 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
& q1 Q( m ~# U# f; C/ ?from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove! L8 [& {9 D1 \; w6 P; r) s. X
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
3 @# M- b8 N N* c8 _; E5 C) Cprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
6 A4 J) L+ }* f. J8 T2 Jfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This. D$ x2 e+ R, @/ L2 x
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
) r& j2 ]; ] f# ^# z& i5 y7 ~ B! fthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately9 j! u6 s9 H# Z$ }
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
; P$ i$ n3 M/ ithree years.
/ [9 C$ p& s9 `By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from5 k: u6 e0 M, S4 y. x3 H
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
+ t5 R7 S: g) Y& A* b" kaffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
, h, |9 T/ o- S2 H( t* ^+ vboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
# j$ k: M1 j% p% J+ s0 s& Zto fundamentally justified levels.
2 L2 M+ x) |& K" M8 I- A% GWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”$ L1 N* o' R' R8 K
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and9 }1 k( ]2 c& {, b+ ?" R$ N
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”8 X/ ]2 K" j+ b, _$ X* H7 s5 e
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
% ^$ V# `: P- I! u+ M& Gthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s# |1 T; k4 h$ f% `4 m# j1 M
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where8 R) T& v7 |! @
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch# Q& n- x1 | ]! ~3 j
that is now being rapidly reined in.7 R. r0 d; V' ^" m; k; @" p
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
8 P. ~+ K+ C; v0 othe construction of too many new homes over the boom
0 B0 P: \% J" B$ P( j# g. y. tmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh& ?: ^' x3 g" L+ k Q: F0 x
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
* H8 ^2 k5 e6 {0 g0 o) c/ Qfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will7 H1 t/ ~% I9 L* s) @1 w
remain choppy and new residential construction will be# U5 f* Z$ b6 J; l, i; D- c
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction X9 T* c. I* o) P* I$ a3 Q% L
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
# M. B( v3 t% a+ `1 ~, s( Rto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide1 E* J X: d' ^: ]0 @
residential construction will fall further to around# _! R+ B: U4 p( Z" e% l2 y
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units& T8 q' n; X( I0 i4 D& t7 J: O" F
in the fourth quarter.! A. K" s4 Q, W- e- q; [6 n
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,, ]( y5 I+ E" O0 D2 W
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
* E4 J8 g0 E0 o+ z6 Pfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each* L2 [2 a5 m1 @) N0 A
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
( K9 k* ]1 ?" L; p) J9 H6 d$ yvalues since house prices should track incomes over the, ^! k5 F' k! J! ?% E
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
) z1 U6 j& B8 g& D1 l4 Mregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers* o k+ H7 _2 q9 B& X! @
of residential construction.
% S) b1 _8 R* N% H3 G5 rTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
& ^) Q6 U r1 N- \7 T+ k“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction+ b; p1 p! p9 X* V
would have occurred if housing had been priced
, z/ m$ [" o% m/ S$ B+ I8 Joptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this9 E9 \1 L+ ~4 G: K9 n5 }
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new6 y7 K! m, q0 a6 \
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
+ h( p0 f; N- F# C1 U& [+ J7 imany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.6 p7 ~+ G6 S7 }. g% M* Y0 P
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
6 {7 z) H+ s% a+ Z3 |& i. ?. hwhere housing demand will further contract under waning4 N+ `' ]# H. I/ U7 y
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are" P$ d9 `+ w: d# D' J; k
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
: P8 C, A6 k# T; [. Kvery time that the resale market has swung into strong1 c7 k$ a1 u f& Q2 b, t m
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
6 e$ V# h. Y3 h6 }2 f" i, Khas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural% L- s% v1 j+ Q, @5 v0 {
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
6 w9 n" u3 X2 u$ A% O) RQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
7 f) j5 |1 S: {8 astrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de. i9 c9 R. \' R- ]) U
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,! p. f+ ~8 e0 p
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership7 k% S7 o2 G. l) x/ `
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a% ]" b* {& Z3 P5 G, p* O& X4 K3 A
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears4 M7 b! w7 ?2 Y5 D7 N
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto4 u) P" S( x2 U! C6 m' B
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically) ]* j' Z/ d' F2 W7 U) G
high levels of apartment-style units presently under6 w* z7 Q" _0 j! I) o# ]: v) A
construction mean that record numbers of condos will0 o) b. t7 o& j! L$ h6 m! A
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as* U1 }* M1 s: p' w s! O
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
2 P0 D# z. h! c. b3 jspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
6 z$ f* E& v v- O! O& g8 Qresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we/ n# p$ T: d0 D' |
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from( H( v) p+ \+ v! m4 p& [ m
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
+ X1 `; c$ r! pyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,% A, T: B5 L* G* F! E
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
& E" L3 G/ n. f. v- V) @OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
1 p' g3 r8 Z) A } fMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS- r5 v- N) j) Y9 C- P
Grant Bishop, Economist6 S" ]5 _ W& _' S. J
416-982-8063. R( P. v1 C9 @3 q% Z- h
Pascal Gauthier, Economist/ K- A3 }# c! X& D# E
416-944-5730
; A; ^) \) R8 O) Q, t
# V0 v2 H/ U( o4 Z7 \http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|