A survey of your preference(house type)

ceramistpalace

Which of the following you will vote for:

A.   bungalow
& ^# Y8 I* e& E; _0 i7 V" rB.   bi-level or foundation-raised bungalow
9 W2 @  _9 ?8 c5 A$ M$ ]8 j& Z: uC.   2 storey
4 ]2 M9 Z  c- R6 b. VD.   4 level or 3 level split
, ^% e& G4 `+ ~( R) w6 F" m/ R
  AND
3 Q8 H! b% d" \/ ?
What is the reasons for your choice?

ceramistpalace

seem like nobody is interested in this topic.

享受生活

bungalow or 2 storey

ceramistpalace

8 a& N0 v7 r0 {* w5 M 3# 享受生活
your reply is a rare gem. And  BTW what is the reason for your choice?

青萝

2 storey.
原因是：各功能区可以很好的分开；采光比平房好；楼梯带来的装饰美感；还有就是便宜（相同面积的2storey和bungalow比较）。
4-level split感觉上分的太琐碎了，随便从哪儿到哪儿都得上下几阶楼梯。
自己的感觉，不知道说的对不对。

宋兵乙

如果不考虑地价，当然是bangolaw最好了，方便，不用楼上楼下的，适合老人孩子。
: K0 g* ?- y- Z* s) E
1 u7 W( F( n$ E+ f- x2 a  }3 l但是edmonton 现下的地价，同样的地上盖2 storey 最经济适用。

' V" J0 v, S- u0 p最不喜欢的就是4 level split.

YOKO

1# ceramistpalace
9 d2 ^, {4 J/ U) T) h5 |" NA and C

ceramistpalace

2 storey.
/ [# O% _& S1 L* `- w4 w原因是：各功能区可以很好的分开；采光比平房好；楼梯带来的装饰美感；还有就是便宜（相同面积的2storey和bungalow比较）。
0 |% F5 `2 Z& B' J/ ?) @2 y8 A4-level split感觉上分的太琐碎了，随便从哪儿到哪儿都得上下几阶楼梯。
自 ...
青萝 发表于 2009-11-11 09:13

+ D7 i$ m$ q; I% \4 f8 m* u  y" ?: j, ^There is no right or wrong when we are talking of PREFERENCE. Thanks for your response to this survey.

小黑炭儿

I like bungalow because it's more convinient. We are living in a 2 story right now and there are too much running around, upstairs and downstairs. It make me tired.

propeller

C.   2 storey