 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 * [# l! m* z, d" H' k
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!1 X& `* Z0 m$ v Z/ [1 R2 S4 s
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
0 u% K) Q7 u( _$ N/ q9 h& s2 u
% O! q6 T. `& e, C) u1 H1 r您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
! b6 Z1 v" @( H l- \
/ J9 t( ` {; g' U9 v# ~( U7 U安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
; O) S0 L: o7 q, B. C6 i9 s( S& h5 x1 M6 \
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?2 o; K2 M8 g, d
% J3 m$ K7 Y- T. z2 F' H: |' c
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
6 t Z4 k ~( R4 l4 M3 _4 Y) N6 _) r u5 H2 k2 o: q
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):- G8 a. {# h$ b; W5 K
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
3 v& ?' L, v9 E' F/ O- ^
. r0 I. g/ _6 r9 j: m% g Q0 k2 jOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
s/ z8 L. E. `3 z# D# t
) a W# Y( A- }9 K9 U! P6 BBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
4 @+ d/ @4 o& }9 }
Z! d9 H! ~7 f[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|