Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
: w& I* h' G) k
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
( \7 F/ n3 y5 c# ?# u4 h; o. n
Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
. l) i3 k5 D: E/ h( Z2 R- B, P6 ~
. D  i9 s, y( h# N. M$ P" U8 D/ |To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:

4 f5 b7 H* k. T" e( S0 j5 R1 m
' T7 c6 S: i: o1 d; `( G8 P( |& M) c! VIn Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
- r; {6 o5 |- _, |; v8 |# `
, A' [9 a: b/ z' {; }- ISan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
4 G6 t, q2 Q1 n+ iSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
0 w. p1 ~! H% t! g* _, }You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

. a2 g  p) |5 K, c, jIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
2 L* O- R( x, y7 K/ u
If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

+ [2 Q) U6 L9 K2 W) Z Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
- p( |( ?9 z9 `: z& ~ Avg. 1988-2000 2001
) {0 R( Z6 D1 x) J3 hBoston  20.5 30.2
) I: U! B0 C9 [) k  JSan Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
6 X! j" G! i" H& vLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
8 E; r$ J2 O: W- G3 n& P  b" ASeattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
* f& u- h2 @& v) e9 L7 RChicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
- f% M! `. B, A; e- ^


It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
! x$ A) H4 m: a( i

# v. W, h: l  |6 \2 [- \From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

( }; \* C( ~- H  q, E$ V! s+ Sit would be a good reference.

thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
/ w$ D# S0 U; [7 l' |, t
7 K5 h; G) T3 z' _- J[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]