 鲜花( 7)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
House prices are going to go up next year, albeit by a mere $200, according to Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp.
$ V4 a. l" ^: |( t- V& q
. p( B4 i( @/ V) R7 F8 dThe Crown corporation warned that some moderation can be expected in the once red-hot housing sector for the rest of this year and into 2009.
9 J" o+ \* C6 U8 l3 {4 w* `- r3 d; L
The forecast comes as house prices have been falling nationally, according to the Canadian Real Estate Association. Canada's largest housing markets have experienced prices declines from a year ago for four straight months, with each percentage drop bigger than the next.
$ F# Y2 d9 |# q; C* o k% l# W( \+ D: } w- U
Now CMHC has waded into the debate with its own forecast that despite the recent trend, home sale prices should edge up this year.% G+ r3 o$ q; \* a
9 J! O; E* _7 u/ O9 b/ C
It expects the average price of a home sold to rise to $306,500 from $305,707. By next year the average sale price is forecast to rise to $306,700.: I0 D* M) K. _! l# w
9 Y! b0 V* m+ w2 E
"High employment levels, rising incomes and low mortgage rates have continued to provide a solid foundation for healthy housing markets this year," said Bob Dugan.
1 l4 ?" c: A2 N( P: r3 C; y% K7 g _8 R
However, CMHC is clearly predicting a pullback and titled its latest report, "Housing market starting to ease." $ ~# b5 \- L4 m
6 P7 L, J7 X1 u) w, t9 ?
It says for the first time in seven years the number of new homes built across the country will dip below 200,000. , `5 ?! L+ g2 m4 }
) X& |5 R! |2 dThe agency is forecasting 212,188 starts for this year which will be a drop from the 228,343 homes built in 2007. By 2009, the forecast is for 177,975 new homes to be built. - @' k6 g' C, S' M
7 n% o @( t! s1 _' x. h. t
The prognosis is not much better for the sales of existing homes. After setting an all-time sales record of 523,701 transactions in 2007, sales are expected to drop to 452,225 in 2008 and 433,375 in 2009.
) Q- O; A; ]5 `$ X0 f; I3 f& L7 z2 x7 E, @
CMHC says those sales are "still strong" by historical standards. |
|