Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
% l+ r. O, o* L/ _+ O9 pLeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

" p1 H' q/ G; W: a6 G# ?Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
3 R& G3 E2 R' k* i7 g% I( }
1 U) \# X; l2 \! S# N+ q4 H5 A* }Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
5 p1 X5 N# \5 C2 Y3 v
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:

% q! g8 T: G, q  U4 R% A9 M
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
2 ]7 S% g+ T1 w0 t9 |# hYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
' C3 G, j3 v  ~5 t. G
/ I, k5 v# \  z$ W" v$ c7 D! n5 X8 cIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
& a) T' z9 G. I
/ P6 K* n, U0 j8 |+ M: f* jIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
$ W- ~1 {) r1 T' c, d+ w% e5 g
4 k. R' z; S( t: {1 ` Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
  o* b& U. b; q* DSan Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
/ U1 l( W9 G' P7 [0 LLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
: A" F0 E# w# G: I/ vDenver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
# b7 E, h5 N$ l9 z0 n. k6 cChicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
8 Q. I6 a# f( d


It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
9 f; q- s5 C0 l; }& K9 C4 C
+ v6 f. s/ f; o, Y
: U0 N$ q' x6 ^" v& d. CFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
7 X" y" w; q* o- O4 `0 [
0 y, ]8 B5 Y: g9 N/ F0 c" f9 ^/ Yit would be a good reference.
1 A$ u& \0 D5 d& V! t- o7 u& y
7 v' P4 G& M( J) \2 y% X& Jthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
" U  w* r0 d& n: e  f; j5 T
1 h3 x, K9 f4 X- M2 n8 q6 H% z[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]