 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
; o: ~1 o R" ^2 S) } e* j楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!. Z* \! r7 p6 s; K/ U& |; {) i7 V
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 0 _- C$ o& e# h& v" q
3 Z0 O0 a4 X [您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。" [. \8 ]0 G: A- q
7 ?( H& Q# [/ `2 P& N. Y安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.# P6 X$ P: t0 ?+ D* }
) z4 ^/ g4 L6 `( f h7 }不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
# o) \: I! a% x R- n2 r
" [& j5 j/ V3 P/ }: D另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。: ^- N7 j' H# }4 N) ~+ @/ q
& O6 w9 k3 D2 V: o关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
; p, x+ q2 i' s( V/ \/ R* ]# OYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
; \# L2 t: n! Y+ B N$ ~# h0 d) {3 A* Q
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
7 C# u0 Q5 v4 Z3 Y# o0 K/ @9 a$ `2 f/ Z
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
4 E- g$ r' v1 f8 U2 Q, P, j7 d7 u8 {2 W7 D
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|