 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
, Q! W; Q+ o9 ^, f7 f( tDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs+ B! M @4 C" U9 G! K' ^5 ]2 U
: |3 y* O2 a8 b! a7 T; f6 }EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.9 ]5 w# @* G# W% @; r% X
) d) i5 S# h) {. _6 g: ~; r5 Q! QMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. 1 Q' ]6 _+ ^1 |8 L1 B! d* O
2 V/ {% Y# j% h/ D8 uThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said./ ^. c' |) n6 H3 J7 n8 q' }
8 T* V5 q6 J& Y/ FDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
$ d4 I* C) o# g' ~* i* `8 D. V! ^; s: ~* P
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.8 h- _$ o9 S; W" g4 w g% C& H
& Q& b5 q( ~: G/ H
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
: j! y7 C0 L8 S0 R6 [5 T% L, s! K* ]) a* I& u- J
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
+ X; y+ M: L0 I5 \; G% g' B# O! E0 H# e; B. z3 O
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.6 ^( K3 ^) [% r. l5 T
5 m$ d7 B0 n$ ]' p; Y
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|