 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:5 T) Q' v. t( R
p; T, B7 `& J+ e) s& H8 x, bF4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
; [* c& J! n/ i/ I" _& O& \: k& t/ M: L& i
**********************************6 m, t6 ~: n7 a2 i- H* S
Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
" Z6 c: ^. p4 y0 x3 G- d+ O6 F, J( u# k$ o2 \
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.
7 I! e0 g, Y* z: G3 }) V
$ O8 F8 e, ^! n* P% C8 n( d7 w2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
, N9 |* K, B! r- G6 l- @ b* _& s9 z* C/ a$ ]( j* V& t3 x
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
; B" V B( v6 E' ?" D2 `7 r+ n9 p/ S+ o4 p# s
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
: O& p! A/ q" P& q% i
( o+ Q7 \8 k6 j/ Z" q1 J) W5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|