 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
. _0 l) A4 @/ d4 T& T" X& ]楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
3 @5 s- m8 o1 s6 ]corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... , L7 P% D' A( @3 C
4 S5 Y8 a( w' {; E您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。2 M& d$ I { _- x. s( n
' V) C8 [) ^* a
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
" ?' G1 x- T; A+ s( s1 O8 {& F8 G1 S- T, r. I+ \/ R G+ q7 j
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
& C" e) L, f# {* n, |" K# C6 a0 K% F& |
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。& I7 d7 n' }. O0 C
5 \& S- `( l! V& i @" r
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
3 B+ k$ |1 E* V( q% x0 X, TYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
( x3 d& t9 q7 }4 _; W9 h, N* h7 S, O0 m3 `( [. x
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
7 X2 S4 V% j4 \/ }1 ~5 `: B8 W* @
, B. l+ U7 l1 ]. O1 lBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
9 w4 ]4 M: Y- n1 T3 f, I, Z) _& N' E. J! d; U
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|