 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
8 b9 A* s* a! C$ z" m, K$ P$ X
( p* ^, x- M& W) [ LF4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。6 {, e$ \7 N- A
o+ X! ?8 i0 F! X8 n- F1 w* |! S; ]**********************************6 h3 W4 u1 D C& }- F2 L) h4 O
Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
3 t6 w: y# N2 \& G% U8 m& n7 x
! T* }7 a, r# r1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.: Y- g4 b$ \, ?6 X& W: Y
0 f" q9 p6 { I2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.0 T1 g1 b. D2 A) W$ {
5 k/ i6 u+ H+ v3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
; [' V" J' p0 |/ f( D5 E3 T6 \- _6 l" H$ S" @! l! t
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.. `8 H) E q3 S
C1 a3 x" Q3 p, o2 R% r
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|