D% y ~! l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 q! r) b+ [) X+ T8 `
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000% S" p8 @; G' ~0 M6 w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 W. ?9 g; T5 h' U6 v National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860. p$ L w, y5 Y' |8 P6 L+ B$ p
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 ^: G9 u9 E6 f
5 U) z7 U5 [5 _$ F4 T -------------------------------------------------------------
! o3 C' x" E$ I r. ?% o/ l Standard Condominium
3 J; D3 a4 b- n" ^* z2 K -------------------------------------------------------------
4 d8 c# l4 |# g: B' y4 W- C4 k; o% _ 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo7 L: b4 J/ D7 d; N9 C6 T
Market % Change Average Average % Change
2 Y# ]' R1 i6 j1 j5 r0 C -------------------------------------------------------------
8 D1 p7 ?/ ?- ` Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
, T, t' O9 A* Y- H( x$ O! I( G8 Z% n -------------------------------------------------------------& w. l1 ^/ i1 U8 D/ G( K ^
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%. \. M$ w8 E: U
-------------------------------------------------------------5 p# f$ N; @0 H" Y
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A; U/ A* W) y# C
-------------------------------------------------------------
+ k4 o, S- C8 z9 h% y Saint John N/A - - N/A
$ g" N* T3 Y/ g) n- h/ }3 ~ -------------------------------------------------------------7 F- W" \/ O9 y/ t7 P
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%. c/ b% R& V3 ?/ |. Q) ?9 X
-------------------------------------------------------------& O* p( u* O/ l- w7 f% {
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
! F( _- h% W$ {$ |! `4 ^7 n -------------------------------------------------------------6 j1 \) z5 [! J6 t; l+ t1 ?8 S
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
* b& J7 o4 M0 |9 F* w0 T -------------------------------------------------------------. i7 g2 O% |# M/ u- X, z% H
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
8 [+ k3 Z! W5 s' [( o! N8 j -------------------------------------------------------------' E& g) N2 P8 n& h2 D9 l& S
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%* N9 Z* v8 Y5 z0 n) r. O1 N2 I& h n
-------------------------------------------------------------
' {7 Z# X; o5 w! m1 o( u% g" y Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
/ D$ q3 j0 M1 K' f& M7 z -------------------------------------------------------------1 e- b$ W6 U! S
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
! ]( T) g+ z( s- @ -------------------------------------------------------------8 c. r$ e2 I" E% a1 }4 }+ H
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
5 o9 s/ o- m' o# B -------------------------------------------------------------# ^) T. N/ B8 k
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
r/ I/ c; l1 n5 v' J* T% K7 z -------------------------------------------------------------
3 `( Q8 N7 W6 e( R# b Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%1 [! W1 }, Z! Z% J7 L
-------------------------------------------------------------& _1 r5 d# n4 Y3 f
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
1 U; z- I; p9 t; n. Q& F9 s -------------------------------------------------------------$ v: n9 l/ R- u
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%6 K* ?" H7 |; t1 ?
-------------------------------------------------------------
" i& F7 V+ F8 J2 R! O) V9 h- ]+ T >>
! L; Z5 ^) x8 R) v8 ~! }
. Q) U* O, T4 l# K Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined; `% S/ S% N/ D/ ?: G4 R
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
& X7 \0 e/ Y& U9 {John and Victoria.
7 M& o: {0 u9 P5 ?+ ~
3 B8 ^- ~+ C2 N# Y x The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
1 }& g d; Q$ J; _+ t# ^comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
# ]# b! z" e" J1 H2 K+ {housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
7 F$ h* {: Q! d0 jreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
@" O. W1 d4 ^trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities1 v5 J/ Y9 c/ @& ?
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is/ u# G. z8 J! @) o) _: K
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current7 ]) j) O! O7 d1 h
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
1 p. H! d3 o5 w) m1 Z) n# s1 q Sversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on9 c" m. D' F" H/ f
November 15, 2006.- S3 r$ s+ w3 v8 I
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
; {2 R* h! Q& n% A1 r# i; m9 Vfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge) _: e4 v ?4 I$ k# M6 J4 W% L+ U
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
! ]' T7 A4 T; I5 W; Yavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|