 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 # J) T4 ]' X v& X$ j) E @8 k2 D# B
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!$ Q, O# g3 u" t' x
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
' {% i) f4 g* I- n1 c$ \9 V M4 I( @ B3 P1 v
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
: b p) r0 S) c
9 I) x/ `$ Z$ Y% ]( k- c安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.. m( s. b7 ~) ]
) g: Z- Z- w1 b" y# s1 {' K0 Z2 t4 m
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
+ |' ?' K; e% l# N n& \! k0 X* o, |- T6 M0 m" Q( y4 b( H) u
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。- M) e5 J+ e$ E3 m7 J P [) i2 l. M
, C; G0 r! V( u+ _: u关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
+ Y3 e9 |8 A& X+ ?! LYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
! E2 L- X& s! a p/ m0 x
! F4 @; c, |- \. r! vOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
% B2 e) ~. ^; n* j1 I1 c6 x- G2 K' ]# D7 r% r
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
C" ^5 V1 q7 ?) c0 C" K3 W0 t. _$ F. C6 e" r) P- B! w# |* s, c) y
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|