Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
& E2 D8 u9 c* ~Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
6 X/ }) f& d# g" {$ D$ n
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
* x0 Z$ [4 f' G& R
Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
( m% p& _0 j) u1 V7 n% T

In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
  r( T! ]/ ]! p5 j; |
; v1 `) D6 V! C, r* FSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
3 ~- Y/ t9 q  @1 ?: \# WNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
5 u; o' s; _4 J
! _) E* `' t1 q* D# q' FIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

! g5 B) D  G. |2 t+ B& y Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
" n0 a" p; S% L, o2 R1 H2 l9 }8 R Avg. 1988-2000 2001
8 U3 M: w# A$ {* K9 K, i( {, ~! xBoston  20.5 30.2
. J) Q# S2 c* `5 W+ A$ |+ D& Q, }San Diego  22.8 29.7
" C- ^; d& P* G: t7 w% L: @San Francisco  23.8 27.2
8 W4 ]+ ?( e4 f; qLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
2 x4 r6 {$ f$ @; s- r* A3 QDenver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
% |2 n  s. Q0 M, RWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
. o4 M; ~: F  c( a( u* h


  @5 \5 _/ W4 F# }It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.


) [5 }* p: h' N% P7 t. WFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
9 x4 s! S; c* [" W6 k7 b/ ]" N
. p% N1 a: u& B6 mit would be a good reference.

thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]