 鲜花( 27)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
原帖由 Homework 于 2007-3-30 19:30 发表* v3 e2 Z: e" |, P
为什么呢?北面的Twin Brooks不错,南面的Rutherford也可以,111 Street对面的Richford的有些房子价格不菲,为啥就MacEwan不好呢?
, |4 W+ m! j+ B / u5 x8 Z* v, Z! H
6 s! ^+ J2 ` f8 Z; I/ ]& |
MacEwan is fairly good. But not as good as Twin Brooks and Rutherford. MacEwan has more multi-houses (apartment, duplex) and the number of rented house is higher. The followings are the comparison based on the data a year ago.
: j1 a3 t. w& s5 y. E7 A5 i
3 k* _! V6 O1 g7 c! Y- g Single house/total house rent house/total house* S% o, R+ c5 H, L
MacEwan 62% 17%
/ F, s# @$ k! F" q3 @8 |6 SRutherford 78% 4%
1 ~) y- C c# X, c# K) bTwin Brooks 85% 2% |
|