埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2463|回复: 2

[其他] Dow化工亚省工厂将裁员

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 13:59 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
道化工亚省工厂将裁员6 T3 Q% c5 K- d9 A% S* D. j
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs7 G0 Z/ U: N: p  f( B0 H
8 O8 S% i. X; j* L7 K
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.: v! T8 W) E, N  D# g& d

& `1 x: b1 l5 mMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. # w7 c' a: E( O" Y
9 O1 W1 x" w  [4 ?$ P
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
1 _7 I  o: b+ }2 j6 V* Q  x" ~( F! {1 y% r+ C" X' @
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
. r$ i* ^+ U  j  }" r
  ^0 j" x( |; d* PDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.3 n6 p3 Z) H$ ~; a: ?0 Y2 |
- k. M  K( o& _7 d7 I
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.- o" O1 y8 l/ B4 y

6 s- H/ v0 ?" d/ cDow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
2 M1 J6 t$ z5 J; E! ^
/ H# y  R1 m2 {9 s8 k( h0 ?' }1 vPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.. G/ V2 Q  f! [" A: V, Y/ O; ^4 h
. ?1 r" C  O- h- c" ?+ z' d
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.”
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:03 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:57 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-10-27 21:03 , Processed in 0.365289 second(s), 15 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表