8 Y/ P" J& Y I5 pRead the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995.6 u5 _: x( {9 Q0 G3 m m# p
There is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected. & v" u/ G& O; ?5 C1 j4 L- P! R# S3 k+ N2 ?$ l3 r1 {
Read the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995. * f5 i! T$ |% y7 j' ?9 z( M% I$ u* AThere is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected.- f3 U9 w# w1 { u+ o" a
7 _# l3 l" }: `' X' d; v! N4 L/ Q9 ?- `0 A" {
6 p! Z- i; X! ]5 z( j
3 U5 r) C" u, ~/ {4 y
+ j, B% @) m; U. g
E& E' ~3 G s* p7 Z7 @# t小黄 发表于 2010-9-8 15:03
4 [- n' W( s5 p* k0 e9 v % _% t! B: |$ f- c) o5 ?% l没错,是有异议,而且提的有道理,5 e+ ~8 |* J6 _5 M2 R
8 { X# I/ ~# V0 U: a" t( w
但是不能改变现行规则还是打包信任投票,三人是符合投票程序,通过投票上任的这个事实 9 {) |! p% V7 P* g. r7 c. J, l7 ?, B# C" ^+ H
记得你以前也说过,觉得不合适可以改规则,在此之前,你我都应该尊重规则