 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 " C6 v& @ o. S! ~( E
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!5 ^2 H; b0 O8 l* O' F7 O
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
. Y% V5 A2 m$ D$ P8 _% S) }; H& d9 g- E
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
+ w( Y6 F7 F3 X' N( h. ?. `5 i2 u+ k- O* b6 |! Z- U* ^! s/ q
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
% L. g4 E, N: \% j6 t: ?, J
/ a) ^" k1 Q. {0 {不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?( Y, f# B; ]+ K. t) n( Z* d5 f
, t1 {6 O+ t* i% e" [9 ?) d5 M* `
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。% D c2 M4 T Z/ T* {2 j- I
, U& o# {1 x; `6 x9 @
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):0 q) V% O0 J# a. x
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
. {" s) w7 @" [* Q4 m+ L
' n- q3 o2 X4 D D, ^Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".+ L# X( |6 T _/ _! E1 Q
: t# h0 I: a1 P( _9 R
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
: ?2 A+ C6 o" J* v. E# @ u' C3 B/ M) w! \7 a/ T
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|