紫庄主,所谓的正义只是你当时的看法,时光流转之后,很难说你的看法是否还是一样;你从年轻时候一路走过来,是否有些看法是大大的改变了?如果有,那你所谓的正义也就改变了。程序上的公平有时候的确可能造成委屈 ...% x& \/ n4 \9 ` F2 s h; j% O% x
猪刀小试 发表于 2011-1-31 19:04
?, `2 C5 m+ |
靠,你这么一认真,我就想笑,是不是老杨的指示啊?+ A, h4 z5 R D
你别怕,我不会乱来的,话说回来,你啥时候看我乱来过啊?- K9 v: f/ h# H+ @# B
举个例子,举出来请你吃饭。% D4 N, ^- l/ P
NND,不放心就不要让我上任,老之不干了。
# q1 n4 p, r' C0 n# J
I agree. Everyone has his own version of 正义. As a result, conflicts can't be solved, due to a lack of common ground. % s0 L4 |% r' [3 n% f, J
2 R1 `2 F/ O8 `, NHowever, a 程序上的公平 is shared by everyone. Even if it's not perfect, it's a static thing that people know what to expect and adapt.
本帖最后由 tqbs 于 2011-2-2 14:03 编辑 4 V4 Q8 f" D% N4 H1 A) D" l
谢谢,希望所有的执法能够记住这句话。 & L; y4 q5 l* ^4 ]2 Q南京街头,现在没有老人敢摔倒在地,就是因为一次看起来程序合法但是不公正的判罚。( f4 i, Q6 n$ S$ k1 x
紫光 发表于 2011-2-2 12:43
$ \; D5 ~- _* p6 r) B" A, w# UYou are just being naive. If you think you can implement your so called “justice” by modifying rules, you are dreaming. No law is perfect. There are always loopholes. 4 ^0 M6 J) @4 k; v/ V. ?' h/ N; |# w2 E+ J: l
Let me tell you a story. About a year ago, a guy published a book in U.S teaching people how to sexually abuse young children without being caught. Disgusting, right? Guess what, there is nothing can be done to stop him. Why? Because it’s legal according to U.S human right law.
You are just being naïve. If you think you can implement your so called “justice” by modifying rules, you are dreaming. No law is perfect. There are always loopholes. 4 I1 p T0 S6 L$ M# V0 a % @/ c1 y, m1 w4 q' j+ @' XLet me tell you a sto ... 5 Z1 B1 J$ t g! J6 u' }tqbs 发表于 2011-2-2 13:20
( ^5 F9 f' j8 B2 H- H4 j# t \
你这段和我要表达的关系不大,没有完美的法律,但是可以有坚持正义的法官。