 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 ' H6 K# U- ^ V, M/ ]% }5 f* I
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了! F' ? I+ o" n: y& o
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 0 \+ G4 ^; x" i, T2 s2 b
- F3 e0 ^9 l6 Q J您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
4 I, R9 Z& l" `$ z4 D0 M. S& B" o! @2 f
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.6 X4 g1 T _# c4 i0 }# L
. V3 a) h! Q& Q5 S+ w不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?' H& U @1 H' d- H8 z3 ^
9 g4 V6 f# x v. E- Y7 c, n
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
' X% m# B: b- m, ~& y9 C6 e/ C8 @3 |8 o: e
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):. s W2 h2 }" U* F
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.8 F3 O+ j- n/ ?
6 J; V+ z; W. N% Q! e8 O7 z; f5 `$ W9 gOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".2 M4 N1 L8 n3 }4 Z/ C1 c+ G
. x8 _9 k1 _ s# b; `( c# _& }8 @
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.1 o- p8 y+ R+ p3 t7 k+ h2 ]
9 @3 ]! F6 N3 y1 A/ ^7 O[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|