 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
P/ g" c9 b- d$ K+ w: M7 U8 ^& t/ k* p( h3 G0 N/ E( ?
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
7 X; L) u% G# _# |
5 x! d. c* i5 k9 ^- [/ V**********************************
" R' d0 r8 q% d. v7 Z& ]2 VAnyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points: X# I; E1 i# \7 \/ Q9 e
2 g" t0 Z2 }0 h4 @# l/ }- ~* K( A1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.
/ I$ A& m, |: K, B$ v4 \/ p" U8 G! Z( N! W+ n0 G/ p* S
2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
" L2 ~( g" l+ O& T# z6 c- _
$ s) O+ ` k. @3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
2 n2 A |% `+ Y7 g8 R- |! w3 B8 `+ K( v5 A
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
( h+ Q4 x$ c: I9 O
8 x$ r5 e% M' b7 j$ N5 w; n( p: D5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|