 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
8 [9 @! }* b2 P5 b4 e& b# [# p/ F/ w% d" f8 d
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
4 `! X# @2 Z0 U3 {# @3 p# A7 E7 [
" ?5 M% a9 {+ V1 P b! l+ q**********************************
+ `$ g9 B7 u# e2 B# \: d8 J0 P) i2 KAnyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:# G/ m: P1 ^, K3 C+ ?* \( i( ^
, C5 l* f$ ^& e5 x3 |2 i; s
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.
' W3 H2 z: z" O% Q4 ?. V+ f# m, A( U" F+ X$ y
2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.3 i- d" f" L4 ~2 T y9 k
1 x7 N2 d G U! h! K. I7 f
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
2 I; [( W) \8 c/ P# ?
, w4 Z% u' `9 b2 l/ m) Z4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
\# n& C0 U! W8 _; |7 O- h3 L
" y( C0 M% N3 p+ b5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|