 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
/ e" v2 a( a/ _6 h- N) [5 I: h2 q5 M; p+ A
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
8 V7 v4 |0 v: h/ ]+ ^( n8 u3 K* C+ B Q4 Z4 D0 H/ i' R4 N
**********************************
' h/ {* p) R$ k, I7 KAnyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:, F; h! [( {, B% M4 U
7 j2 {! b+ {0 u4 s1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.
5 U: B+ k& Q2 `
" y, O9 s+ g. ]( x, `' c6 a2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
7 e' C! {0 N6 P+ C
7 Z/ U: O: Q, w' E! P8 o. X3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
, |1 y/ U) j2 X7 |6 b& w- T8 {
7 q }/ r0 z3 C4 M4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
6 _* t+ F7 Y' N; I4 v w) j. [/ y6 I- q* F
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|