Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
$ N# C+ ^% r5 k; @% w
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

! @/ l6 a* E  n" w, ~Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
7 S! ^% X' h; W( ?/ c- R
& B" r: \* j1 O; J
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
; m5 Q1 |. I* K! v4 }3 f* {
San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
0 @6 q' `0 {2 S! Q$ [: qYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

) q# n0 R3 y4 N+ b! s; ]' L: T! lIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
/ c9 }' o* y0 T; m( s5 O1 w) ~
If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

8 M: x2 q* i; ~9 u Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
2 U$ e' e6 A/ V3 a$ V  I0 n8 ]( } Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
" n: Y+ I4 B8 O7 ^1 _, ASan Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
8 ?5 X9 Q: l0 \5 ?; DNew York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
. m9 |- z1 k% V7 s  G
: j  b6 o5 }; f& s+ B% n  |
) h( v7 `4 L3 [' n- I7 G# E# a
+ u# _! g" k- E- u5 G( s4 GIt's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.

4 \( |$ q4 Y* k% |- g3 y( p) y" Y
From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
3 |+ W$ \- _' @$ M& u
it would be a good reference.
/ i* t$ J8 @2 q" R+ ~5 j
1 v' L2 v" `8 S- Gthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]