Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

& ^) G7 x# G" ?To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
: j) E( z; E' p/ f/ E2 s

In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

- \) C6 O4 R  I7 \San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
& Q; V/ ]. u$ x, i7 zYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
. c; h$ O. N# y; W
If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

1 U* i$ g5 F; T, V" w9 I* A Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
* q* C. `$ J" JDenver  17.7 23.7
) u* i# K( x5 XNew York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
* L) y! }0 r9 J/ N$ ^; ~  U3 Y1 ?2 EWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
* C- I) ^6 R  {+ b: F9 S# Q# W
( L* e/ U! f1 Z/ w6 \

It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.

, p8 g9 H8 m& {% @  k" b
( }7 `% J3 `/ l; L* S$ s) x. jFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
# z) u" [$ \( d0 F7 z4 C
it would be a good reference.
$ }6 b. j" S! D  b
1 p) D& i9 N& h$ G$ ]* \- l' ^! n. N) Rthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
( x2 A% a3 ]4 l
[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]